Subsidy-stress and multiple-stressor effects along gradients of deposited fine sediment and dissolved nutrients in a regional set of streams and rivers
Article first published online: 6 JUN 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 56, Issue 9, pages 1916–1936, September 2011
How to Cite
WAGENHOFF, A., TOWNSEND, C. R., PHILLIPS, N. and MATTHAEI, C. D. (2011), Subsidy-stress and multiple-stressor effects along gradients of deposited fine sediment and dissolved nutrients in a regional set of streams and rivers. Freshwater Biology, 56: 1916–1936. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02619.x
- Issue published online: 4 AUG 2011
- Article first published online: 6 JUN 2011
- (Manuscript accepted 21 April 2011)
- agricultural runoff;
- macroinvertebrate traits;
- model selection;
- synergistic interaction;
- water management
1. Stream managers need to understand relationships between multiple stressors and ecological responses. We examined responses of benthic invertebrates and algae along two land-use-related stressor gradients of concern in running waters. Our correlative study of the consequences of augmented deposited fine sediment and nutrient concentrations was conducted in a regional set of streams and rivers monitored by a water management authority in New Zealand and incorporated a wide range of catchment geologies and stream orders.
2. We used multiple linear regression analysis and an information-theoretic approach to select the best predictive models for our biological response variables by testing multiple competing hypotheses that include nonlinear subsidy-stress relationships and interactive effects between the two stressors.
3. Patterns consistent with a subsidy-stress response to increasing dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentration were found for the relative abundances of the common invertebrate genera Pycnocentrodes and Deleatidium and for the relative abundance of total individuals in the EPT orders (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera).
4. Fine sediment seemed the more pervasive stressor, apparently counteracting and overwhelming any initial subsidy effect of increased nutrients, and accounting for more of the variance in biological response variables. Relationships with high nutrient concentrations were weaker and modelled with less certainty, probably reflecting the indirect modes of action of nutrients compared to those underlying sediment effects. Nevertheless, in several cases, the models indicated that nutrients interacted synergistically with fine sediment, lending further weight to the conclusion that managers need to address both stressors to achieve the best outcomes.