Present address: PREC Institute Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Light-acquisition and use of individuals as influenced by elevated CO2 in even-aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album
Article first published online: 11 DEC 2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2003.00793.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hikosaka, K., Yamano, T., Nagashima, H. and Hirose, T. (2003), Light-acquisition and use of individuals as influenced by elevated CO2 in even-aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album. Functional Ecology, 17: 786–795. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2003.00793.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 11 DEC 2003
- Received 24 February 2003; revised 4 July 2003; accepted 20 July 2003
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- CO2 elevation;
- competition;
- light-acquisition efficiency;
- light-use efficiency;
- size structure;
- whole-plant photosynthesis
Summary
- 1We studied the effect of CO2 elevation on photosynthesis and growth of individuals in even-aged monospecific stands of an annual, Chenopodium album, established at ambient and doubled CO2 concentrations in open-top chambers.
- 2The whole-plant photosynthesis of every individual in the stand was calculated from (1) the distribution of light and leaf nitrogen and (2) the relationships between photosynthetic parameters and leaf nitrogen content per area. Elevated CO2 increased light-saturated rates of photosynthesis by 10–15% and the initial slope of the light-response curve by 11%, but had no effect on the convexity of the light-response curve and dark respiration.
- 3The relative rate of photosynthesis (RPR, the rate of photosynthesis per unit above-ground mass) was analysed as the product of light capture (Φmass, the photon flux captured per unit above-ground mass) and light-use efficiency (LUE, plant photosynthesis per unit photon capture).
- 4At an early stage of stand development (33 days after germination), RPR was nearly constant and no difference was found between ambient and elevated CO2. However, CO2 elevation influenced the components of RPR such that the reduction in Φmass at elevated CO2 offsets the effect of the higher LUE. Later (47 days), RPR was positively correlated with plant mass at both CO2 concentrations. When compared at an equal plant mass, RPR was lower at elevated CO2, which was caused by a reduction in Φmass despite some compensation by higher LUE.
- 5We conclude that elevated CO2 increases size inequality of a stand through enhanced photosynthesis and growth of dominants, which reduce the light availability for subordinates and consequently increase size inequality in the stand.

1365-2435/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=c8b848a8f001fdfa90240fe2ab26b1f04b6fe8e4)
1365-2435/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2cf6e00d281371851f86902da3937ac5884bcfe0)
