SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Caulkins J. P., Kilmer B., MacCoun R. J., Pacula R. L., Reuter P. Design considerations for legalizing cannabis: lessons inspired by analysis of California's Proposition 19. Addiction 2012; 107: 86571.
  • 2
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. III, p. 12. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.
  • 3
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. I. Chapter XVI, ‘Provincial Systems Examined’, Section 635. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.
  • 4
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. III, p. 311, Section 639. Appendixes, Bengal Memorandum p. 10; Bombay Memorandum p. 90 and Sind Memorandum p. 103. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.
  • 5
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. III. Section 342–324, pp. 129131; Bengal Memorandum, p. 13. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.
  • 6
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. III. Section 344, p. 131. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.
  • 7
    Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893–1894. Vol. III, p. 10. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation (NY & London) 1971.