Negligence litigation and medicine: force for good or root of all evil?
Article first published online: 14 MAR 2011
© 2011 The Author. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
Volume 66, Issue 4, pages 247–249, April 2011
How to Cite
Bogod, D. (2011), Negligence litigation and medicine: force for good or root of all evil?. Anaesthesia, 66: 247–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06688.x
- Issue published online: 14 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 14 MAR 2011
- 4Hepworth v Kerr  6 Med LR.
- 5Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee  1 WLR 583.
- 6Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority  4 All ER 771.
- 7Roe v Ministry of Health and Others. Wooley v Same  2 All Eng LR 131-43.
- 9Allegation of irritant in anaesthetic: damages claimed. The Times 1953; 21: 12.
- 12LewisG (ed). The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer – 2003-2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.
- 13Royal College of Anaesthetists. NAP3. The Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. London: RCoA, 2009.
- 14NHSLA. The National Health Service Litigation Authority: Reports and Accounts 2010. London: The Stationery Office, 2010.
- 15External Inquiry into the Adverse Incident that Occurred at Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, 4th January 2001. London: Department of Health, 2001..