SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Dietze P., Stoové M., Miller P., Kinner S., Bruno R., Alati R. et al. The self-reported personal wellbeing of a sample of Australian injecting drug users. Addiction 2010; 105: 21418.
  • 2
    Pyne J. M., French M., McCollister K., Tripathi S., Rapp R., Booth B. Preference-weighted health-related quality of life measures and substance use disorder severity. Addiction 2008; 103: 13209.
  • 3
    De Jong C. A., Roozen H. G., Van Rossum L. G., Krabbe P. F., Kerkhof A. J. High abstinence rates in heroin addicts by a new comprehensive treatment approach. Am J Addict 2007; 16: 12430.
  • 4
    Pyne J. M., Booth B. M., Farahati F., Tripathi S., Smith G. R., Marques P. R. Preference-weighted health status associated with substance use-disorders treatment. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67: 43644.
  • 5
    Dolan P. Developing methods that really do value the ‘Q’ in the QALY. Health Econ Policy Law 2008; 3: 6977.
  • 6
    Smith D. M., Brown S. L., Ubel P. A. Are subjective well-being measures any better than decision utility measures? Health Econ Policy Law 2008; 3: 8591.
  • 7
    Hausman D. M. Valuing health properly. Health Econ Policy Law 2008; 3: 7983.
  • 8
    Cummins R. A., Lau A., Stokes M. HRQOL and subjective well-being: noncomplementary forms of outcome measurement. Expt Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2004; 4: 41320.
  • 9
    Kaplan R. M., Bush J. W., Berry C. C. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 1976; 11: 478507.
  • 10
    Ubel P. A., Peters Y., Smith D. Abandoning the language of ‘response shift’: a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 46571.
  • 11
    Pyne J. M., Fortney J. C., Tripathi S., Feeny D., Ubel P., Brazier J. How bad is depression? preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population. Health Serv Res 2009; 44: 140623.
  • 12
    Cummins R. A. Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Soc Indic Res 2000; 52: 5572.
  • 13
    Brickman P., Campbell D. T. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: AppleyM. H., editor. Adaptation Level Theory: A Symposium. New York: Academic Press; 1971. pp. 287302.
  • 14
    Cummins R. A., Nistico H. Maintaining life satisfaction: the role of positive cognitive bias. J Happiness Stud 2002; 3: 3769.
  • 15
    Diener E., Lucas R. Personality and well-being. In: KahnemanD., DienerE., SchwartzN., editors. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell-Sage; 1999. pp. 21329.
  • 16
    Sprangers M. A., Bartels M., Veenhoven R., Baas F., Martin N. G., Mosing M. et al. Which patient will feel down, which will be happy? The need to study the genetic disposition of emotional states. Qual Life Res 2010; Epub ahead of print 24 April.
  • 17
    Bhattacharyya M. R., Whitehead D. L., Rakhit R., Steptoe A. Depressed mood, positive affect, and heart rate variability in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med 2008; 70: 10207.