Funding sources Departmental Funds, Department of Dermatology, Section of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, Northwestern University.
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study
Version of Record online: 28 AUG 2011
© 2011 The Authors. BJD © 2011 British Association of Dermatologists
British Journal of Dermatology
Volume 165, Issue 3, pages 563–567, September 2011
How to Cite
Alam, M., Kim, N.A., Havey, J., Rademaker, A., Ratner, D., Tregre, B., West, D.P. and Coleman III, W.P. (2011), Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study. British Journal of Dermatology, 165: 563–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10432.x
Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Neither Northwestern University nor any of the investigators or study personnel received or expect to receive compensation, supplies, equipment or any other inducements, directly or indirectly, from the manufacturers or distributors of any of the study agents.
- Issue online: 28 AUG 2011
- Version of Record online: 28 AUG 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 28 MAY 2011 10:24AM EST
- Accepted for publication11 May 2011
- 5An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2007..