SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 16707.
  • 2
    Sivak MV Jr, Fleischer DE. Colonoscopy with a Videoendoscope: preliminary experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1984; 30: 15.
  • 3
    Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 427.
  • 4
    Wolff WI, Shinya H. Colonofiberoscopy. JAMA 1971; 217: 150912.
  • 5
    East JE, Suzuki N, Stavrinidis M, et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 2008; 57: 6570.
  • 6
    Shenoy K, Friedenberg FK. Performance of high-definition colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB93.
  • 7
    Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 253341.
  • 8
    Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 85661.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 34350.
    Direct Link:
  • 10
    East JE, Saunders BP, Jass JR. Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history and clinical management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37: 2546.
  • 11
    Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 51922.
    Direct Link:
  • 12
    Jass JR, Whitehall VLJ, Young J, et al. Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 86276.
  • 13
    Triadafilopoulos G, Watts HD, Higgins J, et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 13944.
  • 14
    East JE, Saunders BP, Boone D, et al. Effect of antispasmodic on colonic surface area visualisation at ct simulated optical colonoscopy [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB268.
  • 15
    East JE, Saunders BP, Burling D, et al. Surface visualisation at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 252935.
    Direct Link:
  • 16
    East JE, Suzuki N, Arebi N, et al. Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 2639.
  • 17
    Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 20005.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 4447.
  • 19
    Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 3338.
  • 20
    Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Slater R, et al. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut 2004; 53: 37680.
  • 21
    Matsuda T, Saito Y, Ikehara H, et al. Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? A prospective study [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB346.
  • 22
    Thomas-Gibson S, Bassett P, Suzuki N, et al. Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 81824.
  • 23
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer and the american cancer society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 187285.
  • 24
    East JE, Bassett P, Stavrinidis M, et al. Patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomised, crossover trial. Gut 2008; 57(Suppl I): A4.
  • 25
    Rex D. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 336.
  • 26
    Hanson JM, Atkin WS, Cunliffe WJ, et al. Rectal retroflexion: an essential part of lower gastrointestinal endoscopic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 17068.
  • 27
    Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S343.
  • 28
    Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM, et al. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 82531.
  • 29
    Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, Ahsan H, et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 4028.
  • 30
    Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 96571.
  • 31
    Rijcken FEM, Hollema H, Kleibeuker JH. Proximal adenomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are prone to rapid malignant transformation. Gut 2002; 50: 3826.
  • 32
    Wallace MH, Frayling IM, Clark SK, et al. Attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli: the role of ascertainment bias through failure to dye-spray at colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 107880.
  • 33
    Chen CD, Yen MF, Wang WM, et al. A case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 186673.
  • 34
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 107785.
  • 35
    Spring KJ, Zhao ZZ, Karamatic R, et al. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 14007.
  • 36
    Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S, et al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 17005.
  • 37
    Chen SC, Mouchli A, Chadalawada V, et al. Histopathology of small polyps removed in the videoendoscopic era [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: AB199.
  • 38
    East JE, Suzuki N, Saunders BP. Comparision of magnified pit pattern interpretation with narrow band imaging versus chromoendoscopy for diminutive colonic polyps: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 3106.
  • 39
    Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 70613.
  • 40
    Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 814.
  • 41
    East JE, Saunders BP. Look, remove and discard: can narrow band imaging replace histopathology for small colorectal polyps – it’s time to push the button! Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 9536.
  • 42
    Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 286677.
    Direct Link: