These authors contributed equally to this work.
Original Article
Morphometric analysis of four different populations of Penaeus monodon (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae)
Article first published online: 10 JUL 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03210.x
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

Aquaculture Research
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sun, M. M., Huang, J. H., Jiang, S. G., Yang, Q. B., Zhou, F. L., Zhu, C. Y., Yang, L. S. and Su, T. F. (2012), Morphometric analysis of four different populations of Penaeus monodon (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). Aquaculture Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03210.x
- †
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Publication History
- Article first published online: 10 JUL 2012
Funded by
- Agricultural Science and Technology. Grant Number: 2009GB23260460
- National Shrimp Industry Technology System of China. Grant Number: nycytx-46
- Science and Technology Project of Guangdong. Grant Number: 2009B020308002
- Marine Fisheries Popularize Special of Guangdong. Grant Number: A201001B01
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Penaeus monodon;
- morphometric variation;
- multivariated analysis;
- distinct populations;
- Indian Ocean;
- Western Pacific Ocean
Abstract
The morphological variation of Penaeus monodon was studied based on the morphometric analyses of samples collected throughout Banda Aceh, Khanom, Mozambique and Sanya. A total of 470 samples were investigated using eight measurements. Multivariate analyses [principal components (PCA), discriminant function (DFA) and cluster analyses (CA)] revealed obvious morphometric differences among the four geographical populations. PCA indicated that the first three components of the females and the first two components of the males accounted for 75.17% and 71.84% of the total morphological variability respectively. In DFA, the overall assignment of female and male individuals into their original population was 78.95% and 84.37% respectively. For females, the proportion of individuals correctly classified into their original population was 76.0%, 92.8%, 92.6% and 54.5% for population 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. For males, the proportion was 97.2%, 68.1%, 100% and 72.2% respectively. For females and males, CA showed that the four populations could be divided into two main clusters of morphological characteristics. CA also indicated that the morphological variation of population 3 was greater, whereas the morphology of population 2 was strikingly similar to that of population 4.

1365-2109/asset/are_left.gif?v=1&s=53ba7b173959bbf90d27c75d350084bf78bff5d6)
1365-2109/asset/are_centre.gif?v=1&s=d6057b02814be5fa67576bf948460f45b89bf010)
1365-2109/asset/are_right.gif?v=1&s=a454e074237c750d725757bc55c75bed242ea6fb)