Conflicts of interest None declared.
1365-2133/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=3d13800721e0d35da4d49e694f63a9d81054ca17)
1365-2133/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=9ea9b247f2d7101244b2bef959a0874a886ec363)
COMMENTARIES
You have free access to this content
Interventions for ‘rosacea’
Article first published online: 27 SEP 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10590.x
© 2011 The Author. BJD © 2011 British Association of Dermatologists
Additional Information
How to Cite
Powell, F.C. and Ni Raghallaigh, S. (2011), Interventions for ‘rosacea’. British Journal of Dermatology, 165: 707–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10590.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 27 SEP 2011
References
- 1. 1931–1971: a critical review with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the Year 2000 (Teeling-Smith G, Wells N, eds). London: Office of Health Economics, 1979; 1–11.
- 2, . Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration. Meeting the challenge of Archie Cochrane and facing up to some new ones. Br Med J 2001; 323:821–32.
- 3, , et al. What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is ‘insufficient evidence’? J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50:635–9.
- 4, , et al. Effective and evidence-based management strategies for rosacea: summary of a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:760–81.Direct Link:
- 5, , et al. Standard classification of rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46:584–7.
- 6, . Maintenance therapy: acne as a chronic disease. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164:1181–2.Direct Link:
- 7. The Ballad of Reading Gaol. London: Smithers, 1898.