Cichlid jaw mechanics: linking morphology to feeding specialization

Authors

  • C. D. HULSEY,

    Corresponding author
    1. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee – Knoxville, 569 Dabney, Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA,
    2. Center for Population Biology, University of California – Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis CA 95616, USA,
      †Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Darrin Hulsey, School of Biology, Georgia Tech, 310 Ferst Drive, Atlanta GA 30332-0230, USA. E-mail: dh251@mail.gatech.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • F. J. GARCÍA DE LEÓN

    1. Laboratorio de Biología Integrativa, Instituto Tecnológico de Cuidad Victoria (ITCV), Cuidad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México, and
    2. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noreste, Program of Conservation and Environmental Planning, La Paz, BCS, México
    Search for more papers by this author

†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Darrin Hulsey, School of Biology, Georgia Tech, 310 Ferst Drive, Atlanta GA 30332-0230, USA. E-mail: dh251@mail.gatech.edu

Summary

  • 1The utility of the anterior jaw four-bar linkage model and the trophic consequences of jaw protrusion were investigated in Heroine cichlids by examining the evolutionary relationships among maxillary kinematic transmission (KT), maximum jaw protrusion and dietary specialization on evasive prey.
  • 2In 31 species of Heroine cichlids, a four-bar linkage model was used to generate kinematic predictions of maxillary KT, the angular amount of maxilla rotation per unit lower jaw rotation, expected during mouth opening. Maxillary KT averaged 0·79 and ranged from 0·58 in Herichthys tamasopoensis to 1·06 in Petenia splendida.
  • 3Because the maxilla pushes the toothed premaxilla out during jaw protrusion, we predicted higher maxillary KT should characterize species with greater maximum jaw protrusion. Maximum jaw protrusion ranged from 1·5 to 14·2% of cichlid standard length and was highly correlated with greater maxillary KT.
  • 4The proportion of fish and crustaceans in the diet of these cichlids was correlated with maximum protrusion, suggesting jaw protrusion may aid in the capture of evasive prey.
  • 5Phylogenetic independent contrasts indicate changes in anterior jaw mechanics may be necessary for diversification of cichlid jaw protrusion abilities, and the labile evolution of jaw protrusion in Heroine cichlids likely facilitated the repeated specialization on evasive prey during their diversification.

Ancillary