This study was conducted when the first author was still at Maastricht University.
Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers
Article first published online: 11 JAN 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Society for the Study of Addiction
Volume 105, Issue 2, pages 279–287, February 2010
How to Cite
Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K. and Strack, F. (2010), Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction, 105: 279–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x
- Issue published online: 11 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 11 JAN 2010
- Submitted 19 January 2009; initial review completed 18 March 2009; final version accepted 11 August 2009
- approach bias;
- approach avoidance;
- cognitive bias;
- implicit cognition;
- problem drinking;
Aims The main aim of this study was to test whether automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol can be modified, and whether this affects drinking behaviour.
Design and participants Forty-two hazardous drinkers were assigned randomly to a condition in which they were implicitly trained to avoid or to approach alcohol, using a training variety of the alcohol Approach Avoidance Test (AAT). Participants pushed or pulled a joystick in response to picture-format (landscape or portrait). The pictures depicted alcoholic or non-alcoholic drinks. Participants in the avoid-alcohol condition pushed most alcoholic and pulled most non-alcoholic drinks. For participants in the approach-alcohol condition these contingencies were reversed. After the implicit training, participants performed a taste test, including beers and soft drinks. Automatic action tendencies at post-test were assessed with the AAT, including both trained and untrained pictures, and with a different test (Implicit Association Test, IAT). We further tested effects on subjective craving.
Results Action tendencies for alcohol changed in accordance with training condition, with the largest effects in the clinically relevant avoid-alcohol condition. These effects occurred outside subjective awareness and generalized to new pictures in the AAT and to an entirely different test using words, rather than pictures (IAT). In relatively heavy drinking participants who demonstrated changed action tendencies in accordance with their training condition, effects were found on drinking behaviour, with participants in the approach-alcohol condition drinking more alcohol than participants in the avoid-alcohol condition. No effect was found on subjective craving.
Conclusions Retraining automatic processes may help to regain control over addictive impulses, which points to new treatment possibilities.