These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diet predicts intestine length in Lake Tanganyika’s cichlid fishes
Article first published online: 4 JUN 2009
© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 British Ecological Society
Volume 23, Issue 6, pages 1122–1131, December 2009
How to Cite
Wagner, C. E., McIntyre, P. B., Buels, K. S., Gilbert, D. M. and Michel, E. (2009), Diet predicts intestine length in Lake Tanganyika’s cichlid fishes. Functional Ecology, 23: 1122–1131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01589.x
- Issue published online: 9 NOV 2009
- Article first published online: 4 JUN 2009
- Received 3 November 2008; accepted 7 May 2009 Handling Editor: Peter Wainwright
- comparative analysis;
- phylogenetic generalized least squares;
- gut length;
- stable isotope;
- phenotypic plasticity;
- trophic differentiation;
- ecological stoichiometry;
- adaptive radiation
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
1. Among vertebrates, herbivores have longer digestive tracts than animals at higher trophic levels, a pattern thought to reflect a trade-off between digestive efficiency and tissue maintenance costs. However, phylogenetic influences on this pattern have rarely been considered. Taxa that have undergone diversification accompanied by dietary shifts provide a powerful opportunity to examine the relationship between diet and intestine length while accounting for phylogeny.
2. In this paper we assess the relationship between diet and intestine length in the cichlid fishes of Lake Tanganyika, which are renowned for their diversity of species and trophic strategies.
3. First, we test the effect of trophic position on intestine length across 32 species, while controlling for phylogeny. Trophic position was inferred from nitrogen stable isotopes, which provide a temporally integrated, quantitative perspective on the complex diets of tropical fish. Second, we examine patterns of intraspecific variation in intestine length of an algivorous cichlid (Tropheus brichardi) along a natural spatial gradient in algal nitrogen content.
4. Trophic position explains 51% of size-standardized variation in intestine length after accounting for phylogeny. Accounting for phylogeny does not substantially alter the relationship between trophic position and intestine length, despite the existence of phylogenetic signal in both traits. Thus, diet is a strong predictor of variation at the interspecific level.
5. There is a striking inverse relationship between intestine length and algal nutrient content among populations of T. brichardi, suggesting substantial plasticity in response to food quality, and thus a strong dietary influence on patterns of intraspecific variation.
6. Diet is a strong predictor of intestine length at both intra- and interspecific scales, indicating that fish adjust their phenotype to balance nutritional needs against energetic costs. Furthermore, functional explanations for trophic diversification of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes have long focused on jaw structures, but our results indicate that intestinal plasticity in response to diet quality may also be an important mechanism for accommodating trophic shifts during evolutionary radiations.
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
An inverse relationship between intestine length and trophic level has been well documented in birds (e.g. Ricklefs 1996; Battley & Piersma 2005), reptiles and amphibians (e.g. Stevens & Hume 1995; O’Grady et al. 2005), mammals (e.g. Schieck & Millar 1985; Korn 1992) and fishes (e.g. Kapoor, Smith & Verighina 1975; Ribble & Smith 1983; Kramer & Bryant 1995b; German & Horn 2006). This pattern is believed to reflect the greater digestive processing time required by primary consumers due to the lower nutrient content and greater resilience to digestion of plant tissues compared with animal tissues (Horn 1989). Digestive tissues are among the most energetically expensive tissues to maintain (Cant, McBride & Croom 1996; Hume 2005). Therefore, digestive tract length should reflect a balance between maximizing the capacity to extract nutrients and energy from the diet, and minimizing the energetic cost of maintaining digestive tissues (Sibly 1981). Under this trade-off, intestine length should be the minimum necessary for the sufficient uptake of dietary nutrients. However, phylogenetic relationships could also affect intestine characteristics; taxa may exhibit similar morphological traits simply as a result of shared ancestry (Felsenstein 1985; Harvey & Pagel 1991). Thus, resolving the influence of diet on intestine length also requires consideration of phylogeny.
