Determining the relative importance of the mechanisms of behavior change within Alcoholics Anonymous: a multiple mediator analysis
Article first published online: 19 SEP 2011
© 2011 The Authors, Addiction © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction
Volume 107, Issue 2, pages 289–299, February 2012
How to Cite
Kelly, J. F., Hoeppner, B., Stout, R. L. and Pagano, M. (2012), Determining the relative importance of the mechanisms of behavior change within Alcoholics Anonymous: a multiple mediator analysis. Addiction, 107: 289–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03593.x
- Issue published online: 17 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 19 SEP 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 14 SEP 2011 12:41PM EST
- Submitted 18 March 2011; initial review completed 19 May 2011; final version accepted 21 July 2011
- alcohol dependence;
- alcoholics anonymous;
- self-help groups;
- social network;
Aims Evidence indicates that Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) participation reduces relapse risk but less is known about the mechanisms through which AA confers this benefit. Initial studies indicate self-efficacy, negative affect, adaptive social networks and spiritual practices are mediators of this effect, but because these have been tested in isolation, their relative importance remains elusive. This study tested multiple mediators simultaneously to help determine the most influential pathways.
Design Prospective, statistically controlled, naturalistic investigation examined the extent to which these previously identified mechanisms mediated AA attendance effects on alcohol outcomes controlling for baseline outcome values, mediators, treatment, and other confounders.
Setting Nine clinical sites within the United States.
Participants Adults (n = 1726) suffering from alcohol use disorder (AUD) initially enrolled in a randomized study with two arms: aftercare (n = 774); and out-patient (n = 952) comparing three out-patient treatments (Project MATCH).
Measurements AA attendance during treatment; mediators at 9 months; and outcomes [percentage of days abstinent (PDA) and drinks per drinking day (DDD)] at 15 months.
Findings Among out-patients the effect of AA attendance on alcohol outcomes was explained primarily by adaptive social network changes and increases in social abstinence self-efficacy. Among more impaired aftercare patients, in addition to mediation through adaptive network changes and increases in social self-efficacy, AA lead to better outcomes through increasing spirituality/religiosity and by reducing negative affect. The degree to which mediators explained the relationship between AA and outcomes ranged from 43% to 67%.
Conclusion While Alcoholics Anonymous facilitates recovery by mobilizing several processes simultaneously, it is changes in social factors which appear to be of primary importance.