SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aarssen L.W., Tregenza T., Budden A.E., Lortie C.J., Koricheva J. & Leimu R. (2008) Bang for your buck: rejection rates and impact factors in ecological journals. The Open Ecology Journal, 1, 1419.
  • Bady P., Dolédec S., Fesl C., Gayraud S., Bacchi M. & Schöll F. (2005) Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: the effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshwater Biology, 50, 159173.
  • Bollen J., Van de Sompel H., Hagberg A. & Chute R. (2009) A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4, e6022.
  • Borchardt D. & Statzner B. (1990) Ecological impact of urban stormwater runoff studied in experimental flumes: population loss by drift and availability of refugial space. Aquatic Sciences, 52, 299314.
  • Borgman C.L. (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure and the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Borsuk R.M., Budden A.E., Leimu R., Aarssen L.W. & Lortie C.J. (2009) The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology. The Open Ecology Journal, 2, 2528.
  • Boyer E. (1997) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Brown H. (2007) How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science. British Medical Journal, 334, 561564.
  • Cassey P. & Blackburn T.M. (2004) Publication and rejection among successful ecologists. BioScience, 54, 234239.
  • Day R.A. (1979) How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. ISI Press, Philadelphia.
  • Dolédec S. & Statzner B. (2008) Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an assessment of specific types of human impact. Freshwater Biology, 53, 617634.
  • Donaldson M.R., Hasler C.T., Hanson K.C., Clark T.D., Hinch S.G. & Cooke S.J. (2010) Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 17.
  • Gayraud S., Statzner B., Bady P., Haybach A., Schöll F., Usseglio-Polatera P. & Bacchi M. (2003) Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of alternative metrics. Freshwater Biology, 48, 20452064.
  • Greaves S., Scott J., Clarke M., Miller L., Hannay T., Thomas A. & Campbell P. (2006) Overview: nature’s trial of open peer review. Nature Web Debate: Peer Review, doi: 10:1038/nature05535.
  • Grim T. (2008) A possible role of social activity to explain differences in publication output among ecologists. Oikos, 117, 484487.
  • Grod O.N., Lortie C.J. & Budden A.E. (2010) Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 187192.
  • Harley D., Acord S.K., Earl-Novell S., Lawrence S. & King C.J. (2010) Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Hildrew A.G. & Townsend C.R. (2007) Freshwater Biology– looking back, looking forward. Freshwater Biology, 52, 18631867.
  • Hochberg M.E., Chase J.M., Gotelli N.J., Hastings A. & Naeem S. (2009) The tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ecology Letters, 12, 24.
  • Jennings C. (2006) Quality and value: the true purpose of peer review. Nature Web Debate: Peer Review, doi: 10.1038/nature05032.
  • Leimu R. & Koricheva J. (2005) What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 2832.
  • Mabe M. (2003) The growth and number of journals. Serials, 16, 191197.
  • Malmer N. & Enckell P.H. (1994) Ecological research at the beginning of the next century. Oikos, 71, 171176.
  • Mulligan A. (2004) Is peer review in crisis? Perspectives in Publishing, 2, 16. Available at: http://www.elsevier.com/framework_editors/pdfs/PerspPubl2.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2010.
  • Mulligan A. & Raphael E. (2010) Peer review in a changing world – preliminary findings of a global study. Serials: the Journal for the Serials Community, 23, 2534.
  • Neumann N. & Nützmann G. (Eds) (2009) Jahresforschungsbericht 2008. Leibnitz-Institut für Gewässerökologie und Binnenfischerei, Berlin.
  • Resnik D.B., Gutierrez-Ford C. & Peddada S. (2008) Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 305310.
  • Sarkozy N. (2009) Discours à l’occasion du lancement de la réflexion pour une stratégie nationale de recherche et d’innovation. Available at: http://www.elysee.fr/elyseetheque.
  • Statzner B. & Peltret O. (2006) Assessing potential abiotic and biotic complications of crayfish-induced gravel transport in experimental streams. Geomorphology, 74, 245256.
  • Statzner B. & Sagnes P. (2008) Crayfish and fish as bioturbators of streambed sediments: assessing joint effects of species with different mechanistic abilities. Geomorphology, 93, 267287.
  • Statzner B., Resh V.H. & Kobzina N. (1995) Scale effects on impact factors of scientific journals: ecology compared to other fields. Oikos, 72, 440443.
  • Statzner B., Fièvet E., Champagne J.-Y., Morel R. & Herouin E. (2000) Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: biological behavior affects sand and gravel erosion in experimental streams. Limnology & Oceanography, 45, 10301040.
  • Statzner B., Hildrew A.G. & Resh V.H. (2001) Species traits and environmental constraints: entomological research and the history of ecological theory. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 291316.
  • Statzner B., Peltret O. & Tomanova S. (2003a) Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: effect of a biomass gradient on baseflow and flood-induced transport of gravel and sand in experimental streams. Freshwater Biology, 48, 147163.
  • Statzner B., Sagnes P., Champagne J.-Y. & Viboud S. (2003b) Contribution of benthic fish to the patch dynamics of gravel and sand transport in streams. Water Resources Research, 39, 13091325, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002270.
  • Statzner B., Bady P., Dolédec S. & Schöll F. (2005) Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of trait patterns in least impacted river reaches. Freshwater Biology, 50, 21362161.
  • Suber P. (2010) Open Access in 2009. Open Access Newsletter, 141. Available at: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-10.htm#2009. Accessed 4 August 2010.
  • Swan A. (2010) Modelling Scholarly Communication Options: Costs and Benefits for Universities. Joint Information Systems Committee, Bristol, London. Available at: http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/442/.
  • Tockner K., Robinson C.T. & Uehlinger U. (Eds) (2009) Rivers of Europe. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Ware M. (2005) Online submission and peer-review systems. Learned Publishing, 18, 245250.