Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: I. Treatment implementation and research design. Addiction 2007; doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01862.x. ,
Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: II. Participant samples and assessment methods. Addiction 2007; doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01863.x. ,
The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction 2003; 98 (Suppl. 2): 1–12.
Up close and personal: temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 155–64.
, , ,
Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshman college students. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73: 229–38.
, , , ,
Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1998; 59: 631–9.
Managing data for a randomized controlled trial: experience from the WHO Antenatal Care Trial. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1998; 12 (Suppl. 2): 142–55.
, , , ,
Strategies for Facilitating Protocol Compliance in Alcoholism Treatment Research. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 7. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1998, p. 93–110. Project MATCH—a case study: the role of a coordinating center in facilitating research compliance in a multisite clinical trial. In: , , , , , , editors.
A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika 1997; 84: 419–27.
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 1998; 316: 1236–8.
On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 613–19.
Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994; 272: 122–4.
Methodological characteristics and quality of alcohol treatment outcome studies, 1970–98: an expanded evaluation. Addiction 2002; 97: 252–63.
Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
A review of statistical power analysis software. Bull Ecol Soc Am 1997; 78: 126–39. ,
Power of latent growth modeling for detecting groups differences in linear growth trajectory parameters. Struct Equat Model 2003; 10: 380–400.
Power calculations for survival analyses via Monte Carlo estimation. Am J Ind Med 2003; 44: 532–9.
Attrition in substance abuse comparative treatment research: the illusion of randomization. In: OnkenL. S., BlaineJ. D., editors. Psychotherapy and Counseling in the Treatment of Drug Abuse. NIDA Monograph no. 104. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1990, p. 66–79. , ,
Ensuring the comparability of control groups: is randomization enough? Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 515–24.
Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265–81.
Propensity score matching: an illustrative analysis of dose–response. Med Care 2003; 41: 1183–92.
The causal role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41–55.
Principles in modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidem Dr S 2004; 13: 841–53.
, , , ,
Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. Stat Med 2001; 20: 3931–46.
Intention-to-treat analysis and the goals of clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 57: 6–15.
Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: alternative model specifications. J Educ Behav Stat 2002; 27: 385–409.
Is there another way to take account of noncompliance in randomized controlled trials? Can Med Assoc J 2006; 175: 347–8.
et al. Internal validity of Project MATCH: discriminability and integrity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66: 290–303.
, , , , ,
Nonspecific treatment factors in psychotherapy outcome research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1979; 47: 846–51.
et al. A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 57: 225–38.
, , , , ,
Shaping evidence-based practice. APA Mon Psychol 2005; 36: 26–31.
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
Methodological assessment and critique. In: LongabaughR., WirtzP. W., editors. Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 8. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2001, p. 296–304. ,
When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 403–21.
, , , ,
Threats to validity in randomized clinical trials. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 79–87.
Hierarchical Linear Models. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992. ,
et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma 2005; 59: 698–704.
, , , , ,
Applying latent growth curve modeling to the investigation of individual difference in cardiovascular recovery form stress. Psychosom Med 2004; 66: 29–41.
, , , ,
et al. Estimating treatment effects from longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values: comparative analyses using different methods. Psychiat Res 2004; 129: 209–15.
, , , , ,
Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 147–77.
Between-group therapy outcome research: design and methodology. In: OnkenL. S., BlaineJ. D., BorenJ. J., editors. Behavioral Treatments for Drug Abuse and Dependence. NIDA Mongraph no. 137. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1993, p. 249–89.
Project MATCH Research Group. Therapist effects in three treatments for alcohol problems. Psychother Res 1998; 8: 455–74.
Therapist effects in the treatment of drug dependence: implications for conducting comparative treatment studies. In: OnkenL. S., BlaineJ. D., BorenJ. J., editors. Behavioral Treatments for Drug Abuse and Dependence. NIDA Mongraph no. 137. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1993, p. 39–49. , ,
Methods for handling dropouts in longitudinal clinical trials. Stat Neerl 2003; 57: 75–99.
Sensitivity analyses would help. Am Econ Rev 1983; 75: 308–13.
Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J R Stat Soc 1983; 45: 212–18.
When clinical trials fail: a guide to disaggregation. In: OnkenL. S., BlaineJ. D., BorenJ. J., editors. Behavioral Treatments for Drug Abuse and Dependence. NIDA Mongraph no. 137. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1993, p. 291–302.
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1173–82.
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 83–104.
, , , ,
Mediation analysis. Ann Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 593–614.
Changing the way we study change in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2004; 11: 368–86.
Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: methodological issues and research recommendations. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003; 44: 1116–29.
Active ingredients: how and why evidence-based alcohol behavioral treatment interventions work. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29: 235–47.
, , , , ,
Causal chain analysis. In: LongabaughR., WirtzP. W., editors. Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 8. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2001, p. 18–28. ,
Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 89: 852–63.
Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Struct Equat Model 2003; 10: 238–62.
Coping skills and treatment outcomes in cognitive–behavioral therapy and interactional group therapy for alcoholism. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 118–28.
, , ,
Addictive disorders in context: principles and puzzles of effective treatment and recovery. Psychol Addict Behav 2003; 17: 3–12.
A look inside treatment: therapist effects, the therapeutic alliance, and the process of intentional behavior change. In: BaborT. F., Del BocaF. K., editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003, p. 166–83. , , , ,
Methodology: what are the design issues involved in the defined research priorities? In: OnkenL. S., BlaineJ. D., BorenJ. J., editors. Behavioral Treatments for Drug Abuse and Dependence. NIDA Research Mongraph no. 137. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1993, p. 105–18.
An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Eval Program Plann 2003; 26: 339–52.
Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction 2005; 100: 447–58.
, , , ,