SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Background
  4. Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease
  5. Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease
  6. References

Infliximab, the chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody to tumour necrosis factor, is indicated for refractory luminal and fistulizing Crohn's disease and extra-intestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Recently, the active ulcerative colitis trials (ACT) studies have shown that infliximab is also efficacious to treat ulcerative colitis resistant to standard therapy. Induction with 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2 and 6 is advocated.

The response to infliximab is improved when concomitant immunosuppressive therapy is given. As the majority of patients will relapse if not retreated, a long-term strategy is necessary. Although episodic therapy can be used, the optimal strategy is systematic maintenance treatment with 5 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.) every 8 weeks. Long-term maintenance therapy with infliximab results in a reduction of the rate of complications, hospitalizations and surgeries associated with Crohn's disease.

Safety problems with the monoclonal antibody infliximab treatment mainly concern the formation of antibodies to infliximab, which may lead to infusion reactions, loss of response and serum sickness-like delayed infusion reactions. Latent tuberculosis needs to be screened for. The rate of other opportunistic infections is slightly increased mainly in patients treated concomitantly with immunosuppression. There is no evidence that malignancy rates in patients treated with antitumour necrosis factor strategies are increased.


Background

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Background
  4. Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease
  5. Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease
  6. References

The introduction of infliximab (Remicade Centocor, Malvern, PA, USA) has greatly improved our treatment options in Crohn's disease, and its impact on the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) promises to be equally important. Inflammatory bowel diseases are disabling bowel disorders and standard therapies until the late 90s were largely deficient. The inability of glucocorticosteroids to induce long-lasting remission has been well documented by population-based cohort studies in Crohn's disease as well as in ulcerative colitis.1–5 Immunosuppression with azathioprine/6-MP or methotrexate in contrast has long-term efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease but is of limited value for induction and benefits to less than half of the patients dependent or resistant to steroids.6–10

Population-based studies show that using these conventional therapies only 42% of the patients with Crohn's disease are symptom-free at 2 years after initial diagnosis and 12% after 10 years while 10% of the patients have continuously active disease in 2 years and 1% in 10 years.4 Relapsing or continuously active disease often leads to complications necessitating surgery, but resection of the inflamed bowel does not interrupt the progression of the disease. Even the increasing use of immunosuppression at an earlier stage of the disease does not seem to impact on the disease outcome. Cosnes et al. investigated the need for intestinal surgery in consecutive periods of 5 years form 1978 up to 2002. Although the 5-year cumulative probability of use of immunosuppressants increased from 0.13 to 0.56 the cumulative risk of intestinal surgery remained unchanged over time (from 0.35 to 0.34 in 5 years).11

The unmet therapeutic need is also sizable for patients with ulcerative colitis. The efficacy of azathioprine/6-MP has been less well documented for UC than for Crohn's disease. Ciclosporin is the only rescue therapy and carries major toxicities. For many patients years of suffering will eventually lead to proctocolectomy with or without ileo-anal pouch anastomosis. The adverse events associated with this intervention are significant and include a mortality rate of 1–3%. The quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pouch is suboptimal. While this operation is supposed to cure the disease, it is now well recognized that pouchitis is a true recurrence of UC in the pouch.

In conclusion, there is a great need for disease-modifying therapy for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

In this overview, we want to summarize the present state of infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and to examine whether this drug is a disease modifier. We want also to present practical strategies for the use of infliximab based on the literature data and own experience.

Infliximab (Remicade Centocor) is a chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody to tumour necrosis factor (TNF). It is composed of human constant and murine variable regions. The drug is intravenously administered over a 2-h period.

Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is a key pro-inflammatory cytokine in Crohn's disease and in other chronic inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthropathy and psoriasis. TNF-α is first produced as a 26-kDa transmembrane protein with an intracellular tail, which is cleaved by the metalloproteinase TACE (TNF-α converting enzyme) to be secreted as a 17-kDa soluble protein. This form aggregates to form trimers that interact with two receptors the p55 TNF receptor 1 and the p75 TNF receptor 2 to exert its action. TNF is produced mainly by activated macrophages and T lymphocytes among other cells. TNF induces many other pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1 and IL-6, enhances leucocyte migration by inducing expression of adhesion molecules by endothelial cells and leucocytes. TNF activates leucocytes, induces acute phase reactants and metalloproteinases, and inhibits apoptosis of inflammatory cells. The number of TNF-producing cells is greatly increased in the lamina propria in the bowel of patients with Crohn's disease 12–13 and increased concentrations of TNF have been found in the stools of children with Crohn's disease.14 TNF is also found in large amounts in the mucosa of patients with active ulcerative colitis.15

Infliximab binds specifically to human TNF-α with an association constant of 1010/M. Pharmacokinetics of infliximab after intravenous (i.v.) infusion is characterized by a half-life of 10 days.16 A dose-dependent maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of infliximab is found and the Cmax amounts to 118 μg/mL at a dose of 5 mg/kg after i.v. infusion. Clearance of infliximab from the circulation is 10 mL/h. In week 12 after infusion, infliximab levels are no longer detectable (median concentration <0.1 μg/mL) with the 5 mg/kg dose but using a dose of 10 mg/kg i.v. therapeutic concentrations is maintained for a longer period. The exact serum level of infliximab needed to exert its therapeutic effect has not been determined up to now.

The effect of infliximab on the acute phase inflammatory response as assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 levels is very rapid. CRP levels and IL-6 levels normalize by 2 weeks but start to rise again in a proportion of patients from week 8 on.

The mechanism of action of infliximab is not well understood. Neutralization of soluble TNF is clearly not enough as drugs like etanercept (p75 fusion protein) and onercept (p55 receptor) which bind TNF efficiently do not have clinical activity. This effect of infliximab is probably achieved by elimination of inflammatory cells expressing TNF-α on their membranes 17 mainly by induction of apoptosis of T cells and monocytes.18–21 Recently, Shen et al. showed that not only infliximab, but also the human monoclonal antibody to TNF adalimumab (Humira-Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) induces apoptosis of monocytes.22 The same authors also used a human–mouse chimeric model to demonstrate caspase dependent apoptosis of lymphocytes and monocytes with infliximab.23 In this human–mouse chimeric model, the effect of infliximab was independent of Fcγ-R binding or complement activation showing that the contribution of complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) to the elimination of inflammatory cells is probably very limited. CDP 870 which is a pegylated Fab'fragment of a humanized anti-TNF antibody is also effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease 24–25, although the molecule does not induce apoptosis of inflammatory cells.

Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Background
  4. Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease
  5. Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease
  6. References

An i.v. infusion of infliximab over 2 h is efficacious therapy for refractory luminal Crohn's disease. In the pivotal Targan study26, 65% of patients with active Crohn's disease responded at 4 weeks to doses of 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg of infliximab vs. 17% for placebo and 33% of patients achieved remission vs. 4% for placebo. There was no dose–response effect observed. Thirty-seven per cent of the patients suffered a relapse by week 12, when not retreated. In the large (n = 573) Accent I trial27, 58% of the patients responded by week 2 and 27% of the patients achieved remission. A loading dose of three infusions of 5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks resulted in a significantly higher response rate at 10 weeks (69% vs. 59%, P = 0.035) than a single infusion at week 0 but the improved benefit was limited.

In the first maintenance study 28, patients induced with infliximab received 10 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks or placebo with infusions in 0, 12, 20, 28 and 36 weeks. The interval for the prophylactic infusions of 8 weeks was chosen based on the pharmacokinetic properties of infliximab. At 44 weeks, 62% of the patients had maintained response and 53% remission with repeated infliximab infusions whereas only 37% were still responding when receiving placebo with 20% patients still being in remission (P = 0.013).

The Accent I maintenance trial included three groups of patients. Placebo patients received 5 mg/kg infliximab i.v. at week 0 and placebo at 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38 and 46 weeks. The 5 mg/kg group received 5 mg/kg at week 0 as well as at each of the other time points. The 10 mg/kg group received 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and 10 mg/kg at weeks 14, 22, 30, 38 and 46. The proportion of patients in response at 2 weeks that were still in remission at 30 weeks was 21% for placebo, 44% for infliximab 5 mg/kg and 45% for infliximab 10 mg/kg. The remission rates off steroids in 54 weeks were 9% for placebo vs. 29% for the combined infliximab treatment groups.27

Analysis of outcome in all patients included in the Accent I trial,29 including non-responders in 2 weeks and allowing cross over to higher doses, i.e. to episodic 5 mg/kg in the placebo group, episodic step up to 10 mg/kg in the 5 mg/kg group and to 15 mg/kg in the 10 mg/kg group from 14 weeks on showed that the clinical remission and response rates in the combined (5 and 10 mg/kg) scheduled strategy groups (41% and 63% respectively) were not significantly better than those in the episodic 5 mg/kg strategy group (35% and 56%, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of patients on steroids at baseline (51% for all groups) was able to stop glucocorticosteroids and remained free from this drug when treated with systematic 5 (44%) and 10 mg/kg (47%) infliximab than when treated episodically with infliximab 5 mg/kg (29%).

In the Accent I study, a sub-analysis addressed the impact of the different treatment strategies on important outcome data such as mucosal healing, hospitalizations and surgeries. It was shown that with a loading dose of infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 better healing was achieved at 10 weeks than with one infusion in week 0. With systematic maintenance every 8 weeks, significantly higher healing rates were achieved at 54 weeks (44%) than with episodic therapy (18%). Significantly, fewer Crohn's disease-related hospitalizations occurred over the 54 weeks period in patients undergoing systematic maintenance therapy (24 events per 100 patients) than in patients treated episodically (38 per 100 patients; P = 0.023).

In the trial, 7% of the patients treated episodically required intestinal surgery when compared with 3% for patients receiving systematic maintenance therapy (P < 0.05). These data suggest that infliximab therapy indeed changes the course of Crohn's disease long term.

Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Background
  4. Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease
  5. Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease
  6. References

In the first placebo-controlled trial by Present et al.30 in fistulizing Crohn's disease, a series of three infusions of 5 mg/kg of infliximab at weeks 0, 2 and 6 resulted in a response (≥50% reduction of draining fistulae) at two consecutive evaluations in 68% of patients and in 56% with 10 mg/kg with complete cessation of drainage in 55% and 38% of the patients, respectively. The placebo response rate was 26% and complete response rate 13%. The median time to loss of response without re-treatment was 12 weeks.

In the Accent II study 31, 195/282 (69%) responders to a loading dose of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 were randomized at 14 weeks to receive infusions of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks or placebo through 46 weeks.

The median time to loss of response was significantly longer for patients who received infliximab maintenance (>40 weeks) when compared with those who received placebo maintenance (14 weeks, P < 0.001). At week 54, 23% of patients on placebo maintained a response and 19% a complete response when compared with 46% and 36%, respectively, for patients maintained on infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks (both P < 0.01).

Sixty-one per cent of the patients who crossed over from placebo to infliximab 5 mg/kg and from 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg because of loss of response re-established fistula response.

A sub-analysis of the Accent II 32 study offered some evidence for efficacy of infliximab for closing rectovaginal fistulae.

Data on the efficacy of infliximab to change the long-term outcome of fistulizing disease are scarce.

Healing of the fistula tracks during therapy with infliximab has been studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)33, 34 and endoscopic ultrasonography.35 Van Assche et al.33 reported that active inflammation associated with fistula tracks improves greatly short term but that fistula tracks persist long term with varying degrees of residual inflammation in patients treated episodically with infliximab for perianal-fistulizing disease. Similar findings were reported by Bell et al.34 Both studies also showed that MRI identifies clinically silent sepsis, which may lead to clinical abscesses during therapy.

In the Accent II study 31, patients with fistulae who responded to induction therapy by week 14 and then received systematic maintenance therapy with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks had less hospitalizations (11 events per 100 patients) than patients treated with placebo (31 per 100 patients; P < 0.05). They also underwent significantly less surgical procedures (65 vs. 126 per 100 patients; P < 0.05). These data suggest that infliximab also changes the long-term course of fistulizing Crohn's disease.

Can we predict response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease?

The efficacy to induce response and remission both in luminal disease and in fistulizing Crohn's disease reported in the placebo controlled trials has been confirmed in many open cohorts of patients throughout the world.36–42 About 30% of patients with refractory Crohn's disease have consistently been found to be resistant to infliximab therapy. Moreover, not all responders display a full response.

It is important to identify reliable predictors for response to infliximab in order to optimize the use of the drug and to gain insight in the differences in pathogenesis of different disease forms. A number of clinical, biological and genetic risk factors have been investigated. We report only these factors which have been shown by at least two independent randomized-controlled trials or large cohort studies to predict the outcome of infliximab therapy.

Patients with biologically active inflammation as witnessed by increased CRP have the best chance of responding to infliximab therapy.29, 43 Patients with non-stricturing disease and with pure colonic disease respond better to infliximab therapy.44, 45 Patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression 45–47 are more likely to respond both short- and long-term to infliximab therapy. The Odds ratio to respond when patients are taking immunosuppressants was 3 (95% CI 2–5) in the large cohort by Vermeire et al.45 and 7 (95% CI 3–10) in the study by Arnott et al.47 Also, in the cohort of Parsi et al., 46 74% of patients taking immunosuppression responded to infliximab compared with 39% of those not on immunosuppressive therapy (P = 0.007). Whether this additive effect is because of improved combined efficacy or to suppression of the formation of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) is not clear. Smokers are less likely to respond to infliximab.46,47 The value of smoking and immunosuppression has not been identified as clinical risk factors in all studies.48

Infliximab is highly effective in achieving improvement and inducing and maintaining remission in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease in fistulizing as well as luminal disease.49–53 It seems that children with early Crohn's disease have a higher chance of prolonged response to infliximab than children with longstanding Crohn's disease.52 This suggests that early introduction of the drug might be particularly efficacious to change the long-term course of Crohn's disease. Borrelli et al.53 also showed in their cohort of patients that treatment with infliximab induces weight gain and reverses growth failure in children especially when they are maintained on the drug.

Besides CRP, other biomarkers have been proposed but not confirmed as predictors of response to infliximab. Specific predictors of response in fistulizing disease have not been identified. In an open study from Calgary, the presence of a rectovaginal fistula was a poor prognostic indicator for successful infliximab therapy 54, but this was not suggested by the Accent II study. In the large Italian cohort study48, the efficacy of infliximab was less in the treatment of other fistulae when compared with perianal fistulae.

Several genetic factors have been studied and interesting data have been gathered but genetic predictors need to be confirmed in different cohorts of patients.

Infliximab for ulcerative colitis

In Crohn's disease, the inflammatory response is characterized by the presence of T-helper 1 cytokines including IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF whereas in ulcerative colitis there seems to be an excess of T-helper 2 cytokines including IL-5 and -13 while IL-12 is lacking. However IFN-γ is also abundantly present as well as TNF. The results of open studies on the use of the monoclonal chimeric IgG1 antibody to TNF, infliximab in ulcerative colitis, were conflicting. In the small placebo-controlled study by Sands et al., 55 four of eight patients (50%) treated with infliximab responded at 2 weeks and none of the three placebo-treated patients.

In the study by Probert et al., 56 remission was achieved with infliximab in three of 23 (13%) patients with steroid-refractory UC and in 1/19 (5%) treated with placebo at 2 weeks and the rates were 39% and 30%, respectively, at 6 weeks (NS).

In a randomized study 57, Ochsenkuhn et al. investigated the efficacy of infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 to induce remission in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis not refractory to glucocorticosteroids in comparison with high doses of glucocorticosteroids (2 mg/kg). Only 13 (six received infliximab and seven prednisolone) patients were included in this study. Five of six patients responded to infliximab and six of seven to prednisolone at 3 and 13 weeks, respectively.

Definitive evidence for the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of UC was offered by the two large placebo-controlled clinical trials ACT-1 58 and ACT-2.59

In ACT-1, 69% and 62% of patients receiving infliximab 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, at weeks 0, 2 and 6, were in clinical response at week 8, compared with 37% of those who received placebo (P < 0.002 for both comparisons). In ACT-2, 65% and 69% of patients receiving infliximab 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, were in clinical response at week 8, compared with 26% of those who received placebo (P < 0.001 for both comparisons).

In both studies, the proportions of patients who achieved clinical response at weeks 8, 30 or 54 (ACT-1) or clinical remission at weeks 30 or 54 (ACT-1) were several-fold higher among infliximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients. The full publication of the data is awaited.

Infliximab seems also efficacious as rescue therapy to avoid colectomy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis. In a placebo-controlled pilot study, Jarnerot et al. found that 71% of patients resistant to steroids escaped colectomy in 3 months when treated with infliximab vs. 33% of the patients treated with placebo (P = 0.017).60

Data are scarce also for treatment of indeterminate colitis with infliximab. In an open retrospective study reported by Papadakis et al. 61 of infliximab treatment in medically refractory indeterminate colitis, 14 of 20 patients (70%) had a complete response to infliximab 5 mg/kg and two patients a partial response. Four of the 14 responders had to step up to 10 mg/kg infliximab because of attenuation of the response to 5 mg/kg. It was striking that 10 patients were in the course of follow-up reclassified as Crohn's disease and two as ulcerative colitis.

Infliximab therapy for systemic manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases

Extra-intestinal manifestations occur in up to 40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. These include mainly skin lesions, eye disease, joint manifestations and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Infliximab seems efficacious for all systemic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease whether associated with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis or even if there is no evidence of underlying inflammatory bowel disease.

The only placebo-controlled trial of infliximab therapy for pyoderma gangrenosum showed short-term efficacy of infliximab 5 mg/kg at 2 weeks in 6/13 (46%) of patients vs. 1/17 (6%) of placebo-treated patients (P = 0.025).62 Infliximab was found to be efficacious for the management of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum a particularly disabling complication of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.63

Eye abnormalities associated with inflammatory bowel disease are episcleritis, scleritis and uveitis. Uveitis associated with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis is predominantly bilateral, posterior, insidious in onset but chronic in duration. This contrasts with the uveitis associated with spondylarthropathy, which is mostly anterior, unilateral, sudden in onset and limited in duration.64 Infliximab is efficacious for treating both types of uveitis.65–66 The spectrum of joint disorders associated with inflammatory bowel disease includes peripheral arthropathy, which evolves in parallel with the activity of the bowel disease and sacroiliitis or ankylosing spondylitis which, although associated with inflammatory bowel disease, has a rather independent course. Infliximab relieves peripheral joint problems together with the bowel symptoms. Axial manifestations or spondylarthropathy associated with Crohn's disease also respond well to infliximab.67 Moreover, both infliximab and etanercept are very efficacious to improve disease activity, functional indices and quality of life in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.68–70 There are also data suggesting that these strategies prevent functional loss and progress of spine lesions.

