You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Maternal effects of carotenoid consumption in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Article first published online: 5 DEC 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01365.x
© 2007 The Authors
Additional Information
How to Cite
Grether, G. F., Kolluru, G. R., Lin, K., Quiroz, M. A., Robertson, G. and Snyder, A. J. (2008), Maternal effects of carotenoid consumption in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Functional Ecology, 22: 294–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01365.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 DEC 2007
- Article first published online: 5 DEC 2007
- Received 11 January 2007; accepted 30 October 2007Handling Editor: David Reznick
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- egg carotenoids;
- maternal effects;
- mate preference;
- offspring quality
Summary
- 1Carotenoids transferred from mother to offspring may enhance the quality of the offspring. Whether such maternal effects occur in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) has an important bearing on mate preference evolution.
- 2By raising female guppies from birth on different dietary carotenoid levels, we examined the pattern of carotenoid allocation to maternal tissue (skin) vs. eggs. Skin carotenoid content was only weakly affected by carotenoid intake while egg carotenoid content was strongly affected.
- 3We then tested for effects of maternal carotenoid intake on several measures of offspring quality, including size and condition at birth, juvenile growth rate, and the size, condition, skin carotenoid content and colouration of mature sons. To test for interactions between maternal and offspring carotenoid intake, broods were split and offspring were reared on one of two carotenoid levels.
- 4Offspring carotenoid intake had the expected effects on male colouration, but otherwise we found no evidence that maternal or offspring carotenoid intake influences offspring quality. It remains possible that maternal carotenoids affect offspring fitness parameters that we did not measure or that such effects depend on environmental factors that were absent in our laboratory aquaria.
- 5Our review of the literature on maternal carotenoid effects in birds and fishes suggests that such effects may be taxon-specific. Thus, it seems unwarranted to assume that an adaptive trade-off necessarily exists between allocation of carotenoids to eggs vs. maternal tissues. Alternative hypotheses, such as the possibility that eggs provide a means of excreting excess carotenoids, also merit consideration.
- 6Our results indirectly support the indicator model of mate preference evolution by casting doubt on an alternative hypothesis that requires females to benefit more from consuming carotenoids than males do.

1365-2435/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=c8b848a8f001fdfa90240fe2ab26b1f04b6fe8e4)
1365-2435/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2cf6e00d281371851f86902da3937ac5884bcfe0)
