• 1
    Brain AIJ. The Intavent Laryngeal Mask. Instruction Manual, 2nd edn. 1993.
  • 2
    Asai T, Morris S. The laryngeal mask airway: its features, effects and role. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1994; 41: 93060.
  • 3
    Barker P, Langton JA, Wilson IG, Smith G. Movements of the vocal cords on induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 69: 235.
  • 4
    McKeating K, Bali IM, Dundee JW. The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 63840.
  • 5
    Leslie K, Crankshaw DP. Potency of propofol for loss of consciousness after a single dose. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1990; 64: 7346.
  • 6
    Blake DW, Dawson P, Donnan G, Bjorksten A. Propofol induction for laryngeal mask airway insertion: dose requirement and cardiorespiratory effects. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1992; 20: 47983.
  • 7
    Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1993; 40: 8168.
  • 8
    Driver I, Wiltshire S, Mills P, Lillywhite N, Howard-Griffin R. Midazolam before induction improves conditions for laryngeal mask insertion. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 75: 664P.
  • 9
    Kinirons B, Hubbard K, Cunningham AJ. Laryngeal mask airway—optimum time for insertion? British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 75: 66454.
  • 10
    Brown GW, Patel N, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 7712.
  • 11
    Cummings GC, Dixon J, Kay NH, Winsor JPW, Major E, Morgan M, Sear JW, Spence AA, Stephenson DK. Dose requirements of ICI 35, 868 (propofol, ‘Diprivan’) in a new formation for induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 116871.
  • 12
    Naguib M, Sari-Kouzel A, Seraj M, El-Gammal M, Comma M. Induction dose-response studies with propofol and thiopentone. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 68: 30810.
  • 13
    Stoneham MD, Bree SE, Sneyd JR. Facilitation of the laryngeal mask insertion. Effects of lignocaine given intravenously before induction with propofol. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 4646.
  • 14
    Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Canadian Anaesthetist's Society Journal 1985; 32: 42934.
  • 15
    Samsoon GLT, Young JRB. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 48790.
  • 16
    Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R. Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 100543.
  • 17
    Stokes DN, Hutton P. Rate-dependent induction phenomena with propofol: implications for the relative potency of intravenous anaesthetics. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1991; 72: 57883.
  • 18
    Wilson IG, Fell D, Robinson SL, Smith G. Cardiovascular response to insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 3002.
  • 19
    Myint Y, Singh AK, Peacock JE, Padfield A. Changes in intra-ocular pressure during general anaesthesia. A comparison of spontaneous breathing through a larnygeal mask with positive pressure ventilation through a tracheal tube. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 1269.
  • 20
    Miller DK, Homan SM. Graphical aid for determining power of clinical trials involving two groups. British Medical Journal 1988; 297: 6726.
  • 21
    Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London : Chapman & Hall, 1991.