In an unpublished pilot trial, infliximab did not improve liver abnormalities in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

How important is the immunogenicity problem with infliximab?

Infliximab is a chimeric antibody and may be associated with the formation of ATI formerly called human antichimeric antibodies (HACA). The detection of the antibody depends on the sensitivity and on the specifications of the assay used, the timing of measurement of the antibodies. With the present assays, ATI can mostly not be measured as long as infliximab is present in the serum of the patient.

In general, it can be stated that ATI interfere with the safety and efficacy of the drug. Immunogenicity leads to clinical problems especially when infliximab is administered episodically.

In the episodic re-treatment arm of the Accent I study, 71 the cumulative incidence of ATI as measured with the Centocor assay amounted also to 30% through 72 weeks, which was significantly higher than the 10% and 7% in the group of patients treated with systematic treatment with 5 or 10 mg/kg infliximab infusion every 8 weeks. In the episodic treatment arm, ATI impaired the kinetics of the drug with a more rapid reduction in serum infliximab concentrations from postinfusion peak levels and a reduction in the magnitude and duration of clinical response. The presence of ATI was associated with a 12% increase in infusion reactions. Overall patients receiving immunomodulators had a lower incidence of ATI through the groups (10% vs. 18%) than patients not receiving immunosuppressants. However, in the overall populations of the trial similar proportions of antibody-positive, -negative and inconclusive patients achieved clinical response (64%, 62% and 65%) and clinical remission (41%, 39% and 48%) at 54 weeks.71

In open cohorts of patients treated with infliximab in an episodic ‘on flare’ manner, the formation of ATI was found to be an important clinical problem.

Baert et al. 72 detected ATI in 38 of 125 (61%) patients and Farrell et al. 73 reported ATI in 19 of 53 patients (36%). In the studies by Baert et al. 72 and Farrell et al. 73, it was clearly demonstrated that the formation of ATI was associated with the occurrence of infusion reactions, lower postinfusion infliximab serum levels and with a shortened duration of response. The formation of ATI was decreased by concomitant therapy with immunosuppressants. Azathioprine and methotrexate are equally effective to counteract the formation of ATI.74

How are we using infliximab in the clinic?

The present indications for infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease are summarized in Table 1. For control of luminal disease, we use one 5-mg/kg i.v. infusion followed by maintenance infusions every 8 weeks. A three dose induction regimen with i.v. infusion of 5 mg/kg infliximab at 0, 2 and 6 weeks is only marginally more efficacious than a single infusion. If a patient does not respond to the first infusion, we will mostly repeat the infusion after 4 weeks. If he does not respond to the second infusion or if he did not respond to a loading schedule, we will not use the drug further in this patient. For fistulizing Crohn's disease, a loading dose of infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks is generally used. Fistulizing disease necessitates always a medical surgical approach from the onset. Many patients will need drainage of abscesses, placement of setons, fistulotomy, advancement flap plasty and sphincter repair. If setons are in place, they should be kept until the first infusions have been administered and can then be removed when maintenance therapy is carried out. Drainage of all sepsis prior to start of infliximab therapy is mandatory. It is strongly recommended that patients treated with infliximab continue their immunosuppressants or are started on one of these drugs.

Table 1.  Indications for induction and maintenance infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
DefinitePotentialNo
Refractory luminal (including upper GI) Crohn's disease Steroid-dependent Crohn's  disease Refractory fistulizing Crohn's disease Ulcerative colitis Systemic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease  Ankylosing spondylitis and sacroiliitis  Pyoderma gangrenosum  Chronic uveitis  Metastatic Crohn's diseaseFirst line therapy Indeterminate colitis Refractory pouchitisFibrostenosis only Refractory anemia in inflammatory bowel disease Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Infliximab can be used in different settings long term. These include (i) infliximab every 8 weeks maintenance as monotherapy, (ii) infliximab every 8 weeks with concomitant immunosuppression maintenance, (iii) infliximab episodic with immunosuppression maintenance and (iv) infliximab as a bridge to immunosuppression.

There is no doubt that after induction with infliximab maintenance with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks is the optimal regimen for patients treated for refractory luminal or fistulizing Crohn's disease. There is no need to wait for a new flares to re-administer, there is lower risk of immunogenicity, there is better mucosal healing and the improvement in quality of life is maintained long term. There is also evidence from the Accent I study that systematic maintenance therapy with infliximab is superior to episodic therapy to reduce hospitalizations and surgeries over the period of 1 year of treatment. In all patients who tolerate the drugs, an immunosuppressant should be maintained when the patient is already on the drug or added at the start of infliximab. It is not clear whether the combination should be maintained throughout. Preliminary data from an immunosuppression discontinuation study seem to indicate that immunosuppression may be stopped after 6 months without risk for earlier relapse.75

From the Accent I and II studies, we know that up to 30–50% of patients treated with infliximab every 8 weeks lose response in the course of 1 year following the successful induction of improvement or remission. This loss of response may be because of the formation of ATI, to rapid clearance of the drug unrelated to immunogenicity or maybe because of the increase of other pro-inflammatory molecules. This loss of response can be overcome by the increase of the dose of infliximab. In the Accent I study, increase to 10 mg/kg in patients with luminal Crohn's disease restored response in 90% of the patients who lost response to 5 mg/kg. Similarly, in the Accent II study, increase to 10 mg/kg in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease restored fistula response in 57% when draining of fistulae recurred during the maintenance therapy with 5 mg/kg.

The efficacy of dose increase to overcome loss of response has been largely confirmed in clinical practice. Another way to deal with the problem of loss of response is to decrease the interval between infusions and administer 5-mg/kg infliximab every 4–6 weeks instead of every 8 weeks. The strategy will be decided based on the practicalities of drug acquisition.

