Background Allergy diagnostic systems sometimes give false positive or negative results. In this respect, the influence of protein conformational changes on the allergen–IgE interaction sites is worthy to be investigated.
Objective To investigate the influence of different experimental conditions on the structural properties and IgE reactivity of kiwellin (Act d 5) as a model system.
Methods Act d 5 was purified from the natural source. To study its conformational features, experiments of circular dichroism (CD) in different media were performed. The IgE reactivity was investigated by skin testing, immunoblotting and ISAC microarray system, in a population of kiwifruit allergic subjects.
Results CD experiments indicated that Act d 5 has a mainly helical structure and the conformation is strongly affected by the experimental conditions. The protein is more structured in low polarity media and at acidic pH values, similar to those of the natural source. Eleven subjects of 29 (38%) allergic to kiwifruit were positive to purified natural Act d 5 by skin test. Among them, three patients (10%) showed a reaction only to Act d 5 at pH 4.5, and three (10%) showed a reaction only to the allergen in standard neutral conditions. No one of the 11 subjects with positive skin test recognized Act d 5 immobilized on the ISAC system. Eight of nine subjects detected Act d 5 by IgE immunoblotting. One subject did not recognize the sequence epitopes of Act d 5 in IgE immunoblotting experiments and reacted to the skin test only when the allergen was in acidic conditions.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance The conformation and IgE reactivity of Act d 5 are affected by the physico-chemical characteristics of the solvent. These findings suggest that the assay conditions influence the results of the diagnostic systems by modulating the pattern of exposed antigenic epitopes.
Cite this as: M. L. Bernardi, D. Picone, L. Tuppo, I. Giangrieco, G. Petrella, P. Palazzo, R. Ferrara, M. Tamburrini, A. Mari and M. A. Ciardiello, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 1819–1826.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.