A response to a previously published article or letter can be submitted to the Online Correspondence section at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com. Please note that a selection of this correspondence will be reproduced (possibly in modified form) in the journal. All correspondence intended for publication in Anaesthesia should be addressed to Dr Steve Yentis, Editor-in-Chief, and submitted as an email attachment to firstname.lastname@example.org. Copy should be prepared in the usual style of the Correspondence section. Authors must follow the advice about references and other matters contained in the Guidance for Authors at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/anae. Correspondence presented in any other style or format will be returned to the author for revision. All correspondence submissions should be accompanied by a completed Author Declaration Form which can be accessed via a link under ‘Covering letter’ in the Guidance for Authors (as above). The completed Author Declaration Form should be sent either by e-mail with the submission or by fax to (0)207 681 1008.
Non-Luer neuraxial equipment and anaesthetists’ attitudes to change
Article first published online: 16 DEC 2010
Anaesthesia © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
Volume 66, Issue 1, pages 59–60, January 2011
How to Cite
Howes, B., Kinsella, S. M. and Youngs, P. (2011), Non-Luer neuraxial equipment and anaesthetists’ attitudes to change. Anaesthesia, 66: 59–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06572.x
Visit the Anaesthesia Correspondence website at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com and comment on any article or letter in this issue of the Journal.
- Issue published online: 16 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 16 DEC 2010
We read with interest the article and editorial concerning the testing and development of spinal and epidural needles with non-Luer connectors [1, 2]. The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) patient safety alert produced in 2009 requires neuraxial equipment connections to be incompatible with standard Luer connectors . As there is no national agreed standard for the non-Luer connector, new purchasing pressures may develop within hospital trusts to standardise neuraxial equipment to one of a few suppliers.
We recently surveyed consultant anaesthetists in the 11 trusts with a consultant-led maternity unit in the South West region regarding their attitudes to standardising equipment within and between trusts. Two anaesthetists were contacted in each trust: the lead consultant for obstetric anaesthesia and the lead for non-obstetric regional anaesthesia. The survey was answered either online or by email.
We received 22 responses from the 11 hospital trusts, representing a 100% response rate. All trusts use Portex epidural needles (Smith Medical International Ltd, Ashford, Kent, UK). Spinal needles were supplied by the following manufacturers (number of responses): Vygon (11) (Vygon UK Ltd, Cirencester, Gloucester, UK), Polymedic (4) (Blue Box Medical Ltd, Southampton, UK), Becton Dickinson (5) (Becton Dickinson UK Ltd, Oxford, Oxfordshire), Pajunk (1) (Pajunk medical Products Ltd, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK) and Portex (1). Three trusts use different spinal needles for obstetric and non-obstetric anaesthesia.
The NPSA has advised that trusts convene a multiprofessional implementation group to manage and introduce the changes required by the 2009 safety alert. Five of our trusts surveyed reported having a group with anaesthetic representation, four trusts did not have a group and respondents from two trusts did not know whether they had a group. The opinions of the surveyed anaesthetists are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
|Not important||Important||Very important|
|How important is it to have the same connector design (i.e. same manufacturer) for your spinal and epidural equipment?||5||11||6|
|How important is it to have standardised neuraxial equipment (same manufacturer) across the Trust and various specialties (including medicine, paediatrics etc.)?||2||8||12|
|Disagree strongly||Disagree slightly||Neither agree or disagree||Slightly agree||Strongly agree|
|Standardising the manufacturer/connector of new neuraxial block equipment across the postgraduate school could improve patient safety||0||0||5||10||7|
|Standardising the manufacturer/connector of new neuraxial block equipment across the postgraduate school could make it simpler for trainees to provide anaesthesia||0||1||4||9||8|
|I would be willing to give up my first choice of manufacturer/connector in order to standardise neuraxial equipment across the postgraduate school||2||1||2||11||6|
There has been concern that the deadline for implementation of new spinal needles with non-Luer connections of 1st April 2011 is not achievable . The NPSA have advised that in this situation, affected equipment should be placed on the trust risk register . This implementation will be complex and require co-ordinated management. Our survey shows a clear majority of opinion, among consultant anaesthetists surveyed in the South West region, that standardisation of equipment is desirable for improving patient safety and benefitting trainees’ practice. This opinion applies both to a standard for epidural and spinal equipment and more strongly for all spinal equipment used by different physicians throughout each trust. There was also willingness to compromise on first choice of equipment in favour of standardising across the postgraduate training area.
No external funding and no competing interests declared. Previously posted at the Anaesthesia Correspondence website: http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com.
- 3National Patient Safety Agency. Safer Spinal (Intrathecal), Epidural and Regional Devices. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/type/alerts/?entryid45=65259&q=0%C2%ACsafer+spinal%C2%AC (accessed 01/10/2010).
- 4Royal College of Anaesthetists. Statement by Dr Peter Nightingale, President of the RCoA on NPSA’s Safer Neuraxial Connectors Alert. http://rcoa.ac.uk/index.asp?PageID=64&NewsID=787 (accessed 01/10/2010).
- 5Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. NPSA Safer Spinal Needles. http://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/content.asp?contentid=367 (accessed 01/10/2010).