SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    K. Sigurdsson, Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?, Cytopathology, 2013, 24, 4
  2. 2
    C. A. Faraker, J. Greenfield, Transformation zone sampling rate used as a performance indicator for cervical liquid-based cytology sample-takers, Cytopathology, 2013, 24, 4
  3. 3
    J. H. F. Smith, ABC3 Part I: a review of the guidelines for terminology, classification and management of cervical cytology in England, Cytopathology, 2012, 23, 6
  4. 4
    R. G. Blanks, ABC3 Part II: a review of the new criteria for evaluating cervical cytology in England, Cytopathology, 2012, 23, 6
  5. 5
    S. Lönnberg, P. Nieminen, L. Kotaniemi-Talonen, H. Kujari, J. Melkko, G. Granroth, M. Vornanen, T. Pietiläinen, J. Arola, J. Tarkkanen, T. Luostarinen, A. Anttila, Large performance variation does not affect outcome in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, Cytopathology, 2012, 23, 3
  6. 6
    R. G. Blanks, R. S. Kelly, Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid-based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high-grade dyskaryosis?, Cytopathology, 2010, 21, 6