A response to a previously published article or letter can be submitted to the Online Correspondence section at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com. Please note that a selection of this correspondence will be reproduced (possibly in modified form) in the journal. All correspondence intended for publication in Anaesthesia should be addressed to Dr Steve Yentis, Editor-in-Chief, and submitted as an email attachment to firstname.lastname@example.org. Copy should be prepared in the usual style of the Correspondence section. Authors must follow the advice about references and other matters contained in the Guidance for Authors at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/anae. Correspondence presented in any other style or format will be returned to the author for revision. All correspondence submissions should be accompanied by a completed Author Declaration Form which can be accessed via a link under ‘Covering letter’ in the Guidance for Authors (as above). The completed Author Declaration Form should be sent either by e-mail with the submission or by fax to (0)207 681 1008.
Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery – some observations
Article first published online: 16 DEC 2010
Anaesthesia © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
Volume 66, Issue 1, pages 62–63, January 2011
How to Cite
Cornish, P. (2011), Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery – some observations. Anaesthesia, 66: 62–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06575.x
Visit the Anaesthesia Correspondence website at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com and comment on any article or letter in this issue of the Journal.
- Issue published online: 16 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 16 DEC 2010
In their review of postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery, Fredrickson et al. have focused on continuous interscalene techniques as the desired standard . I have previously questioned the evidence surrounding this supposition . Shoulder surgery is not always associated with severe pain and I would suggest that a perineural catheter infusion is not always required. Case selection has always been part of the art.
I am concerned that the authors suggested that alignment of the needle during interscalene block makes needle trauma almost impossible. The needle in any type of interscalene block is neither aligned with the nerve roots nor with the brachial plexus (Fig. 4) . Fredrickson et al. did not demonstrate a difference in needle trauma rates from other published series  and I think that this contradicts their review. Alignment of the needle may lessen trauma to the nerve, but there is no published objective evidence for that hypothesis.
Early reports regarding perineural infusions suggested lack of efficacy , and anecdotally leakage at catheter skin entry site was a problem. The subsequent success of boluses combined with low infusion rates may be due to the dynamics of spread along tissue planes to create a successful block, combined with less leakage dislodging the dressing and the catheter.
Refilling of elastomeric infusion devices is against manufacturers’ recommendations. Given that flow rate from these devices is not linear at the beginning or end of the infusion, I would suggest that it is unwise to risk inaccurate device performance characteristics on a second or even a third refilling.
The authors suggested that the axillary/suprascapular block combination is the preferred option for the respiratory cripple, given that the phrenic nerve is avoided, but this is a single-shot technique that may initially provide adequate analgesia for a situation with potentially significant ongoing analgesic requirements beyond the duration of the block. They may also have mentioned the small risk of pneumothorax from suprascapular nerve block.
The authors also noted a significant incidence of breathlessness (likely to reflect phrenic paresis) in healthy patients using continuous interscalene block. I wonder if the authors have any comment regarding the problem of breathlessness during continuous interscalene block.
No external funding and no competing interest declared. Previously posted at the Anaesthesia Correspondence website: http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com.
- 3An analysis of the spatial relationships of the brachial plexus using magnetic resonance imaging. International Monitor of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy 2002; 14: 116., , .