Identifying the thoracic epidural space

Authors


  • A response to a previously published article or letter can be submitted to the Online Correspondence section at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com. A selection of this correspondence is published several times a year in Anaesthesia. All correspondence intended for publication in Anaesthesia should be addressed to Dr David Bogod, Editor-in-Chief, and submitted as an e-mail attachment to anaesthesia@nottingham.ac.uk. For multi-author letters, a covering letter signed by all authors must be submitted either by post, fax (44 (0) 115 962 7670) or by e-mail as a scanned document before correspondence can be published. Alternatively, letters may be submitted typewritten on one side of paper, double spaced with wide margins to Anaesthesia, 1st Floor, Maternity Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. All paper submissions must include a signed covering letter, a disc or CD-ROM with a Word for Windows or .rtf version of the letter and an email address for the corresponding author. Copy should be prepared in the usual style of the Correspondence section. Authors must follow the advice about references and other matters contained in the Author Guidelines at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/ana/submiss.htm. Correspondence presented in any other style or format will be returned to the author for revision.

Drs Patrick and Miller [1] advocate the use of the hanging drop technique to identify the epidural space in the thoracic region. However, they do not specify whether the patient is awake or anaesthetised. The same issue of Anaesthesia contains two papers that both show that 15% of anaesthetists site epidurals in anaesthetised patients [2, 3].

I am fearful that some of the latter group will be tempted to try out a technique which relies upon negative pressure in the epidural space, and which does not work in patients undergoing intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Perhaps a note of caution should be published to prevent avoidable damage to patients through an increased risk of dural puncture?