Infliximab can also be used for induction of remission as a bridge to the action of an immunosuppressant. In that setting, infliximab is used for induction in patients who are mostly resistant to or dependent on glucocorticosteroids and who have not failed to respond to immunosuppressants in the past. There is not much evidence that this is an effective strategy.

The GETAID group 76 has investigated the potential of infliximab as a bridge to immunosuppression in patients with steroid dependence for more than 6 months. Patients were treated with infliximab at 0, 2 and 6 weeks or placebo together with azathioprine or 6-MP and followed for 1 year. The results of the study have not been published in full but the data show that although the combination of infliximab induction and long-term azathioprine is more effective than azathioprine alone there is loss of response over time and that the majority of patients will require rescue therapy also in the infliximab-azathioprine arm. The rates for remission and off steroids were 75% (infliximab) vs. 38% (placebo) P < 0.0001 at 12 weeks, 57% (I) vs. 29% (P) P = 0.003 at 24 weeks and 40% (I) vs. 22% (P) (P = 0.04) at 52 weeks.

The preliminary data from the Benelux step-up/top-down trial seem to suggest a role for infliximab for bridging to immunosuppression. Induction therapy with infliximab with maintenance with azathioprine resulted in a remission rate without steroids in 75% at 6 months vs. 41% for step-up therapy (P = 0.006).77 The details of this study are awaited for.

An important argument used to advocate episodic treatment is the lower cost. When we look at series however where episodic therapy is used, it appears that the mean interval between episodic infusions is between 9 and 14 weeks in patients that need re-treatment. This is not so very different from the 8 weeks used in the systematic maintenance schedule. The decreased cost with episodic therapy is frequently offset by the problems of infusion reactions, of loss of response with the necessity to increase the dose of the drug or (and) to decrease the dosage interval. Moreover successful therapy with infliximab may decrease the direct as well as the indirect costs of the disease not including the cost of drug acquisition. This has been suggested by three retrospective analyses.78–80 There are a number of contra-indications to the use of infliximab. The drug should not be used in the presence of active sepsis or abscess or in patients with active tuberculosis. Also, multiple sclerosis and severe heart failure and a history of optical neuritis or malignancy especially lymphoma are contraindications. The drug should be stopped in case of uncontrolled infusion reactions or intestinal obstruction.

Infliximab for ever and ever?

There are no stopping rules for infliximab therapy.

There is also no controlled study data on infliximab therapy beyond 1 year but experienced centres have many patients who are treated with infliximab for up to 7 years with excellent efficacy and safety.

We use the following strategies. In patients who were not on immunosuppression, we will attempt to use infliximab as bridge therapy and give only induction therapy. If the patient does well, we will not repeat infliximab. If a patient relapses, we will retreat and maintain with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.

In patients who have failed immunosuppression, we will induce with infliximab and concomitant immunosuppression and continue infliximab every 8 weeks for at least 1 year.

When in such patient the treatment goal is reached, e.g. the discontinuation of glucocorticosteroids with maintained remission or complete external healing of fistulae, we may try to discontinue infliximab and continue immunosuppression and see whether the disease stays in remission. If the disease relapses, treatment is resumed with infusions every 8 weeks long term.

For extra-intestinal manifestations of the disease, we will use infliximab until the signs have disappeared in the case of skin or eye manifestations and then we will discontinue therapy while keeping the patients on immunosuppression. In the case of joint problems, we will always maintain with infliximab therapy every 8 weeks.

Safety of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

The most common adverse effects with infliximab are related to the formation of ATI. Acute infusion reactions are mostly easy to deal with and are treated with slowing of the infusion and administration of antihistamines and (or) hydrocortisone. In patients who have suffered infusion reactions, we will use prophylactic hydrocortisone 250 mg i.v. 30 min before each subsequent infusion.

Delayed infusion reactions also called serum sickness-like reactions are treated with high doses of steroids for 4–7 days. Patients having suffered delayed reactions can be re-treated with infliximab but need prophylaxis with prednisolone 40 mg/day for 2 days prior to and during 5–7 days after each infusion. However, the response to therapy is mostly lost in these patients and these patients will benefit from switching to the fully human antibody. After a drug-free interval of more than 14 weeks, prophylaxis with hydrocortisone prior to infliximab infusion is recommended in all patients to avoid infusion reactions.

Infections occur commonly in patients with chronic diseases treated with several potentially toxic drugs. In clinical studies, 36% of patients treated with infliximab and 28% of patients treated with placebo had infections that required therapy (PSUR 11).81

Respiratory tract infections are more common in patients treated with infliximab than with standard therapies, but these respond well to supportive therapy and antibiotics.

The rate of serious infections in placebo-controlled clinical trials in Crohn's disease and RA in patients treated with infliximab (6%) was not higher than in patients treated with placebo (7%). In a large cohort study82 in 500 consecutive patients treated at the Mayo Clinic, infliximab-related infections were found in 8% including 20 patients with serious infections: two patients had fatal sepsis, eight had pneumonia (two were fatal), six viral infections, two abdominal abscess, one cellulitis and one histoplasmosis.

Infliximab can be used safely in the perioperative period in patients undergoing bowel resections. There is no increased risk for severe infections or other complications.83, 84

There is an increased risk of activation of latent tuberculosis and less of other opportunistic infections associated with therapy with infliximab. By February 2005, 709 cases of tuberculosis have been reported including 591 spontaneous reports, 86 trial reports and 32 registry reports. The median time from the first infliximab infusion to the onset of symptoms was 123 days. There were a total of 62 reports with tuberculosis as the underlying cause of death.81 Educational programs have resulted in a gradual decrease in the reporting rate of tuberculosis. All patients who will undergo treatment with an anti-TNF agent should be screened for latent tuberculosis. A careful interview for a history of tuberculosis or exposure to tuberculosis as well as a chest X ray are mandatory prior to start of infliximab therapy. There is a lot of discussion on the usefulness of the skin test for screening. A positive skin test mostly is indicative of latent tuberculosis even if the patient has received BCG vaccination. False negative tests occur in patients treated with steroids or immunosuppression. Patients with positive skin test should receive prophylactic therapy with isoniazide 300 mg/day for 6 months and pyridoxin once weekly. This therapy should be given for 2–4 weeks before the first infusion of infliximab is given. Physicians should adhere to the recommendations for TB screening and treatment as proposed by national scientific organizations and authorities.

