A comparison of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and smoking prevalence across countries
Article first published online: 14 APR 2008
© 2008 The Authors
Volume 103, Issue 5, pages 841–845, May 2008
How to Cite
Fagerström, K. and Furberg, H. (2008), A comparison of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and smoking prevalence across countries. Addiction, 103: 841–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02190.x
- Issue published online: 14 APR 2008
- Article first published online: 14 APR 2008
- Submitted 25 September 2007; initial review completed 19 December 2007; final version accepted 4 February 2008
- FTND score;
- nicotine dependence;
- smoking prevalence
Aims To examine the correlation between the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score and smoking prevalence across countries.
Design Cross-sectional study.
Setting Fifteen studies from 13 countries with FTND score data.
Participants Samples of smokers were identified through systematic literature searches, web queries and colleagues. Smokers were considered representative of their country's smoking population if they were drawn from population-based sources, were not seeking smoking cessation treatment and did not have significant comorbidities. Smoking prevalence data were derived from the study itself or the country's population rate of daily smoking for the study year.
Measurements A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the direction and magnitude of the correlation between FTND score and smoking prevalence across countries.
Findings FTND scores ranged from 2.8 to 4.6. Smokers in Germany and Norway had the lowest FTND scores, while smokers in Sweden and the United States had the highest FTND scores. The prevalence of daily smoking in these countries was very different: 37% and 30% in Germany and Norway, 19% and 16% in the United States and Sweden, respectively. An inverse correlation towards higher FTND scores in countries with lower smoking prevalence was found (r =−0.73, P = 0.001). Current smokers had higher FTND scores than former smokers.
Conclusions The significant inverse correlation between FTND score and smoking prevalence across countries and higher FTND score among current smokers supports the idea that remaining smokers may be hardening. Less dependent smokers may quit more easily and remaining dependent smokers may need more intensive treatment.