• glucagon-like peptide-1;
  • gut hormones;
  • obesity;
  • oxyntomodulin;
  • pancreatic polypeptide;
  • peptide YY


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

Obesity is a major worldwide health problem. The treatment options are severely limited. The development of novel anti-obesity drugs is fraught with efficacy and safety issues. Consequently, several investigational anti-obesity drugs have failed to gain marketing approval in recent years. Anorectic gut hormones offer a potentially safe and viable option for the treatment of obesity. The prospective utility of gut hormones has improved drastically in recent years with the development of longer acting analogues. Additionally, specific combinations of gut hormones have been demonstrated to have additive anorectic effects. This article reviews the current stage of anti-obesity drugs in development, focusing on gut hormone-based therapies.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

Obesity is a leading cause of preventable mortality worldwide. Current strategies for obesity management include lifestyle changes, pharmacological intervention and bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgical procedures most successfully achieve sustained weight loss. However, due to the expensive and highly invasive nature of these procedures, they are generally only available to the morbidly obese. In England, approximately 2% of the population is morbidly obese (BMI > 40 kg m−2) but a further 60% is considered to be overweight or obese (BMI 25–40 kg m−2) [1]. For the majority of the overweight population the only options are therefore pharmacological and/or lifestyle interventions. However, long term compliance with such interventions is low and the efficacy of currently available drugs is limited, leading to relatively low successful treatment rates [2].

Pharmacotherapy for obesity is limited by efficacy and safety issues. Orlistat, a gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor, is the only prescription medicine for obesity currently licensed in the UK. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) currently recommend that for a new anti-obesity drug to be approved it should result in a statistically significant placebo adjusted weight loss of greater than 5% at the end of a 12 month period. Less than 30% of patients on Orlistat achieve this magnitude of weight loss [3]. More effective pharmacotherapy is therefore urgently needed. Analysis of certain drugs in development have demonstrated improved efficacy. The SEQUEL study of Qnexa® (a combination of the anticonvulsant topiramate, a weak carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and the appetite suppressant phentermine, an amphetamine derivative) reports 79% of treated patients achieving >5% weight loss [4]. However, the development of novel drug treatments is also burdened with safety concerns. A number of investigational drugs that are in late phase clinical trials, including Qnexa®, and also Contrave® and lorcaserin, have recently failed to gain marketing approval because of such concerns [5–7]. The ability to predict efficacy and potential side effects and the frequency with which such side effects occur are consequently major hurdles to the development of novel anti-obesity drugs.

Animal models have proven useful in the study of obesity and the identification of novel anti-obesity drug targets. Drug-induced weight loss in such models commonly reflects effects in humans. However, their ability to predict potential side effects remains in question. Some of the most common side effects associated with previous and putative anti-obesity drugs are nausea, cardiovascular events and psychological sequelae [8]. Unlike humans, rodents lack an emetic response. Consequently, strategies such as behavioural studies, measuring pica, conditioned taste aversion or conditioned gaping have to be used to evaluate potential drug induced nausea in pre-clinical studies in rodents [8, 9]. However, it is unclear how predictive the results of these tests are of the effects in humans. To help predict potential cardiovascular side effects in the clinic, the application of radio-telemetry technology to assess comprehensively changes in cardiovascular parameters, such as blood pressure, heart rate and electrical activity, during pre-clinical drug assessment can be utilized. Psychological side effects are possibly the most difficult to evaluate pre-clinically, although tests such as the forced swim test can be employed to help evaluate potential depression-like side effects (similar to those that resulted in the recent market withdrawal of rimonabant) [10]. In addition, both cardiovascular and psychological side effects tend to develop after chronic treatment and can therefore be difficult to identify during pre-clinical testing.

The history of the obesity drug market suggests that greater emphasis on investigating potential side effects is required in the early pre-clinical stages of drug development. Recent research has identified a number of potentially safer targets. This article focuses on anti-obesity drugs currently in development and, in particular, the potential utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity agents.

Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

The extent of the obesity problem and the lack of licensed pharmacotherapies have created a large potential market for the development of new treatment options. Consequently, there are currently a number of drugs for obesity in late stage development (summarized in Table 1). However approval for some of these agents has been delayed due to safety concerns.

Table 1. Anti-obesity drugs in late phase development
Drug Target Status
Qnexa® (topiramate and phentermine) Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, Sympathomimetic agentFDA complete response letter received. Concerns over elevated heart rate and teratogenic potential. NDA submitted in October 2011 seeking approval for reduced market population.
Contrave® (bupropion and naltrexone) Dopamine and norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitor, µ-opioid antagonistFDA complete response letter received. Concerns over long term cardiovascular risk. Further trials in the pipeline
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc
Lorcaserin 5-HT2C receptor agonistFDA complete response letter received. Concerns over efficacy and safety: carcinogenicity and valvulopathy. Further trials on going
Arena Pharmaceuticals
Liraglutide GLP-1 analoguePhase III clinical trials
Novo Nordisk
Cetilistat Pancreatic lipase inhibitorPhase III clinical trials
Norgine B.V.
Empatic® (zonisamide and bupropion) Anti-epileptic, dopamine and norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitorPhase II clinical trials
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc.
Pramlinitide/Metreleptin Amylin analogue and leptin analoguePhase II clinical trials
Amylin Pharmaceuticals
Velneperit NPY5R antagonistPhase II clinical trials
Shionogi & Co. Ltd
Tesofensine Triple monoamine re-uptake inhibitor: serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrinePhase II clinical trials
NeuroSearch A/S
Obinepitide PP and PYY3–36 analoguesPhase II clinical trials
7TM Pharma


