Dishonest signalling of fighting ability and multiple performance traits in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi

Authors

  • Simon P. Lailvaux,

    Corresponding author
    1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; and
      *Correspondence author. E-mail: s.lailvaux@unsw.edu.au
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Leeann T. Reaney,

    1. School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 0200
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Patricia R. Y. Backwell

    1. School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 0200
    Search for more papers by this author

*Correspondence author. E-mail: s.lailvaux@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

  • 1Signals used during male combat are expected to be honest indicators of fighting ability. However, recent studies show that dishonesty in male signalling is more prevalent than previously believed.
  • 2Here we show that regenerated (leptochelous) claws in male Uca mjoebergi fiddler crabs are not only dishonest signals of two types of whole-organism performance capacities that are likely to be useful during fights (claw closing force and pull-resisting force), but they are also less effective as weapons in situations where males are unable to bluff.
  • 3Original (brachychelous) male claws are statistically significant predictors (independent of body size) of both closing force and the force required to pull a male out of a tunnel. By contrast, leptochelous claw size does not convey information on those performance capacities following control for body size.
  • 4Furthermore, claw size affects fighting ability such that leptochelous residents are at a significant competitive disadvantage to brachychelous residents, although claw type does not affect the ability of non-resident males to win fights.
  • 5This study is among the first to show that male armaments can dishonestly signal performance traits that are likely important for winning fights, and is the first to show evidence for dishonest signalling of multiple components of fighting ability.

Ancillary