Presented in part at the Intensive Care Society Winter Meeting, London 2009, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress, Miami, January 2010
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Recombinant activated protein C usage in Scotland: a comparison with published guidelines and a survey of attitudes†
Article first published online: 19 OCT 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06925.x
Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
Additional Information
How to Cite
Puxty, A., McConnell, P., Crawley, S., McAree, S., Quasim, T. and Ramsay, S. (2012), Recombinant activated protein C usage in Scotland: a comparison with published guidelines and a survey of attitudes. Anaesthesia, 67: 43–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06925.x
- †
You can respond to this article at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 19 OCT 2011
- Accepted: 31 August 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Summary
Severe sepsis is a common cause of admission to the intensive care unit and is associated with a high hospital mortality. This audit explored the current use of, and attitudes towards, recombinant activated protein C therapy across Scotland, and compared these with current guidance. Patients with severe sepsis were followed for three days. Consideration and/or usage of recombinant activated protein C were compared with two different guidelines. Ninety-seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over the audit period. Recombinant activated protein C was used in nine of these patients. Depending on the criteria used, between 50% and 81% of the patients who qualified for recombinant activated protein C therapy did not receive it. Subsequent to the audit, a survey was performed to study intensive care unit consultants’ attitudes to recombinant activated protein C therapy. A total of 125 consultants responded to the survey (77%). Of these, 104 (83%) stated that they used recombinant activated protein C in their clinical practice, 56 (52%) of whom prescribed it to patients with two-organ failures and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of ≥ 25. Thirty-nine respondents (38%) stated that two-organ failures alone would be an adequate trigger for therapy. We conclude that recombinant activated protein C is potentially under-used to treat severe sepsis. Many consultants seem to reserve the drug for the most severely ill sub group of patients.

1365-2044/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=bd83df57543a1d11ffc15f630bb1301f0be80859)
1365-2044/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=682381a959ba60d2021adaffc90d459e71bfcaba)