Qnexa® is an investigational, once daily, oral, controlled release combination therapy. It consists of topiramate, a drug originally approved for migraine prophylaxis and used as an anti-convulsant which demonstrated unexpected weight loss as a side effect [11], and phentermine, an amphetamine derivative which has been available in the US for more than 30 years as a short term treatment for obesity. Developed by Vivus Inc, Qnexa® has undergone multiple phase III trials demonstrating weight loss that meets the criteria set forth by the FDA for a novel anti-obesity drug [4]. The FDA stated associations with an elevated heart rate and potential teratogenic effects [5], as reasoning for non-approval of a New Drug Application (NDA) for Qnexa® submitted in December 2009. In October 2011, Vivus submitted a NDA for Qnexa® to the FDA seeking approval for an initial indication for the treatment of obesity, with a contraindication for women of childbearing potential [12]. The FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee have since recommended Qnexa® be granted marketing approval by the FDA for the treatment of obesity in adults [13].


Contrave® is a controlled release combination therapy of bupropion, an inhibitor of dopamine and norepinephrine re-uptake, and naltrexone, a µ-opioid antagonist. Developed by Orexigen Therapeutics Inc, Contrave® has completed a number of phase III trials successfully demonstrating appropriate efficacy [14]. However its approval has been prevented by cardiovascular safety concerns [6]. In September 2011, Orexigen announced that following a meeting with FDA's Office of New Drugs, a suitable cardiovascular outcomes trial that would address these concerns is feasible and likely forthcoming [15]. A Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) for the Contrave® outcomes trial was agreed with the FDA in January 2012. Initiation of this outcomes trial is imminent [16].


Lorcaserin is a selective 5-HT2C receptor agonist developed by Arena Pharmaceuticals. In September 2010, an FDA advisory panel voted to recommend against granting approval to market the drug based on concerns regarding both efficacy and safety [7]. In phase III trials lorcaserin demonstrated only a 3.1% placebo adjusted weight loss. There are also concerns regarding unexplained pre-clinical carcinogenicity signals and rates of valvulopathy in rats. The carcinogenicity of lorcaserin has since been reviewed by Arena and an increased incidence of malignant tumours was only associated with doses greater than those demonstrated to reduce significantly food intake [17, 18]. Phase III trials are continuing. Another 5-HT2C receptor agonist is also being developed by Proximagen Group plc for the treatment of obesity and is currently in phase II trials.

It seems likely that Qnexa®, Contrave® and lorcaserin will eventually be approved, and thus that more efficacious drugs are on the horizon. However, the development of safe drugs remains the biggest hurdle in the anti-obesity drug market.

The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

Anorectic gut hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY) and oxyntomodulin (OXM) are released from intestinal L-cells in response to the ingestion of nutrients and act on central appetite centres to control eating [19]. In states of obesity, endogenous production of gut hormones is insufficient to maintain energy homeostasis and thus a suitable intervention is required. It is widely acknowledged that obese patients do not respond successfully to exogenous leptin therapy, and that this is likely due to a saturable transport mechanism that is already at capacity in many obese individuals [20–22]. However, the obese do maintain their sensitivity to anorectic gut hormones [23–26]. Unlike many past and present treatment strategies, gut hormones are an important component of the physiological systems regulating appetite and lack severe adverse side effects, thus making them an attractive target for the treatment of obesity.

Glucagon-like peptide-1

GLP-1 is a 30 amino acid peptide produced by post translational enzymatic cleavage of the pre-proglucagon gene product, and is released from enteroendocrine L-cells in response to nutrient ingestion. Its biological activities include the stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion and the inhibition of glucagon secretion, gastric emptying and food intake [27]. GLP-17–36 is the major circulating bioactive form of GLP-1. GLP-1 treatment robustly reduces acute food intake in animals and man [28–30]. However, like other pre-proglucagon gene products, GLP-1 has a short half-life in vivo due to enzymatic degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) [31, 32]. Exogenous GLP-1 dosing is therefore not an ideal pharmacotherapy.

The incretin effects of GLP-1 have formed the basis of a number of anti-diabetic drugs. Two long acting GLP-1 analogues, exenatide and liraglutide, are widely used for the treatment of type II diabetes. In clinical trials both induced similar weight loss. However liraglutide appears to be better tolerated by patients and thus may be a more viable treatment option for weight management [33]. Liraglutide, developed by Novo Nordisk, is an acylated analogue of human GLP-1, with a considerably extended half-life in vivo. It was approved for clinical use in Europe in 2009 and in the USA in 2010 as a treatment for type II diabetes. Liraglutide is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials as an anti-obesity therapy [34].

