SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Holder H. D. Prevention programs in the 21st century: what we do not discuss in public. Addiction 2010; 105: 57881.
  • 2
    Lillienfield S. O. Pseudiscience in contemporary clinical psychology: what it is and what we can do about it. Clin Psychol 1998; 51: 39.
  • 3
    Bunge M. Demarcating science from pseudoscience. Fundam Sci 1982; 3: 36988.
  • 4
    Bunge M. The philosophy behind pseudoscience. Skeptical Inquirer 2006; 30: 2937.
  • 5
    Lilienfeld S. O., Lynn S. J., Lohr J. M. (2003). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology: initial thoughts, reflections, and considerations. In: LilienfeldS. O., LynnS. J., LohrJ. M., editors. Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. New York: Guilford Press; 2003, p. 114.
  • 6
    MacKillop J., Lisman S. A., Weinstein A., Rosenbaum D. Controversial treatments for alcoholism. In: LilienfeldS. O., LynnS. J., LohrJ. M., editors. Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. New York: Guilford Press; 2003, p. 273305.
  • 7
    Herbert J. D., Lilienfeld S. O., Lohr J. M., Montgomery R. W., O'Donohue W. T., Rosen G. M. et al. Science and pseudoscience in the development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: implications for clinical psychology. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20: 94571.
  • 8
    Lilienfield S. O. Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspect Psychol Sci 2007; 2: 5370.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    West S. L., O'Neal K. K. Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 10271029.