Mild-to-moderate increases in liver enzymes have been rarely seen in patients treated with infliximab. Severe hepatic disease has been observed in <0.08/1000 patients and a causal relationship with infliximab has not been established.81

Infliximab may worsen congestive heart failure, and should be used in patients with this concomitant condition only after the consideration of other treatment options. Infliximab and other agents that inhibit TNF have been associated in rare cases with optic neuritis, seizure and new onset or exacerbation of clinical symptoms and/or radiographic evidence of central nervous system demyelinating disorders, including multiple sclerosis. Infliximab therapy does not predispose to progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy. Infliximab therapy is frequently associated with autoimmunity with the formation of antinuclear antibodies and antibodies to double-stranded DNA. Drug-induced lupus reactions without end organ damage occur rarely. Antinuclear antibodies are associated with female sex and with the occurrence of papulosquamous or butterfly rash.85 The development of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) is no reason to discontinue therapy with infliximab.

In the CD and RA trials, six lymphomas were diagnosed for a follow-up of 4148 patient years vs. 0 for 691 placebo patient years. All lymphomas occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. Four of these lymphomas occurred in patients with RA. In RA, the background incidence of lymphoma is increased in comparison with the general population. In a prospective study in 18 572 patients with RA who were enrolled in a US National Data Bank (NDB) for rheumatic diseases, a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 3 (95% CI 1–5) in comparison with the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data base was reported for the use of infliximab86 whereas the overall SIR was 2 (95% CI 2–5).

Data for Crohn's disease are scarce. There is lack of evidence at this stage that there is an increased risk of lymphoma associated with the use of infliximab in Crohn's disease. It is also unlikely that good quality controlled data will ever be available making treatment registries especially important.

Mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab is not increased in comparison with patients not treated with this drug and mortality is mostly the consequence of complications of the disease.

The mortality rate in the infliximab trials with 3 years poststudy follow-up was 2% for patients treated with infliximab and 4% for placebo-treated patients. In postmarketing, surveillance infection accounted for 37% of deaths and neoplasms for 23%.81 Alarming reports on mortality because of infections or lymphomas must be interpreted with caution as a number of patients in such observational studies have often been treated off label for life-threatening conditions.87–88

Data on the safety of infliximab during pregnancy are scarce. Large antibodies do not pass through the placenta during the first two trimesters of pregnancy and therefore the risk for the foetus seems small. Small series of women who gave birth to a child after having been exposed to infliximab during pregnancy 89 do not show excess pregnancy complications or peri-partal problems. No increase in congenital abnormalities was observed.

Infliximab has also been intentionally used to control Crohn's disease during pregnancy.90 The authors expect that the benefits of infliximab in achieving and maintaining remission in mothers with Crohn's disease may outweigh the risk to the foetus of exposure to the drug. There is no data on the effects of infliximab therapy on lactation.

In our practice, we will continue systematic infliximab q8 during the first 20 weeks of the pregnancy and then interrupt therapy while maintaining azathioprine in women with aggressive Crohn's disease. After delivery, the decision to restart infliximab is taken on an individual basis. In women with history of disabling peri-anal disease, therapy with infliximab will always be restarted after the delivery.

Important data concerning the safety of infliximab therapy will be gathered using large registries. The TREAT registry in North America includes already more than 6000 patients. Half of the patients are treated with infliximab and the other half with Crohn's disease medications not including biologics. A preliminary analysis shows that serious infections and mortality in Crohn's disease is related especially to the use of steroids and not to the use of infliximab. Up to present, the rate of lymphoma or overall cancer was not higher in the cohort of patients treated with infliximab than in the patients treated with conventional treatments.

A similar registry in Europe (ENCORE) is actively recruiting patients, but data are not yet available.

