A response to a previously published article or letter can be submitted to the Online Correspondence section at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com. A selection of this correspondence is published several times a year in Anaesthesia. All correspondence intended for publication in Anaesthesia should be addressed to Dr David Bogod, Editor-in-Chief, and submitted as an e-mail attachment to email@example.com. For multi-author letters, a covering letter signed by all authors must be submitted either by post, fax (44 (0) 115 962 7670) or by e-mail as a scanned document before correspondence can be published. Alternatively, letters may be submitted typewritten on one side of paper, double spaced with wide margins to Anaesthesia, 1st Floor, Maternity Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. All paper submissions must include a signed covering letter, a disc or CD-ROM with a Word for Windows or .rtf version of the letter and an email address for the corresponding author. Copy should be prepared in the usual style of the Correspondence section. Authors must follow the advice about references and other matters contained in the Author Guidelines at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/ana/submiss.htm. Correspondence presented in any other style or format will be returned to the author for revision.
Article first published online: 6 JUL 2006
Volume 61, Issue 8, page 813, August 2006
How to Cite
Patrick, A. (2006), A reply. Anaesthesia, 61: 813. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04728_2.x
- Issue published online: 6 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 6 JUL 2006
I appreciate Dr Burt's interest in the use of the hanging drop technique to identify the epidural space in the thoracic region. While there is a presumption of negative pressure in the thoracic epidural space as a reflection of interpleural pressure, I am not aware of any study which confirms this, nor the effect of spontaneous vs controlled ventilation and explanation of the mechanism of the hanging drop or any other so-called negative pressure technique used to locate the epidural space remains speculative.
I use a lateral approach for insertion of a mid-thoracic epidural, which requires generous infiltration with lidocaine 1% to allow the lamina to be explored with the epidural needle prior to coming off bone into the ligamentum flavum. This allows the lamina to be probed without discomfort to the patient and although the initial injection may be painful very briefly, it is certainly less extensive than the infiltration required for many plastic surgery procedures performed under local anaesthesia. General anaesthesia is certainly not required.
My own practice is to site thoracic epidurals, following explanation, appropriate premedication and (especially) adequate local anaesthesia, in patients who are awake. Apart from potential safety issues in anaesthetised patients, concerns about modification of technique to take account of putative alterations in pressure in the epidural space then become academic.