Current address: Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich & EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Host genotype affects the relative success of competing lines of aphid parasitoids under superparasitism
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 The Royal Entomological Society
Volume 35, Issue 1, pages 77–83, February 2010
How to Cite
VORBURGER, C., EUGSTER, B., VILLIGER, J. and WIMMER, C. (2010), Host genotype affects the relative success of competing lines of aphid parasitoids under superparasitism. Ecological Entomology, 35: 77–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01159.x
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2010
- Accepted 4 November 2009
- Aphis fabae;
- genotype-by-genotype interaction;
- Hamiltonella defensa;
- Lysiphlebus fabarum;
1. In solitary parasitoids, only one individual can complete development in a given host. Therefore, solitary parasitoids tend to prefer unparasitised hosts for oviposition, yet under high parasitoid densities, superparasitism is frequent and results in fierce competition for the host's limited resources. This may lead to selection for the best intra-host competitors.
2. Increased intra-host competitive ability may evolve under a high risk of superparasitism if this trait exhibits genetic variation, and if competitive differences among parasitoid genotypes are consistent across environments, e.g. different host genotypes.
3. These assumptions were addressed in the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) and its main host, the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae (Scopoli) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Three parthenogenetic lines of L. fabarum were allowed to parasitise three aphid clones singly and in all pairwise combinations (superparasitism). The winning parasitoid in superparasitised aphids was determined by microsatellite analysis.
4. The proportions of singly parasitised aphids that were mummified were similar for the three parasitoid lines and did not differ significantly among host clones.
5. Under superparasitism, significant biases in favour of one parasitoid line were observed for some combinations, indicating that there is genetic variation for intra-host competitive ability. However, the outcome of superparasitism was inconsistent across aphid clones and thus influenced significantly by the host clone in which parasitoids competed.
6. Overall, this study shows that the fitness of aphid parasitoids under superparasitism is determined by complex interactions with competitors as well as hosts, possibly hampering the evolution of improved intra-host competitive ability.