The effect of time spent in treatment and dropout status on rates of convictions, cautions and imprisonment over 5 years in a primary care-led methadone maintenance service
Article first published online: 10 MAR 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Society for the Study of Addiction
Volume 105, Issue 4, pages 732–739, April 2010
How to Cite
Oliver, P., Keen, J., Rowse, G., Ewins, E., Griffiths, L. and Mathers, N. (2010), The effect of time spent in treatment and dropout status on rates of convictions, cautions and imprisonment over 5 years in a primary care-led methadone maintenance service. Addiction, 105: 732–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02856.x
- Issue published online: 10 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 10 MAR 2010
- Submitted 15 June 2007; initial review completed 27 September 2007; final version accepted 5 November 2009
- methadone maintenance treatment;
- primary care
Background Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in primary care settings is used increasingly as a standard method of delivering treatment for heroin users. It has been shown to reduce criminal activity and incarceration over periods of periods of 12 months or less; however, little is known about the effect of this treatment over longer durations.
Aims To examine the association between treatment status and rates of convictions and cautions (judicial disposals) over a 5-year period in a cohort of heroin users treated in a general practitioner (GP)-led MMT service.
Design Cohort study.
Setting The primary care clinic for drug dependence, Sheffield, 1999–2005.
Participants The cohort comprised 108 consecutive patients who were eligible and entered treatment. Ninety were followed-up for the full 5 years.
Intervention The intervention consisted of MMT provided by GPs in a primary care clinic setting.
Measurements Criminal conviction and caution rates and time spent in prison, derived from Police National Computer (PNC) criminal records.
Findings The overall reduction in the number of convictions and cautions expected for patients entering MMT in similar primary care settings is 10% for each 6 months retained in treatment. Patients in continuous treatment had the greatest reduction in judicial disposal rates, similar to those who were discharged for positive reasons (e.g. drug free). Patients who had more than one treatment episode over the observation period did no better than those who dropped out of treatment.
Conclusions MMT delivered in a primary care clinic setting is effective in reducing convictions and cautions and incarceration over an extended period. Continuous treatment is associated with the greatest reductions.