You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectary production in Prunus avium
Article first published online: 28 JUN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01440.x
© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Pulice, C. E. and Packer, A. A. (2008), Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectary production in Prunus avium. Functional Ecology, 22: 801–807. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01440.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2008
- Article first published online: 28 JUN 2008
- Received 15 January 2008; accepted 14 May 2008; Handling Editor: Gaku Kudo
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- artificial damage;
- extrafloral nectaries;
- induced response;
- mutualism;
- Prunus avium;
- simulated herbivory
Summary
- 1Induced chemical responses to herbivory have been widely documented, however less attention has been given to the induced morphological defences, particularly those that mediate protection mutualisms. One of the most widely studied mutualisms is the ant–plant protection mutualism, in which ants and other predatory arthropods defend plants against herbivores in exchange for food or housing.
- 2Chemical and morphological traits that mediate this protection mutualism attract beneficial partners to plants. Thus induction of traits can lead to greater protection by mutualists when herbivores are present. In this study we examined whether extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) are induced in response to simulated herbivory in Prunus avium.
- 3In a greenhouse experiment, continuous damage to seedlings was simulated in two treatments intended to mimic different types of herbivores: (i) 50% of the area of each leaf was removed using a paper hole punch (e.g. insect herbivore simulation), and (ii) 50% of the area of each leaf was removed using scissors (e.g. browsing mammal simulation). Seedlings in the control group were not damaged.
- 4Post-treatment, damaged plants produced significantly more EFNs per leaf on pre-existing leaves, as well as those that emerged following the onset of damage, than plants in the control group. Regardless of treatment, leaves emerging earlier supported fewer EFNs than leaves emerging later in the experiment.
- 5Allocation to defence by seedlings, which have limited resources available, suggests the protection mutualism could be important to plant fitness in the field. Further study of patterns of EFN induction in P. avium seedlings is needed to better understand the significance of this induced response.

1365-2435/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=c8b848a8f001fdfa90240fe2ab26b1f04b6fe8e4)
1365-2435/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2cf6e00d281371851f86902da3937ac5884bcfe0)
