Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California’s coastal vineyards
Article first published online: 1 OCT 2007
2007 The Royal Entomological Society
Volume 32, Issue 6, pages 583–596, December 2007
How to Cite
DAANE, K. M., SIME, K. R., FALLON, J. and COOPER, M. L. (2007), Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California’s coastal vineyards. Ecological Entomology, 32: 583–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00910.x
- Issue published online: 1 OCT 2007
- Article first published online: 1 OCT 2007
- Accepted 1 February 2007First published online 1 October 2007
- Ant–homopteran mutualism;
- biological control;
- invasive species;
- Leptomastix epona;
- Linepithema humile;
- Pseudaphycus flavidulus;
- Pseudococcus maritimus;
- Pseudococcus viburni;
- spatial refuge
Abstract 1. The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, tends honeydew-excreting homopterans and can disrupt the activity of their natural enemies. This mutualism is often cited for increases in homopteran densities; however, the ant’s impact on natural enemies may be only one of several effects of ant tending that alters insect densities. To test for the variable impacts of ants, mealybug and natural enemy densities were monitored on ant-tended and ant-excluded vines in two California vineyard regions.
2. Ant tending increased densities of the obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni, and lowered densities of its encyrtid parasitoids Pseudaphycus flavidulus and Leptomastix epona. Differences in parasitoid recovery rates suggest that P. flavidulus was better able to forage on ant-tended vines than L. epona.
3. Densities of a coccinellid predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, were higher on ant-tended vines, where there were more mealybugs. Together with behavioural observations, the results showed that this predator can forage in patches of ant-tended mealybugs, and that it effectively mimics mealybugs to avoid disturbance by ants.
4. Ant tending increased densities of the grape mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus, by increasing the number of surviving first-instar mealybugs. Parasitoids were nearly absent from the vineyard infested with P. maritimus. Therefore, ants improved either mealybug habitat or fitness.
5. There was no difference in mealybug distribution or seasonal development patterns on ant-tended and ant-excluded vines, indicating that ants did not move mealybugs to better feeding locations or create a spatial refuge from natural enemies.
6. Results showed that while Argentine ants were clearly associated with increased mealybug densities, it is not a simple matter of disrupting natural enemies. Instead, ant tending includes benefits independent of the effect on natural enemies. Moreover, the effects on different natural enemy species varied, as some species thrive in the presence of ants.