Original Article
Dietary arginine requirement of juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum)
Article first published online: 11 JUL 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03218.x
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

Aquaculture Research
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ren, M., Ai, Q. and Mai, K. (2012), Dietary arginine requirement of juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Aquaculture Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03218.x
Publication History
- Article first published online: 11 JUL 2012
Funded by
- National Key Technology R&D Program. Grant Number: 2006BAD03B03
- National Department Public Benefit Research Foundation. Grant Number: 201003020
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cobia;
- arginine;
- requirement;
- feeding and nutrition
Abstract
A 9-week feeding trial was conducted to estimate the dietary requirement of arginine in juvenile cobia in indoor flow-through and aerated aquaria. Six isonitrogenous and isoenergetic practical diets were formulated to contain graded levels of arginine ranging from 1.76% to 3.75% (dry weight) at about 0.4% increments replaced by equal proportions of glycine. Survival was not significantly different among dietary treatments. Specific growth rate (SGR) and feed efficiency ratio (FER) increased with increasing dietary arginine up to the 2.96% diet (P < 0.05), and thereafter declined. The whole body crude protein content was significantly affected by dietary arginine (P < 0.05), while moisture, crude lipid and ash showed no significant differences among dietary treatments. The essential amino acid contents of muscle were not significantly affected by dietary arginine. The serum nitric oxide synthase activities in fish fed diets with arginine from 2.18% to 3.75% were significantly higher than activities in fish fed the diet with 1.76% arginine (P < 0.05). On the basis of SGR and FER, the optimal dietary arginine requirements of juvenile cobia were estimated to be 2.85% of the diet (6.20% of dietary protein) and 2.82% of the diet (6.13% of dietary protein), respectively, using second-order polynomial regression analysis.

1365-2109/asset/are_left.gif?v=1&s=53ba7b173959bbf90d27c75d350084bf78bff5d6)
1365-2109/asset/are_centre.gif?v=1&s=d6057b02814be5fa67576bf948460f45b89bf010)
1365-2109/asset/are_right.gif?v=1&s=a454e074237c750d725757bc55c75bed242ea6fb)