Anti-TNF strategies in inflammatory bowel disease: conclusions

The advent of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease has been very beneficial for our patients. In the near future, other anti-TNF antibodies will become available with more convenient route of administration (SC) and probably lower immunogenicity. The efficacy of these drugs in comparison with infliximab is not yet clear. The ideal strategy, however, would be an oral small molecule with similar efficacy but lacking the drawbacks of the parenteral administration route and the problems of immunogenicity.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Background
  4. Infliximab for refractory luminal Crohn's disease
  5. Infliximab for Fistulizing Crohn's disease
  6. References
  • 1
    Munkholm P, Langholz E, Davidsen M, Binder V. Frequency of glucocorticoid resistance and dependency in Crohn's disease. Gut 1994; 35: 3602.
  • 2
    Faubion Jr WA, Loftus Jr EV, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Sandborn WJ. The natural history of corticosteroid therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 25560.
  • 3
    Lofberg R, Rutgeerts P, Malchow H, et al. Budesonide prolongs time to relapse in ileal and ileocaecal Crohn's disease. A placebo controlled one year study. Gut 1996; 39: 826.
  • 4
    Munkholm P, Langholz E, Davidsen M, Binder V. Disease activity courses in a regional cohort of Crohn's disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995; 30: 699706.
  • 5
    Lapidus A, Bernell O, Hellers G, Lofberg R. Clinical course of colorectal Crohn's disease: a 35-year follow-up study of 507 patients. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: 115160.
  • 6
    Present DH, Korelitz BI, Wisch N, Glass JL, Sachar DB, Pasternack BS. Treatment of Crohn's disease with 6-mercaptopurine. A long-term, randomized, double-blind study. N Engl J Med 1980; 302: 9817.
  • 7
    Candy S, Wright J, Gerber M, Adams G, Gerig M, Goodman R. A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in the management of Crohn's disease. Gut 1995; 37: 6748.
  • 8
    Bouhnik Y, Lemann M, Mary JY, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Lancet 1996; 347: 2159.
  • 9
    Feagan BG, Rochon J, Fedorak RN, et al. Methotrexate for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The North American Crohn's Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 3301.
  • 10
    Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, Irvine EJ, et al. A comparison of methotrexate with placebo for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. North American Crohn's Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 162732.
  • 11
    Cosnes J, Nion-Larmurier I, Beaugerie L, Afchain P, Tiret E, Gendre JP. Impact of the increasing use of immunosuppressants in Crohn's disease on the need for intestinal surgery. Gut 2005; 54: 23741.
  • 12
    Breese E, Michie C, Nicholls S, et al. tumor necrosis factor alpha-producing cells in the intestinal mucosa of children with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 145566.
  • 13
    Reinecker HC, Steffen M, Witthoeft T, et al. Enhanced secretion of tumour necrosis factor-alpha IL-6, and IL-1 beta by isolated lamina propria mononuclear cells from patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Clin Exp Immunol 1993; 94: 17481.
  • 14
    Nicholls S, Stephens S, Braegger CP, Walker-Smith JA, MacDonald TT. Cytokines in stools of children with inflammatory bowel disease or infective diarrhoea. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 75760.
  • 15
    Tsukada Y, Nakamura T, Iimura M, Iizuka BE, Hayashi N. Cytokine profile in colonic mucosa of ulcerative colitis correlates with disease activity and response to granulocytapheresis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 28208.
    Direct Link:
  • 16
    Cornillie F, Shealy D, D'Haens G, et al. Infliximab induces potent anti-inflammatory and local immunomodulatory activity but no systemic immune suppression in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 46373.
  • 17
    Baert FJ, D'Haens GR, Peeters M, et al. tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (infliximab) therapy profoundly down-regulates the inflammation in Crohn's ileocolitis. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 228.
  • 18
    Lugering A, Schmidt M, Lugering N, Pauels HG, Domschke W, Kucharzik T. Infliximab induces apoptosis in monocytes from patients with chronic active Crohn's disease by using a caspase-dependent pathway. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 114557.
  • 19
    ten Hove T, van Montfrans C, Peppelenbosch MP, van Deventer SJ. Infliximab treatment induces apoptosis of lamina propria T lymphocytes in Crohn's disease. Gut 2002; 50: 20611.
  • 20
    Van den Brande JM, Braat H, van den Brink GR, et al. Infliximab but not etanercept induces apoptosis in lamina propria T-lymphocytes from patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 177485.
  • 21
    Ringheam M, Markowitz J, Chawla A, Daum F, Lin X, Silver J. Effects of Infliximab on apoptosis and reverse signaling of monocytes. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: A101.
  • 22
    Shen C, Van Assche G, Colpaert S, et al. Adalimumab induces apoptosis of human monocytes: a comparative study with infliximab and etanercept. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 2518.
  • 23
    Shen C, Maerten P, Geboes K, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P, Ceuppens JL. Infliximab induces apoptosis of monocytes and T lymphocytes in a human–mouse chimeric model. Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 2509.
  • 24
    Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al. An engineered human antibody to TNF (CDP571) for active Crohn's disease: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 13308.
  • 25
    Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Katz S, et al. Etanercept for active Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 108894.
  • 26
    Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJ, et al. A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn's disease. Crohn's Disease cA2 Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 102935.
  • 27
    Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 15419.
  • 28
    Rutgeerts P, D'Haens G, Targan S, et al. And safety of retreatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) to maintain remission in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 7619.
  • 29
    Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 40213.
  • 30
    Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1398405.
  • 31
    Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 9346.
  • 32
    Sands BE, Blank MA, Patel K, van Deventer SJ. Long-term treatment of rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease: response to infliximab in the ACCENT II Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 91220.
  • 33
    Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 3329.
  • 34
    Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, Williams AB, Wiesel P, Kamm MA. Response of fistulating Crohn's disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 38793.
  • 35
    van Bodegraven AA, Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Meuwissen SG. Endosonographic evidence of persistence of Crohn's disease-associated fistulas after infliximab treatment, irrespective of clinical response. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 3945; discussion 45–6.
  • 36
    Ricart E, Panaccione R, Loftus EV, Tremaine WJ, Sandborn WJ. Infliximab for Crohn's disease in clinical practice at the Mayo Clinic: the first 100 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 7229.
    Direct Link:
  • 37
    Mortimore M, Gibson PR, Selby WS, Radford-Smith GL, Florin TH. Early Australian experience with infliximab, a chimeric antibody against tumour necrosis factor-alpha, in the treatment of Crohn's disease: is its efficacy augmented by steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy? The Infliximab User Group. Intern Med J 2001; 31: 14650.
  • 38
    Cohen RD. Efficacy and safety of repeated infliximab infusions for Crohn's disease: 1-year clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2001; 7 (Suppl. 1): S1722.
  • 39
    Hommes DW, van de Heisteeg BH, van der Spek M, Bartelsman JF, van Deventer SJ. Infliximab treatment for Crohn's disease: one-year experience in a Dutch academic hospital. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2002; 8: 816.
  • 40
    Sample C, Bailey RJ, Todoruk D, et al. Clinical experience with infliximab for Crohn's disease: the first 100 patients in Edmonton, Alberta. Can J Gastroenterol 2002; 16: 16570.
  • 41
    van Balkom BP, Schoon EJ, Stockbrugger RW, et al. Effects of anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy on the quality of life in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 11017.
  • 42
    Ardizzone S, Colombo E, Maconi G, et al. Infliximab in treatment of Crohn's disease: the Milan experience. Dig Liver Dis 2002; 34: 4118.
  • 43