However, safety concerns have arisen from post marketing surveillance of GLP-1 analogues which may impede their development as anti-obesity therapies. These include an apparent increased incidence of acute pancreatitis in patients treated with exenatide or liraglutide compared with other treatment strategies for type II diabetes [35, 36]. In contrast, rodent models provide no evidence of such an effect [37, 38]. Furthermore, rodent studies have suggested that liraglutide causes dose-dependent and treatment duration-dependent thyroid C-cell hyperplasia and tumours [39]. However, 2 year treatment with liraglutide in humans has not resulted in any increase in clinical signs of C-cell hyperplasia or tumours, as assessed by circulating concentrations of calcitonin [40]. These studies suggest potential inter-species differences, an obvious limitation of the use of animal models in the development of pharmacotherapies for human obesity. An additional concern is the development of treatment specific antibodies. Suitability for lifetime use is an advantageous property of any anti-obesity drug. Should treatment induce an immune response, this would limit the drug's long term efficacy and safety profile. Liraglutide is associated with a reduced frequency and lower levels of treatment-associated antibodies compared with exenatide [41], which is predicted to make it a safer and more efficacious option for development as an anti-obesity drug.


Oxyntomodulin (OXM), a 37-amino acid peptide secreted from L-cells, is another pre-proglucagon product demonstrated to reduce food intake in animal models and in humans [24, 42–46]. In comparison with other exogenously administered gut hormone peptides, OXM is thought to have a lower incidence of treatment-associated nausea [45, 47]. No OXM specific receptor has been identified to date. OXM has weak affinity for the glucagon receptor (GCGR) and also binds to the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), though at a much lower affinity than GLP-1. In mice, the anorectic effect of OXM is blocked by the GLP-1R antagonist exendin9–39 and is absent in GLP-1R knockout models but not in GCGR knockout models. The anorectic effects of OXM are thus thought to be mediated primarily through GLP-1R [44]. Despite its relatively weak affinity for GLP-1R, OXM has a more potent anorectic effect in acute food intake studies compared with GLP-1 at similar doses [48] and is thus a strong target for obesity therapeutics.

Oxyntomodulin has a short circulating half-life due to breakdown by DPP-IV and/or neutral endopeptidases (NEP), thus limiting the utility of the exogenous molecule as an anti-obesity agent. The in vivo bioactivity of OXM is increased by inhibitors of DPP-IV [49]. Furthermore, NH2-terminal modification of proglucagon-derived peptides, such as OXM and GLP-1, can reduce their susceptibility to enzymatic degradation by DPP-IV and extend their efficacy in vivo[49–51]. OXM bioactivity can also be prolonged by the substitution of short amino acid sequences in the midsection and octapeptide junction regions that reduce its susceptibility to NEP degradation. Moreover, acylation of the OXM C-terminal may improve bioactivity by increasing peptide binding to albumin, thereby impairing degradation and clearance [49]. It has been suggested that OXM stimulates energy expenditure via the glucagon receptor [46]. A study in diet-induced obese mice comparing the effects of a long-acting protease resistant dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonist and a selective GLP-1R agonist, with matched potency and pharmacokinetics, demonstrated that the dual agonist was the more effective anti-obesity agent [52]. Utilizing the mechanisms by which OXM exerts its effects on appetite and energy expenditure may thus be a promising approach for the development of novel anti-obesity drugs. Additionally, a long acting OXM analogue, OAP-189 (formally TKS1225), is currently in phase I clinical trials with Pfizer as a treatment for obesity [53].

Peptide tyrosine tyrosine

Peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY), a member of the PP-fold family of peptides, is secreted from intestinal L-cells in response to food ingestion. Two major forms are found in the circulation, PYY1–36 and a truncated form, PYY3–36[54], produced by enzymatic cleavage of PYY1–36 by DPP-IV [55]. PYY1–36 has agonist activity at Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptors, whereas PYY3–36 is a selective Y2 receptor agonist. There is little evidence to suggest PYY1–36 has a role in energy intake [56] but PYY3–36 is widely accepted as an anorexigenic hormone that can reduce food intake in lean and obese animals and in humans [23, 57–62].

The utility of exogenous PYY3–36 as a treatment for obesity is limited by its rapid metabolism [63]. Furthermore, the supraphysiological doses likely required for periodic administration of PYY3–36 to reduce food intake are associated with nausea [64]. As with GLP-1 and OXM, long-acting PYY3–36 analogues may be more useful than the endogenous molecule. The mechanisms by which PYY3–36 is rapidly degraded are not fully characterized. However, endopeptidases have been implicated in the degradation of PYY1–36[65], and thus similar mechanisms may be involved in the degradation of PYY3–36. It is likely that metalloendopeptidases such as meprin β are involved in the degradation of PYY3–36. Meprin β is proposed to cleave PYY3–36 at the conserved sites, Glu10-Asp11, Asp11-Ala12 and Ala12-Ser13. Co-administration of PYY3–36 and actinonin, an inhibitor of meprin β, to mice prolongs its anorectic effects [66]. Alternative strategies to prolong the anorectic actions of PYY3–36 have been investigated, including the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated conjugates and reversible PEGylation [67–69]. The latter method involved coupling PYY3–36 to a 40 kDa PEG group via a spontaneously cleavable linker which was gradually hydrolyzed, releasing unmodified PYY3–36 into the circulation. This type of modification avoids the need for repeat administrations or supraphysiological dosing and has been shown to induce a similar reduction in food intake in mice to that seen when PYY3–36 is continuously infused [69].

Pancreatic polypeptide

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), another member of the PP-fold family of peptides, is secreted postprandially from pancreatic islet PP cells. It has a high affinity for the Y4 receptor, via which it is thought to reduce food intake [70]. Peripheral administration of PP in rodents and humans reduces food intake [71–73]. However, PP also has a short half-life in vivo, limiting its potential as a treatment for obesity.

