Interventions to prevent substance use and risky sexual behaviour in young people: a systematic review
Article first published online: 11 FEB 2012
© 2011 The Authors, Addiction © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction
Volume 107, Issue 4, pages 733–747, April 2012
How to Cite
Jackson, C., Geddes, R., Haw, S. and Frank, J. (2012), Interventions to prevent substance use and risky sexual behaviour in young people: a systematic review. Addiction, 107: 733–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03751.x
- Issue published online: 28 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 11 FEB 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 7 DEC 2011 08:55AM EST
- Submitted 17 March 2011; initial review completed 27 April 2011; final version accepted 1 December 2011
- complex interventions;
- multiple risk behaviour;
- sexual behaviour;
- substance use;
- systematic review
Aims To identify and assess the effectiveness of experimental studies of interventions that report on multiple risk behaviour outcomes in young people.
Methods A systematic review was performed to identify experimental studies of interventions to reduce risk behaviour in adolescents or young adults and that reported on both any substance (alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug) use and sexual risk behaviour outcomes. Two authors reviewed studies independently identified through a comprehensive search strategy and assessed the quality of included studies. The report was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Results From 1129 papers, 18 experimental studies met our inclusion criteria, 13 of which were assigned a strong or moderate quality rating. The substantial heterogeneity between studies precluded the pooling of results to give summary estimates. Intervention effects were mixed, with most programmes having a significant effect on some outcomes, but not others. The most promising interventions addressed multiple domains (individual and peer, family, school and community) of risk and protective factors for risk behaviour. Programmes that addressed just one domain were generally less effective in preventing multiple risk behaviour.
Conclusions There is some, albeit limited, evidence that programmes to reduce multiple risk behaviours in school children can be effective, the most promising programmes being those that address multiple domains of influence on risk behaviour. Intervening in the mid-childhood school years may have an impact on later risk behaviour, but further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of this approach.