• 1
    Witkiewitz K., Hartzler B., Donovan D. Matching motivation enhancement treatment to client motivation: re-examining the Project MATCH motivation-matching hypothesis. Addiction 2010; 105: 140313.
  • 2
    Amrhein P. C., Miller W. R., Yahne C. E., Palmer M., Fulcher L. Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 86278.
  • 3
    Apodaca T. R., Longabaugh R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction 2009; 104: 70515.
  • 4
    Moos R. Theory based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88: 10921.
  • 5
    Orford J. Asking the right questions in the right way: the need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction. Addiction 2008; 103: 87585.
  • 6
    Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1998; 59: 6319.
  • 7
    UKATT Research Team. Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 5414.
  • 8
    Tober G. Evidence based practice—still a bridge too far for addiction counsellors? Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2002; 9: 1720.
  • 9
    Donovan D. M., Carroll K. M., Kadden R. M., DiClemente C. C., Rounsaville B. Therapies for matching: selection, development, implementation and costs. In: BaborT., Del BocaF., editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003, p. 4261.
  • 10
    Witkiewitz K., Van Der Maas H. J., Hufford M. R., Marlatt G. Non normality and divergence in post treatment alcohol use: re-examining Project MATCH data ‘Another Way’. J Abnorm Psychol 2007; 116: 37894.
  • 11
    Raistrick D. Motivation and barriers to change. In: ToberG., RaistrickD., editors. Motivational Dialogue: Preparing Addiction Professionals for Motivational Interviewing Practice. London: Routledge; 2007, p. 1633.
  • 12
    Raistrick D., Heather N., Godfrey C. Review of the Effectiveness of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. London: Department of Health; 2007.
  • 13
    Carroll K., Rounsaville B. Perhaps it is the Dodo bird concept that should be extinct. Addiction 2010; 105: 1421.
  • 14
    Carroll K. M., Kadden R. M., Donovan D. M., Zweben A., Rounsaville B. J. Implementing treatment and protecting the validity of the independent variable in treatment matching studies. J Stud Alcohol 1994; Suppl 12: 14955.
  • 15
    Tober G., Godfrey C., Parrott S., Copello A., Farrin A., Hodgson R. et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. Setting standards for training and competence: the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Alcohol Alcohol 2005;40: 41318.
  • 16
    Martino S., Ball S., Nich C., Frankforter T. L., Carroll K. M. Informal discussions in substance abuse treatment sessions. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009; 36: 36675.
  • 17
    Raistrick D., Tober G., Godfrey C., Parrott S. Treatment as usual. In: MacGregorS., editor. Responding to Drug Misuse: Research and Policy Priorities in Health and Social Care. London: Routledge; 2010, p. 4052.