    Louis E, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P, et al. A positive response to infliximab in Crohn disease: association with a higher systemic inflammation before treatment but not with -308 TNF gene polymorphism. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 81824.
  • 44
    Lichtenstein GR, Stein R, Lewis JD, Deren J. Response to infliximab is decreased in the presence of intestinal strictures in patients with Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: A2691.
  • 45
    Vermeire S, Louis E, Carbonez A, et al. Demographic and clinical parameters influencing the short-term outcome of anti-tumor necrosis factor (infliximab) treatment in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 235763.
    Direct Link:
  • 46
    Parsi MA, Achkar JP, Richardson S, et al. Predictors of response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 70713.
  • 47
    Arnott ID, McNeill G, Satsangi J. An analysis of factors influencing short-term and sustained response to infliximab treatment for Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 14517.
  • 48
    Orlando A, Colombo E, Kohn A, et al. Infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease: predictors of response in an Italian multicentric open study. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37: 57783.
  • 49
    Baldassano R, Braegger CP, Escher JC, et al. Infliximab (REMICADE) therapy in the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 8338.
    Direct Link:
  • 50
    Lamireau T, Cezard JP, Dabadie A, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of infliximab in children and adolescents with Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004; 10: 74550.
  • 51
    de Ridder L, Escher JC, Bouquet J, et al. Infliximab therapy in 30 patients with refractory pediatric Crohn disease with and without fistulas in the Netherlands. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 39: 4652.
  • 52
    Kugathasan S. Prolonged duration of response to infliximab in early pediatric Crohn's disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 33: S4043.
  • 53
    Borrelli O, Bascietto C, Viola F, et al. Infliximab heals intestinal inflammatory lesions and restores growth in children with Crohn's disease. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36: 3427.
  • 54
    Topstad DR, Panaccione R, Heine JA, Johnson DR, MacLean AR, Buie WD. Combined seton placement, infliximab infusion, and maintenance immunosuppressives improve healing rate in fistulizing anorectal Crohn's disease: a single center experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 57783.
  • 55
    Sands BE, Tremaine WJ, Sandborn WJ, et al. Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2001; 7: 838.
  • 56
    Probert CS, Hearing SD, Schreiber S, et al. Infliximab in moderately severe glucocorticoid resistant ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2003; 52: 9981002.
  • 57
    Ochsenkuhn T, Sackmann M, Goke B. Infliximab for acute, not steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a randomized pilot study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 116771.
  • 58
    Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Olson A, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of infliximab therapy for active ulcerative colitis: Act I trial. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: A-105.
  • 59
    Sandborn WJ, Rachmilewitz D, Hanauer SB, et al. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: the Act 2 trial. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: A-104.
  • 60
    Jarnerot G, Hertervig E, Frijs-Liby I, et al. Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 180511.
  • 61
    Papadakis KA, Treyzon L, Abreu MT, Fleshner PR, Targan SR, Vasiliauskas EA. Infliximab in the treatment of medically refractory indeterminate colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 7417.
  • 62
    Brooklyn T, Shetty A, Bowden J, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: A-26.
  • 63
    Sheldon DG, Sawchuk LL, Kozarek RA, Thirlby RC. Twenty cases of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum: diagnostic implications and management. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 5648.
  • 64
    Lyons JL, Rosenbaum JT. Uveitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease compared with uveitis associated with spondyloarthropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 614.
  • 65
    Joseph A, Raj D, Dua HS, Powell PT, Lanyon PC, Powell RJ. Infliximab in the treatment of refractory posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 144953.
  • 66
    El-Shabrawi Y, Hermann J. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy with infliximab as an alternative to corticosteroids in the treatment of human leukocyte antigen B27-associated acute anterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 23426.
  • 67
    Van den Bosch F, Kruithof E, De Vos M, De Keyser F, Mielants H. Crohn's disease associated with spondyloarthropathy: effect of TNF-alpha blockade with infliximab on articular symptoms. Lancet 2000; 356: 18212.
  • 68
    Van Den Bosch F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 75565.
  • 69
    Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 118793.
  • 70
    Gorman JD, Sack KE, Davis Jr JC. Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 134956.
  • 71
    Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M, et al. Incidence and importane of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 54253.
  • 72
    Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 6018.
  • 73
    Farrell RJ, Alsahli M, Jeen YT, Falchuk KR, Peppercorn MA, Michetti P. Intravenous hydrocortisone premedication reduces antibodies to infliximab in Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 91724.
  • 74
    Noman M, Vermeire S, Van Assche G, et al. The effectiveness of immunosuppression to suppress the formation of antibodies to infliximab in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: A-5455.
  • 75
    Van Assche G, D'Haens G, Baert F, et al. The clinical outcome of maintenance therapy with infliximab for luminal Crohn's disease is not affected by concomitant immunosuppressives: results of a multicenter randomized infliximab maintenance/immunosuppressives discontinuation (imid) trial. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: A26.
  • 76
    Lemann M, Colombel J, Duclos B, et al. Infliximab in steroid dependent Crohn's disease patients treated with azathioprine or 6-MP a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut 2003; 52 (Suppl.): A44.
  • 77
    Hommes D, Baert F, Van Assche G, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the ideal medical management for Crohn's disease (CD): top-down versus step-up strategies. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: A577.
  • 78
    Rubenstein JH, Chong RY, Cohen RD. Infliximab decreases resource use among patients with Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 35: 1516.
  • 79
    Jewell DP, Probert C, Lobo A, et al. Infliximab use in Crohn's disease: impact on health care resources. Gut 2003; 52: A45. OP-G-223.
  • 80
    Wong JB, Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG. Estimating cost-effectiveness of maintenance infliximab for chronic active Crohn's disease from accent 1. Gut 2003; 52: A54. OP-G-269.
  • 81
    Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) Infliximab. 14 April 2005.
  • 82
    Colombel JF, Loftus Jr EV, Tremaine WJ, et al. The safety profile of infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease: the Mayo clinic experience in 500 patients. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1931.
  • 83
    Marchal L, D'Haens G, Van Assche G, et al. The risk of post-operative complications associated with infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease: a controlled cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19: 74954.
  • 84
    Colombel JF, Loftus Jr EV, Tremaine WJ, et al. Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn's disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 87883.
    Direct Link:
  • 85
    Vermeire S, Noman M, Van Assche G, et al. Autoimmunity associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment in Crohn's disease: a prospective cohort study. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 329.
  • 86
    Wolfe F, Michaud K. Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 174051.
  • 87
    Andus T, Stange EF, Hoffler D, Keller-Stanislawski B. Suspected cases of severe side effects after infliximab (Remicade) in Germany. Med Klin 2003; 98: 42936.
  • 88
    Ljung T, Karlen P, Schmidt D, et al. Infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical outcome in a population based cohort from Stockholm County. Gut 2004; 53: 84953.
  • 89
    Katz JA, Antoni C, Keenan GF, Smith DE, Jacobs SJ, Lichtenstein GR. Outcome of pregnancy in women receiving infliximab fort he treatment of Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 238592.
    Direct Link:
  • 90
    Mahadevan U, Kane S, Sandborn WJ, et al. Intentional infliximab use during pregnancy for induction or maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 7338.