Longer acting PP analogues have been synthesized and have shown therapeutic promise. Lipidation of human PP (hPP) with palmitic acid increases its anorectic efficacy in mice [74]. PP 1420 is a peptidase resistant analogue of hPP, shown in phase I clinical trials to be well tolerated and to have a longer circulating half-life compared with the endogenous hormone [75].

Gut hormone combination therapies

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

The maintenance of energy balance involves a number of central and peripheral signals. Simultaneously targeting more than one of these components may improve the efficacy of anti-obesity drugs and in doing so, may better mimic the physiological control of appetite. Bariatric surgery elevates a number of anorectic gut hormones which are thought, in combination, to contribute to the weight loss observed following this surgery. The effects of administering various gut hormone combinations have therefore been investigated.

PYY3–36 potently reduces appetite, but is strongly associated with treatment-induced nausea. A combined infusion of oxyntomodulin and PYY3–36, at doses not associated with nausea, has an additive anorectic effect in humans [76]. Although this method of administration is impractical for an obesity treatment, it highlights that these hormones work through different mechanisms that can be simultaneously exploited. Utilizing long acting gut hormone analogues in combination might therefore provide the prolonged action without the side effects required for a successful anti-obesity agent.

PYY3–36 and PP given in combination showed no additive effect compared with either treatment alone when administered intraperitoneally to mice or intravenously to humans [77]. However, obinepitide (TM30338), from 7TM Pharma, is a synthetic analogue of human PYY and PP that has been reported to have improved anorectic effects. It acts as a dual Y2 and Y4 receptor agonist and is designed to be administered as a once or twice daily subcutaneous injection. 7TM Pharma reported that obinepitide was safe and well tolerated and resulted in prolonged reductions in food intake compared with either hormone alone in phase I/II clinical trials [78]. The utility of combined PYY and PP treatment consequently requires further investigation.

Perhaps the most promising combination of gut hormones is that of GLP-17–36 and PYY3–36. This combination has been shown to have an additive anorectic effect in both mice and humans [79]. The administration of GLP-17–36 and PYY3–36 in combination at doses that do not reduce food intake individually significantly reduces food intake in genetically obese mice and in humans [79]. Most interestingly, a GLP-17–36 and PYY3–36 oral combination therapy utilizing sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC) delivery technology to mimic endogenous secretion of the peptides also has an additive anorectic effect in humans [80].

Oral administration is considered the most convenient and economical method of drug delivery and tends to encourage a higher rate of compliance than other administration routes [81]. However, gut hormone peptides are subject to rapid degradation in the digestive environment of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are poorly absorbed, severely limiting their oral bioactivity. SNAC technology, mentioned above, is an emerging strategy for the oral delivery of drugs. It is based on Emisphere's Eligen® Technology which facilitates the transport of compounds with low oral bioavailability, such as gut hormones, across biological membranes. SNAC is hydrophobic and forms non-covalent bonds with peptides, increasing their lipophilicity, and therefore improving their absorption across the GI epithelium. Upon crossing the GI epithelium, the drug should disassociate from the SNAC molecule, leaving it free to pass directly into the circulation and exercise its intended pharmacological action. Such a delivery system could be utilized to provide a pharmacological profile that closely resembles the physiological release of gut hormones. Additionally, the SNAC carrier is readily and safely eliminated by normal excretion pathways. Emisphere's Eligen® Technology has been successfully employed in the development of oral forms of heparin [82], insulin [83] and parathyroid hormone [84], and initial results suggest it may have utility as a delivery agent for gut hormones such as GLP-17–37 and PYY3–36[85, 86]. The development of anti-obesity drugs that can be delivered orally and are as efficacious as injectables would be of great clinical significance.

Targeting nutrient sensing receptors

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

An emerging field of anti-obesity research is the study of nutrient sensing receptors. Many nutrient sensing receptors present in the GI tract have been localized to the L-cells of the distal small intestine and colon. Stimulation of specific nutrient receptors, such as the sweet taste receptor, in immortalized and primary L-cell cultures has been shown to cause gut hormone release [87, 88]. However, there is currently very little in vivo data on these systems and thus the physiological relevance of these effects are unclear. The use of receptor knockout models will aid the investigation of the potential of these receptors as anti-obesity targets. Theoretically, directly targeting these nutrient sensing receptors to stimulate endogenous gut hormone release might provide a relatively physiological means of suppressing appetite and reducing energy intake. Stimulating the L-cell directly requires the specific receptor agonist or agonists used to avoid absorption and degradation in the upper GI tract. Several mechanisms have been developed for colon-targeted drug delivery including systems that are pH and time-dependent, pressure-controlled and microbiota activated. While each of these systems has limitations, the combination of two or more systems may improve the accuracy of site specific drug targeting [89]. The oral administration of nutrient sensing receptor agonists which stimulate the endogenous release of gut hormones may be an effective long term treatment for obesity, minimizing administration site-specific side effects and the potential risk of antibody development which can be linked to exogenous gut hormone treatment [41, 90].

