SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 1030.
  • 2
    Menees SB, Inadomi JM, Korsnes S, et al. Women patients’ preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 21923.
  • 3
    Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ III. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 318694.
    Direct Link:
  • 4
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, et al. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 91321.
  • 5
    Banerjee S, Van Dam J. CT colonography for colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 12133.
  • 6
    AGA Institute. Position of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on Computed Tomographic Colonography. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 16278.
  • 7
    AGA Institute. Will screening colonoscopy disappear and transform gastroenterology practice? Threats to clinical practice and recommendations to reduce their impact: report of a consensus conference conducted by the AGA Institute Future Trends Committee. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1287312.
  • 8
    Schoen RE, Corle D, Cranston L, et al. Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 53341.
  • 9
    Schoenfeld P, Shad J, Ormseth E, et al. Predictive value of Diminutive Colonic Adenoma Trial: The PREDICT Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 1: 195201.
  • 10
    Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 1999; 281: 16117.
  • 11
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Ching MS, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 6974.
  • 12
    Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Desmond R, et al. Female gender and other factors predictive of a limited screening flexible sigmoidoscopy examination for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 16349.
    Direct Link:
  • 13
    Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC. Anatomic extent of fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 8068.
  • 14
    Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Schmitt T, et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 5605.
  • 15
    Froelich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W, et al. Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 19.
  • 16
    Levin TR, Conell C, Shapiro JA, et al. Complications of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 178692.
  • 17
    Iqbal CW, Chum YS, Farley DR. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 122936.
  • 18
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191200.
  • 19
    Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 54460.
  • 20
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2005; 329: 197781.
  • 21
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 3529.
  • 22
    Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 248.
  • 23
    Rockey DC, Barish M, Brill JV, et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 100524.
  • 24
  • 25
    Rex DK, Chak A, Vasudeva R, et al. Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 72730.
  • 26
    Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Pinsky PL, et al. Yield of advanced adenoma and cancer based on polyp size detected at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 16839.
  • 27
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 197781.
  • 28
    Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: S1628.
  • 29
    Cooper GS. Colonoscopy: a tarnished gold standard? Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2588604.
  • 30
    Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, et al. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37: 1138.
  • 31
    Rathgaber SW, Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 55662.
  • 32
    Wells CD, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, et al. Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol 2007; 7: 19.
  • 33
    Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2297303.
  • 34
    Harewood GC. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50: 4751.
  • 35
    Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 34350.
    Direct Link:
  • 36
    Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 4526.
  • 37
    Chiu HM, Lin JT, Wang HP, et al. The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms – a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 271925.
    Direct Link:
  • 38
    Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 27116.
    Direct Link:
  • 39
    Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degree wide angle colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 213842.
    Direct Link:
  • 40
    Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 51922.
    Direct Link:
  • 41
    Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 96104.
  • 42
    Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, et al. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 94: 86877.
  • 43
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 140312.
  • 44
    Rex DK, Ransahoff DF, Achkar E. Debate: colonoscopy is justified for any polyp discovered during computed tomographic colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 19038.
    Direct Link:
  • 45
    Villavicencio RT, Rex DK. Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000; 11: 18593.
  • 46
    Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 44956.
  • 47
    Korina Bersentes K, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE. Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 92: 111720.
  • 48
    Mulhall BP, Veerapan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 63550.