SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Fendrich, M. & Johnson, T. P. (2001) Examining prevalence differences in three national surveys of youth: impact of consent procedures, mode, and editing rules. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 615642.
  • Fendrich, M., Johnson, T., Wislar, J. S., Hubbell, A. & Spiehler, V. (2004) The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey. Addiction, 99, 197208.
  • Fendrich, M. & Kim, J. Y. S. (2001) Multiwave analysis of retest artifact in the national longitudinal survey of youth drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 62, 239253.
  • Fendrich, M. & Mackesy-Amiti, M. E. (2000) Decreased drug reporting in a cross-sectional student drug use survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11, 161172.
  • Fendrich, M. & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2003) Recanting of substance use reports in a longitudinal prevention study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 70, 241253.
  • Midanik, L. T. & Greenfield, T. K. (2004) Methodological articles in addiction journals: do we need more, less, or about the same amount? [Editorial]. Addiction, 99, 145151.
  • Percy, A., McAlister, S., Higgins, K., McCrystal, P. & Thornton, M. (2005) Response consistency in young adolescents’ drug use self-reports: a recanting rate analysis. Addiction, 100, 189196.
  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. & Rasinski, K. (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.