Get access

Relationship between behaviour problems and perceived parenting practices in Korean youth

Authors

  • D. H. Kim,

    1. College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Y. S. Kim,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
    2. Child Study Center, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
    3. Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research and New York University, New York, NY, USA
      Young Shin Kim, Child Study Center, Yale University, School of Medicine, 230 S. Frontage Rd, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. E-mail: young-shin.kim@yale.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Y-J. Koh,

    1. The Korea Institute for Children's Social Development
    Search for more papers by this author
  • B. L. Leventhal

    1. Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
    2. Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research and New York University, New York, NY, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Young Shin Kim, Child Study Center, Yale University, School of Medicine, 230 S. Frontage Rd, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. E-mail: young-shin.kim@yale.edu

Abstract

Background  Parenting practices have been accepted as powerful risk factors for behaviour problems, even though previous studies have suffered from significant methodological problems, such as small, non-representative samples, cross-sectional study designs, poor control for confounders, and minimal consideration of paternal parenting. This study examined whether three, specific maternal and paternal parenting practices are associated with internalizing and externalizing behavioural problems in youth.

Methods  A prospective, longitudinal, cohort study was conducted among 1641 seventh- and eighth-grade students from representative sample of middle school students. The measurements were the Korean Youth Self Report and the Childrearing Behavior Questionnaire (measuring three dimensions of parenting practice: warmth–acceptance, rejection–restriction and permissiveness–non-intervention). Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results  Maternal rejection–restriction increased risks for internalizing problems (OR = 1.112), whereas paternal control–rejection increased risks for externalizing behavioural problem (OR = 1.125).

Conclusions  Specific parenting practices showed differential associations with youth behaviour problems. These results suggest that further studies are necessary to understand the importance of unique and shared parenting practices as well as their interactions with other factors in the aetiology of youth behaviour problems. In the meantime, these findings point to therapeutic opportunities for both parents and their children.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary