You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Growth–survival trade-offs and allometries in rosette-forming perennials

  1. C. J. E. METCALF1,†,*,
  2. M. REES2,
  3. J. M. ALEXANDER3,
  4. K. ROSE2

Article first published online: 19 APR 2006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01084.x

Issue

Functional Ecology

Functional Ecology

Volume 20, Issue 2, pages 217–225, April 2006

Additional Information

How to Cite

METCALF, C. J. E., REES, M., ALEXANDER, J. M. and ROSE, K. (2006), Growth–survival trade-offs and allometries in rosette-forming perennials. Functional Ecology, 20: 217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01084.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Center for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK,

  2. 2

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

  3. 3

    Geobotanisches Institut, Zürichbergstrasse 38, 8044 Zürich, Switzerland

  1. †

    Present address: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuse-Straße 1, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

* †Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Metcalf@demogr.mpg.de

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 19 APR 2006
  2. Article first published online: 19 APR 2006
  3. Received 6 September 2005; revised 4 November 2005; accepted 8 November 2005 Editor: J. Cresswell

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (359K)

Keywords:

  • allometry;
  • demography;
  • monocarp;
  • relative growth rate (RGR);
  • specific leaf area (SLA)

Summary

  • 1
    Demographic rates such as growth and survival may interact directly as a result of allocation constraints, or indirectly through their relationship with structural characteristics.
  • 2
    We explored the relationship between growth and survival in a range of rosette-forming species across different habitats, and investigated possible mechanistic explanations for the patterns we found.
  • 3
    Results indicated a negative association between growth and survival in small plants across species in different habitats. There was no relationship for large plants.
  • 4
    Relative growth rate (RGR) was positively correlated to specific leaf area (SLA), but unrelated to the percentage biomass allocated to roots. This argues against the hypothesized role of allocation to root mass in mediating the growth–survival trade-off.
  • 5
    The pattern of biomass partitioning was compared with the predictions of Enquist & Niklas (2002a) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295, 1517–1520. In agreement with their predictions, the overall relationship between above- and below-ground biomass was isometric. However, after accounting for species-specific effects it was found that allocation to roots varied widely between species and was size-dependent, suggesting that the conventional statistical analysis (double-log regression) may be insensitive to biologically important sources of variation.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (359K)