The future of anti-obesity drug development

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests

It is likely that Qnexa® and Contrave® will be approved for the treatment of obesity in the foreseeable future. However, the development of safe drugs remains the biggest hurdle in the anti-obesity drug market. With the development of long acting gut hormone analogues and the additive anorectic effects seen with specific gut hormone combinations, the potential utility of gut hormones as a treatment for obesity remains high. Finally, with research into drug delivery mechanisms growing, it is possible that orally delivered gut hormone analogues represent the next generation of anti-obesity drugs.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Anti-obesity drugs currently in late phase development
  5. The utility of gut hormones as anti-obesity drugs
  6. Gut hormone combination therapies
  7. Targeting nutrient sensing receptors
  8. The future of anti-obesity drug development
  9. Competing Interests
  • 1
    Aresu M, Chaudhury M, Diment E, Fuller E, Gordon-Dseagu V, Gunning N, Mindell J, Nicholson S, Ogunbadejo T, Robinson C, Roderick P, Roth M, Shelton N, Tabassum F, Wardle H. Health survey for England – 2009: trend tables. The NHS information centre for health and social care. 2010.
  • 2
    Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker HP, Schaefer EJ. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 4353.
  • 3
    Powell AG, Apovian CM, Aronne LJ. New drug targets for the treatment of obesity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 90: 4051.
  • 4
    Vivus Inc. Press Release. New long-term data on QNEXA® show significant and sustained weight loss of greater than 10% over two years. 2010. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 5
    Vivus Inc. Press release. FDA Issues complete response letter to Vivus regarding new drug application for QNEXA®. 2010. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 6
    Orexigen®Therapeutics. Press release. FDA issues complete response to new drug application for Contrave for the management of obesity. 2011. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 7
    Arena Pharmaceuticals. Press release. FDA issues complete response letter for lorcaserin new drug application. 2010. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 8
    Vickers SP, Jackson HC, Cheetham SC. The utility of animal models to evaluate novel anti-obesity agents. Br J Pharmacol 2011; 164: 124862.
  • 9
    Mack CM, Moore CX, Jodka CM, Bhavsar S, Wilson JK, Hoyt JA, Roan JL, Vu C, Laugero KD, Parkes DG, Young AA. Antiobesity action of peripheral exenatide (exendin-4) in rodents: effects on food intake, body weight, metabolic status and side-effect measures. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006; 30: 133240.
  • 10
    Beyer CE, Dwyer JM, Piesla MJ, Platt BJ, Shen R, Rahman Z, Chan K, Manners MT, Samad TA, Kennedy JD, Bingham B, Whiteside GT. Depression-like phenotype following chronic CB1 receptor antagonism. Neurobiol Dis 2010; 39: 14855.
  • 11
    Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, Lainez MJ, Sandrini G, Wang SJ, Neto W, Vijapurkar U, Doyle A, Jacobs D. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis – results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol 2004; 251: 94350.
  • 12
    Vivus. Press release. Vivus resubmits Qnexa NDA to the FDA. 2011. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 13
    Vivus Inc. Press release. FDA advisory committee recommends approval of Qnexa®. 2012. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 14
    Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Plodkowski RA, Mudaliar S, Guttadauria M, Erickson J, Kim DD, Dunayevich E. Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 595605.
  • 15
    Orexigen®Therapeutics. Press release. Orexigen and FDA identify a clear and feasible path to approval for Contrave®. 2011. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 16
    Orexigen® Therapeutics, Inc. Press release. Orexigen® Announces Agreement From the FDA on a Special Protocol Assessment for the Contrave® Outcomes Trial. 2012. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 17
    Arena Pharmaceuticals. Press release. Arena and Eisai announce results of re-adjudication of rat mammary tumors from lorcaserin carcinogenicity study. 2011. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 18
    Thomsen WJ, Grottick AJ, Menzaghi F, Reyes-Saldana H, Espitia S, Yuskin D, Whelan K, Martin M, Morgan M, Chen W, Al-Shamma H, Smith B, Chalmers D, Behan D. Lorcaserin, a novel selective human 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C agonist: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 325: 57787.
  • 19
    Stanley S, Wynne K, Bloom S. Gastrointestinal satiety signals III. Glucagon-like peptide 1, oxyntomodulin, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004; 286: G6937.
  • 20
    Caro JF, Kolaczynski JW, Nyce MR, Ohannesian JP, Opentanova I, Goldman WH, Lynn RB, Zhang PL, Sinha MK, Considine RV. Decreased cerebrospinal-fluid/serum leptin ratio in obesity: a possible mechanism for leptin resistance. Lancet 1996; 348: 15961.
  • 21
    Schwartz MW, Peskind E, Raskind M, Boyko EJ, Porte D Jr. Cerebrospinal fluid leptin levels: relationship to plasma levels and to adiposity in humans. Nat Med 1996; 2: 58993.
  • 22
    Ramsey JJ, Kemnitz JW, Colman RJ, Cunningham D, Swick AG. Different central and peripheral responses to leptin in rhesus monkeys: brain transport may be limited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 32305.
  • 23
    Batterham RL, Cohen MA, Ellis SM, Le Roux CW, Withers DJ, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Inhibition of food intake in obese subjects by peptide YY3-36. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 9418.
  • 24
    Wynne K, Park AJ, Small CJ, Patterson M, Ellis SM, Murphy KG, Wren AM, Frost GS, Meeran K, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Subcutaneous oxyntomodulin reduces body weight in overweight and obese subjects: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes 2005; 54: 23905.
  • 25
    Naslund E, Gutniak M, Skogar S, Rossner S, Hellstrom PM. Glucagon-like peptide 1 increases the period of postprandial satiety and slows gastric emptying in obese men. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 52530.
  • 26
    Naslund E, Barkeling B, King N, Gutniak M, Blundell JE, Holst JJ, Rossner S, Hellstrom PM. Energy intake and appetite are suppressed by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in obese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 30411.
  • 27
    Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1, a gastrointestinal hormone with a pharmaceutical potential. Curr Med Chem 1999; 6: 100517.
  • 28
    Chelikani PK, Haver AC, Reidelberger RD. Intravenous infusion of glucagon-like peptide-1 potently inhibits food intake, sham feeding, and gastric emptying in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005; 288: R1695706.
  • 29
    De Silva A, Salem V, Long CJ, Makwana A, Newbould RD, Rabiner EA, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Matthews PM, Beaver JD, Dhillo WS. The gut hormones PYY(3-36) and GLP-1(7-36 amide) reduce food intake and modulate brain activity in appetite centers in humans. Cell Metab 2011; 14: 7006.
  • 30
    Rodriquez de Fonseca F, Navarro M, Alvarez E, Roncero I, Chowen JA, Maestre O, Gomez R, Munoz RM, Eng J, Blazquez E. Peripheral versus central effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on satiety and body weight loss in Zucker obese rats. Metabolism 2000; 49: 70917.
  • 31
    Pauly RP, Rosche F, Wermann M, McIntosh CH, Pederson RA, Demuth HU. Investigation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide-(1-42) and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) degradation in vitro by dipeptidyl peptidase IV using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. A novel kinetic approach. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 232229.
  • 32
    Deacon CF, Nauck MA, Toft-Nielsen M, Pridal L, Willms B, Holst JJ. Both subcutaneously and intravenously administered glucagon-like peptide I are rapidly degraded from the NH2-terminus in type II diabetic patients and in healthy subjects. Diabetes 1995; 44: 112631.
  • 33
    Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, Schmidt WE, Montanya E, Brett JH, Zychma M, Blonde L. Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). Lancet 2009; 374: 3947.
  • 34
    Novo Nordisk. Press release. Significant weight loss sustained in obese people treated with liraglutide for one year. 2008. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 35
    Anderson SL, Trujillo JM. Association of pancreatitis with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist use. Ann Pharmacother 2010; 44: 9049.
  • 36
    Lee PH, Stockton MD, Franks AS. Acute pancreatitis associated with liraglutide. Ann Pharmacother 2011; 45: e22.
  • 37
    Koehler JA, Baggio LL, Lamont BJ, Ali S, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation modulates pancreatitis-associated gene expression but does not modify the susceptibility to experimental pancreatitis in mice. Diabetes 2009; 58: 214861.
  • 38
    Tatarkiewicz K, Smith PA, Sablan EJ, Polizzi CJ, Aumann DE, Villescaz C, Hargrove DM, Gedulin BR, Lu MG, Adams L, Whisenant T, Roy D, Parkes DG. Exenatide does not evoke pancreatitis and attenuates chemically induced pancreatitis in normal and diabetic rodents. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 299: E107686.
  • 39
    Bjerre Knudsen L, Madsen LW, Andersen S, Almholt K, de Boer AS, Drucker DJ, Gotfredsen C, Egerod FL, Hegelund AC, Jacobsen H, Jacobsen SD, Moses AC, Molck AM, Nielsen HS, Nowak J, Solberg H, Thi TD, Zdravkovic M. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists activate rodent thyroid C-cells causing calcitonin release and C-cell proliferation. Endocrinology 2010; 151: 147386.
  • 40
    Hegedus L, Moses AC, Zdravkovic M, Le Thi T, Daniels GH. GLP-1 and calcitonin concentration in humans: lack of evidence of calcitonin release from sequential screening in over 5000 subjects with type 2 diabetes or nondiabetic obese subjects treated with the human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 85360.
  • 41
    Buse JB, Garber A, Rosenstock J, Schmidt WE, Brett JH, Videbaek N, Holst J, Nauck M. Liraglutide treatment is associated with a low frequency and magnitude of antibody formation with no apparent impact on glycemic response or increased frequency of adverse events: results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 1695702.
  • 42
    Dakin CL, Gunn I, Small CJ, Edwards CM, Hay DL, Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Oxyntomodulin inhibits food intake in the rat. Endocrinology 2001; 142: 424450.
  • 43
    Liu YL, Ford HE, Druce MR, Minnion JS, Field BC, Shillito JC, Baxter J, Murphy KG, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Subcutaneous oxyntomodulin analogue administration reduces body weight in lean and obese rodents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010; 34: 171525.
  • 44
