Get access

A comparison of four international surveys of tobacco dependence treatment provision: implications for monitoring the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Authors

  • Asaf Bitton,

    1. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School; Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Martin Raw,

    1. UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ann Richards,

    1. Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ann McNeill,

    1. UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nancy A. Rigotti

    Corresponding author
    1. Harvard Medical School
    2. Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
      Nancy A. Rigotti, Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Room 914, Boston, MA 02114, USA. E-mail: nrigotti@partners.org
    Search for more papers by this author

Nancy A. Rigotti, Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Room 914, Boston, MA 02114, USA. E-mail: nrigotti@partners.org

ABSTRACT

Aims  Article 14 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) requires countries to implement systems to provide tobacco dependence treatment. We report on global efforts to monitor the implementation of Article 14, and compare the surveys used in this effort.

Design  Cross-sectional comparison of agreement (concordance and discordance) among the four main surveys used to monitor tobacco dependence treatment provision.

Setting  Four global surveys of tobacco treatment provision.

Participants  The four surveys were Raw et al. (2009), the Framework Convention Alliance (FCA) Monitor, World Health Organization (WHO) MPOWER survey and the FCTC Party Reports.

Measurements  Concordance as measured by percentage providing the same answers, as well as kappa statistic of inter-rater agreement.

Findings  The four surveys used to monitor Article 14 implementation vary widely in countries sampled, questions asked, respondent characteristics and survey design. The four surveys generally show a moderate to high concordance (kappa > 0.60) with each other across most survey pairs and most domains, except for the MPOWER and FCTC Party governmental surveys (63% overall concordance, kappa = 0.26). This concordance was lower than any other survey pair examined. Government respondents to the WHO MPOWER and FCTC Party Report surveys provided answers to the same question domains with relatively poorer concordance than those from surveys of non-governmental or mixed governmental/non-governmental sources.

Conclusions  Current surveys of tobacco dependence treatment provision are in general agreement with each other except for the two official government surveys that rely on governmental respondents. We believe that this points to the continued need for independent non-governmental monitoring of FCTC protocol implementation.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary