• 1
    Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH, Reichelderfer M, Gopal DV, Pfau PR. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the first year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 2006; 241: 41725.
  • 2
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191200.
  • 3
    Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 17139.
  • 4
    Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365: 30511.
  • 5
    Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 63550.
  • 6
    Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237: 893904.
  • 7
    Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 88793.
    Direct Link:
  • 8
    Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, et al. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med 2002; 35: 199206.
  • 9
    Boyle P, Autier P, Bartelink H, et al. European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003). Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 9731005.
  • 10
    Seeff LC, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR. Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 7616.
  • 11
    Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 226874.
    Direct Link:
  • 12
    Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 55463.
  • 13
    Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, et al. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 38090.
    Direct Link:
  • 14
    Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 2007; 109: 221321.
  • 15
    Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 16619.
  • 16
    ‘The Need for Sustained Investment’. Age Profile Medical Devices, 3rd edn. Available at:, accessed on 5 June 2007.
  • 17
    Seeff LC, Tangka FK. Can we predict the outcomes of national colorectal cancer screening and can predictions help us plan? Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 133942.
  • 18
    Hassan C, Zullo A, Laghi A, et al. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 24250.
  • 19
    International Data Base. US Census Bureau. Available at:, accessed on 5 June 2007.
  • 20
    Life Tables for WHO Member States. Available at:, accessed on 5 June 2007.
  • 21
    Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoscopy”– SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 176372.
  • 22
    UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1291300.
  • 23
    Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 115162.
  • 24
    Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Fendrick AM. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 50715.
  • 25
    DiSario JA, Foutch PG, Mai HD, Pardy K, Manne RK. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 9415.
  • 26
    Vatn MH, Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study. Cancer 1982; 49: 81925.
  • 27
    Rickert RR, Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM. Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer 1979; 43: 184757.
  • 28
    Arminski TC, McLean MD. Incidence and distribution of adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum based on 1,000 autopsy examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 1964; 7: 24961.
  • 29
    Stemmermann GN, Heilbrun LK, Nomura A, Yano K, Hayashi T. Adenomatous polyps and atherosclerosis: an autopsy study of Japanese men in Hawaii. Int J Cancer 1986; 38: 78994.
  • 30
    Eide TJ. The age-, sex-, and site-specific occurrence of adenomas and carcinomas of the large intestine within a defined population. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 10838.
  • 31
    Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 96974.
  • 32
    Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer A, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 68592.
  • 33
    Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982; 23: 83542.
  • 34
    Clark JC, Collan Y, Eide TJ, et al. Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer. Int J Cancer 1985; 36: 17986.
  • 35
    Koretz RL. Malignant polyps: are they sheep in wolves’ clothing? Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 638.
  • 36
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 16974.
  • 37
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1628.
  • 38
    Sant M, Aareleid T, Berrino F, et al. EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94 – results and commentary. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: v61118.
  • 39
    Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB, et al. Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 10119.
  • 40
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 102533.
  • 41
    ACRIN Protocol 6664. Available at:, accessed on 11 October 2007.
  • 42
    Hur C, Gazelle GS, Zalis ME, Podolsky DK. An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 131221.
  • 43
    Rex DK, Lieberman D; ACG. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 14103.
    Direct Link:
  • 44
    Van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson CD, et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 97084.
  • 45
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 140312.
  • 46
    Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, et al. National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 6339.
  • 47
    Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S, Osnes M. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 44956.
  • 48
    Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH, Sauar J, Larsen S. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 85362.
  • 49
    Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 100913.
  • 50
    Welin S, Youker J, Spratt JS Jr. The rates and patterns of growth of 375 tumors of the large intestine and rectum observed serially by double contrast enema study (Malmö Technique). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1963; 90: 67387.
  • 51
    Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harras A, Edwards BK (eds) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1997 (NIH Publication No. 97-2789).