    Baggio LL, Huang Q, Brown TJ, Drucker DJ. Oxyntomodulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 differentially regulate murine food intake and energy expenditure. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 54658.
  • 45
    Cohen MA, Ellis SM, Le Roux CW, Batterham RL, Park A, Patterson M, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Oxyntomodulin suppresses appetite and reduces food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 4696701.
  • 46
    Wynne K, Park AJ, Small CJ, Meeran K, Ghatei MA, Frost GS, Bloom SR. Oxyntomodulin increases energy expenditure in addition to decreasing energy intake in overweight and obese humans: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006; 30: 172936.
  • 47
    Parkinson JR, Chaudhri OB, Kuo YT, Field BC, Herlihy AH, Dhillo WS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Bell JD. Differential patterns of neuronal activation in the brainstem and hypothalamus following peripheral injection of GLP-1, oxyntomodulin and lithium chloride in mice detected by manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI). Neuroimage 2009; 44: 102231.
  • 48
    Dakin CL, Small CJ, Batterham RL, Neary NM, Cohen MA, Patterson M, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Peripheral oxyntomodulin reduces food intake and body weight gain in rats. Endocrinology 2004; 145: 268795.
  • 49
    Druce MR, Minnion JS, Field BC, Patel SR, Shillito JC, Tilby M, Beale KE, Murphy KG, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Investigation of structure-activity relationships of Oxyntomodulin (Oxm) using Oxm analogs. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 171222.
  • 50
    Santoprete A, Capito E, Carrington PE, Pocai A, Finotto M, Langella A, Ingallinella P, Zytko K, Bufali S, Cianetti S, Veneziano M, Bonelli F, Zhu L, Monteagudo E, Marsh DJ, Sinharoy R, Bianchi E, DPP-I PA. V-resistant, long-acting oxyntomodulin derivatives. J Pept Sci 2011; 17: 27080.
  • 51
    Kerr BD, Flatt PR, Gault VA. D-Ser2)Oxm[mPEG-PAL]: a novel chemically modified analogue of oxyntomodulin with antihyperglycaemic, insulinotropic and anorexigenic actions. Biochem Pharmacol 2010; 80: 172735.
  • 52
    Pocai A, Carrington PE, Adams JR, Wright M, Eiermann G, Zhu L, Du X, Petrov A, Lassman ME, Jiang G, Liu F, Miller C, Tota LM, Zhou G, Zhang X, Sountis MM, Santoprete A, Capito E, Chicchi GG, Thornberry N, Bianchi E, Pessi A, Marsh DJ, SinhaRoy R. Glucagon-like peptide 1/glucagon receptor dual agonism reverses obesity in mice. Diabetes 2009; 58: 225866.
  • 53
    Kokrashvili Z, Mosinger B, Margolskee RF. Taste signaling elements expressed in gut enteroendocrine cells regulate nutrient-responsive secretion of gut hormones. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 822S5S.
  • 54
    Eberlein GA, Eysselein VE, Schaeffer M, Layer P, Grandt D, Goebell H, Niebel W, Davis M, Lee TD, Shively JE, Reeve JR. A new molecular form of PYY: structural characterization of human PYY(3-36) and PYY(1-36). Peptides 1989; 10: 797803.
  • 55
    Mentlein R, Dahms P, Grandt D, Kruger R. Proteolytic processing of neuropeptide Y and peptide YY by dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Regul Pept 1993; 49: 13344.
  • 56
    Sloth B, Holst JJ, Flint A, Gregersen NT, Astrup A. Effects of PYY1-36 and PYY3-36 on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure, glucose and fat metabolism in obese and lean subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 292: E10628.
  • 57
    Challis BG, Pinnock SB, Coll AP, Carter RN, Dickson SL, O'Rahilly S. Acute effects of PYY3-36 on food intake and hypothalamic neuropeptide expression in the mouse. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 311: 9159.
  • 58
    Chelikani PK, Haver AC, Reidelberger RD. Intravenous infusion of peptide YY(3-36) potently inhibits food intake in rats. Endocrinology 2005; 146: 87988.
  • 59
    Degen L, Oesch S, Casanova M, Graf S, Ketterer S, Drewe J, Beglinger C. Effect of peptide YY3-36 on food intake in humans. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 14306.
  • 60
    Batterham RL, Cowley MA, Small CJ, Herzog H, Cohen MA, Dakin CL, Wren AM, Brynes AE, Low MJ, Ghatei MA, Cone RD, Bloom SR. Gut hormone PYY(3-36) physiologically inhibits food intake. Nature 2002; 418: 6504.
  • 61
    Chelikani PK, Haver AC, Reidelberger RD. Intermittent intraperitoneal infusion of peptide YY(3-36) reduces daily food intake and adiposity in obese rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R3946.
  • 62
    Reidelberger RD, Haver AC, Chelikani PK, Buescher JL. Effects of different intermittent peptide YY (3-36) dosing strategies on food intake, body weight, and adiposity in diet-induced obese rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008; 295: R44958.
  • 63
    Lluis F, Fujimura M, Gomez G, Salva JA, Greeley GH Jr, Thompson JC. [Cellular localization, half-life, and secretion of peptide YY]. Rev Esp Fisiol 1989; 45: 37784.
  • 64
    le Roux CW, Borg CM, Murphy KG, Vincent RP, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Supraphysiological doses of intravenous PYY3-36 cause nausea, but no additional reduction in food intake. Ann Clin Biochem 2008; 45: 935.
  • 65
    Medeiros MD, Turner AJ. Processing and metabolism of peptide-YY: pivotal roles of dipeptidylpeptidase-IV, aminopeptidase-P, and endopeptidase-24.11. Endocrinology 1994; 134: 208894.
  • 66
    Addison ML, Minnion JS, Shillito JC, Suzuki K, Tan TM, Field BC, Germain-Zito N, Becker-Pauly C, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Murphy KG. A role for metalloendopeptidases in the breakdown of the gut hormone, PYY3-36. Endocrinology 2011; 152: 463040.
