Background In order to enable reproducible and comparable exposure measurements of fungal alpha-amylase (α-amylase) in different laboratories and countries, the entire procedure from sampling of airborne dust to measuring extracted samples (including standards and the used enzyme) immunoassays must be standardized. The aim of this study was to establish optimal elution and assay conditions.
Methods A parallel sampler was used for simultaneous collection of 10 samples of inhalable dust in bakeries and mills in Germany, England, the Netherlands and Spain. Three enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs) for detection of fungal α-amylase based on monoclonal antibodies or polyclonal antibodies were used for the measurement of the parallel-sampled filters (n=432) extracted using several methods. The results were analysed by regression analysis of variance. Additional filters (n=54) were extracted and analysed using two EIAs to investigate the storage stability of the extracts.
Results Although α-amylase concentrations correlated well (r0.88), differences were found between the EIAs in the sensitivity and nominal values (up to a mean factor 5.8). The best elution medium for airborne filters (phosphate-buffered saline ‘PBS’ with 0.05% Tween-20) led to 1.2 to two times higher α-amylase allergen yields than extraction in PBS only, while higher Tween-20 concentrations decreased the extracted α-amylase yield. During storage of frozen dust/filter extracts for 3–4 months at −20°C, a loss of approximately 40% of measurable α-amylase was observed, which could be partially prevented by addition of 0.1% casein to the medium directly after extraction.
Conclusion Although the effects of only a few of many possible causes of variation were investigated, for these factors a clear choice could be made with regard to optimal elution conditions and the use of validated EIAs with calibrated standards, thus making significant progress towards a completely standardized procedure for airborne α-amylase measurements.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.