  • 67
    Ortiz AA, Milardo LF, DeCarr LB, Buckholz TM, Mays MR, Claus TH, Livingston JN, Mahle CD, Lumb KJ. A novel long-acting selective neuropeptide Y2 receptor polyethylene glycol-conjugated peptide agonist reduces food intake and body weight and improves glucose metabolism in rodents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2007; 323: 692700.
  • 68
    DeCarr LB, Buckholz TM, Milardo LF, Mays MR, Ortiz A, Lumb KJ. A long-acting selective neuropeptide Y2 receptor PEGylated peptide agonist reduces food intake in mice. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007; 17: 19169.
  • 69
    Shechter Y, Tsubery H, Mironchik M, Rubinstein M, Fridkin M. Reversible PEGylation of peptide YY3-36 prolongs its inhibition of food intake in mice. FEBS Lett 2005; 579: 243944.
  • 70
    Sainsbury A, Shi YC, Zhang L, Aljanova A, Lin Z, Nguyen AD, Herzog H, Lin S. Y4 receptors and pancreatic polypeptide regulate food intake via hypothalamic orexin and brain-derived neurotropic factor dependent pathways. Neuropeptides 2010; 44: 2618.
  • 71
    Malaisse-Lagae F, Carpentier JL, Patel YC, Malaisse WJ, Orci L. Pancreatic polypeptide: a possible role in the regulation of food intake in the mouse. Hypothesis Cell Mol Life Sci 1977; 33: 9157.
  • 72
    Batterham RL, Le Roux CW, Cohen MA, Park AJ, Ellis SM, Patterson M, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Pancreatic polypeptide reduces appetite and food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 398992.
  • 73
    Jesudason DR, Monteiro MP, McGowan BM, Neary NM, Park AJ, Philippou E, Small CJ, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Low-dose pancreatic polypeptide inhibits food intake in man. Br J Nutr 2007; 97: 4269.
  • 74
    Bellmann-Sickert K, Elling CE, Madsen AN, Little PB, Lundgren K, Gerlach LO, Bergmann R, Holst B, Schwartz TW, Beck-Sickinger AG. Long-acting lipidated analogue of human pancreatic polypeptide is slowly released into circulation. J Med Chem 2011; 54: 265867.
  • 75
    Tan TM, Field BC, Minnion JS, Cuenco-Shillito J, Chambers ES, Zac-Varghese S, Brindley CJ, Mt-Isa S, Fiorentino F, Ashby D, Ward I, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and tolerability of a novel analogue of human pancreatic polypeptide, PP 1420. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 73: 2329.
  • 76
    Field BC, Wren AM, Peters V, Baynes KC, Martin NM, Patterson M, Alsaraf S, Amber V, Wynne K, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. PYY3-36 and oxyntomodulin can be additive in their effect on food intake in overweight and obese humans. Diabetes 2010; 59: 16359.
  • 77
    Neary NM, McGowan BM, Monteiro MP, Jesudason DR, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. No evidence of an additive inhibitory feeding effect following PP and PYY 3-36 administration. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 143840.
  • 78
    Pharma TM. Press release. 7TM Pharma obtains patent protection for the use of both obinepitide and TM30339 in the treatment of obesity. 2007. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 79
    Neary NM, Small CJ, Druce MR, Park AJ, Ellis SM, Semjonous NM, Dakin CL, Filipsson K, Wang F, Kent AS, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Peptide YY3-36 and glucagon-like peptide-17-36 inhibit food intake additively. Endocrinology 2005; 146: 51207.
  • 80
    Steinert RE, Poller B, Castelli MC, Drewe J, Beglinger C. Oral administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 or peptide YY 3-36 affects food intake in healthy male subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 8107.
  • 81
    Gomez-Orellana I. Strategies to improve oral drug bioavailability. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005; 2: 41933.
  • 82
    Majuru S. Advances in the oral delivery of heparin from solid dosage forms using Emisphere's Eligen (R) oral drug delivery technology. Drug Dev 2004; 4: 849.
  • 83
    Kidron M, Dinh S, Menachem Y, Abbas R, Variano B, Goldberg M, Arbit E, Bar-On H. A novel per-oral insulin formulation: proof of concept study in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 3547.
  • 84
    Leone-Bay A, Sato M, Paton D, Hunt AH, Sarubbi D, Carozza M, Chou J, McDonough J, Baughman RA. Oral delivery of biologically active parathyroid hormone. Pharm Res 2001; 18: 96470.
  • 85
    Beglinger C, Poller B, Arbit E, Ganzoni C, Gass S, Gomez-Orellana I, Drewe J. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of oral GLP-1 and PYY3-36: a proof-of-concept study in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008; 84: 46874.
  • 86
    Emisphere. Press Release. Novo Nordisk starts phase I trial with long-acting oral GLP-1 analogue. 2010. Available at (last accessed 12 April 2012).
  • 87
    Jang HJ, Kokrashvili Z, Theodorakis MJ, Carlson OD, Kim BJ, Zhou J, Kim HH, Xu X, Chan SL, Juhaszova M, Bernier M, Mosinger B, Margolskee RF, Egan JM. Gut-expressed gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 1506974.
  • 88
    Steinert RE, Gerspach AC, Gutmann H, Asarian L, Drewe J, Beglinger C. The functional involvement of gut-expressed sweet taste receptors in glucose-stimulated secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY). Clin Nutr 2011; 30: 52432.
  • 89
    Patel MM. Cutting-edge technologies in colon-targeted drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2011; 8: 124758.
  • 90
    Russell-Jones D. The safety and tolerability of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type-2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 140214.