Digestive tissues are notoriously plastic in their responses to dietary change (Starck 1999). Plasticity in gut morphology has been observed in response to fasting, increases in food intake and changes in diet (e.g. Starck 1999; Naya, Karasov & Bozinovic 2007; Olsson et al. 2007). In fluctuating environments, the capacity for phenotypic plasticity can itself be a target of selection (West-Eberhard 2003; Pigliucci 2005; Ghalambor et al. 2007), and patterns consistent with adaptive plasticity in intestine morphology have been demonstrated in rodents (Naya, Bozinovic & Karasov 2008). At the macroevolutionary level, plasticity has important consequences when considering patterns of trait divergence. From one perspective, plasticity could retard evolution by shielding genotypes from selection. Alternatively, plasticity could enable the persistence of populations when exposed to novel environmental stimuli, thereby facilitating new opportunities for selection. In the latter scenario, natural selection could amplify initially small morphological changes initiated by plasticity (West-Eberhard 2003; Crispo 2007). Although the basic ideas underlying this concept are old (Baldwin 1902; Waddington 1942), it has received increasing recent interest, particularly in the context of explaining divergence and adaptive radiation (Losos et al. 2000; West-Eberhard 2003; Gomez-Mestre & Buchholz 2006; Wund et al. 2008), including changes in gut morphology associated with dietary shifts (Ledon-Rettig, Pfennig & Nascone-Yoder 2008). Plasticity in intestine morphology may, therefore, be a key factor influencing the capacity for a lineage to undergo trophic shifts.
East African cichlid fishes offer many classic examples of rapid radiation accompanied by trophic diversification (Fryer & Iles 1972; Liem 1973; Genner, Turner & Hawkins 1999; Ruber, Verheyen & Meyer 1999; Danley & Kocher 2001; Clabaut et al. 2007). Changes in diet are made possible by a suite of morphological changes that accommodate novel ways of capturing and processing food resources. Although changes in jaw morphology have been the primary focus of previous work on dietary shifts in cichlids (e.g. Liem 1973; Meyer 1987; Wimberger 1991), alterations to digestive tract morphology are likely critical for dietary changes and resource differentiation. Previous work has documented an inverse relationship between trophic level and intestine length in Lake Malawi’s ‘mbuna’ cichlids (Reinthal 1989), in Lake Tanganyika’s cichlids (Fryer & Iles 1972) and in Cuatro Cienegas cichlid morphs (Kornfield et al. 1982). Intestine length and coiling pattern have also been proposed as a useful character for phylogenetic reconstruction in several cichlid groups (Zihler 1982; Yamaoka 1985).
Lake Tanganyika’s cichlids are an appealing focal group for studying the phylogenetic and ecological influences on phenotypic traits. Tanganyikan cichlids comprise ∼200 described species (Poll 1986) stemming from within-lake radiations of multiple lineages (Salzburger et al. 2005) during the lake’s long history (9–12 million years; Cohen, Soreghan & Scholz 1993). Ecological divergence during these radiations has yielded numerous trophic strategies that vary both within and among lineages of Tanganyikan cichlids. Thus, interspecific differences in traits associated with feeding, such as intestine length, could be influenced by phylogenetic affinities, current diet and other factors.
Two major obstacles have prevented rigorous combined analysis of dietary and phylogenetic influences on gut length in animal taxa. First, it has been difficult to account for the true complexity of animal diets using categorical characterizations. Previous studies have assigned species to discrete groups (e.g. algivores, invertivores, piscivores) based on temporal snapshots of gut contents, but many species consume multiple types of food either concurrently or in response to changing resource availability (Fryer et al. 1972;McKaye & Marsh 1982). These food types differ substantially in their nutrient and energy content, and hence in their nutritional value to consumers (Bowen, Lutz & Ahlgren 1995; Sterner & Elser 2002). Thus, gut content-based trophic designations may be poor reflections of long-term diet type and quality. Here we use nitrogen isotope ratios to infer each species’ trophic position in the food web. The heavy nitrogen isotope (15N) is differentially retained during waste elimination in animals, resulting in an enrichment in δ15N of 3–4‰ in the consumer’s tissues relative to its prey (Post 2002). This consistent shift in δ15N with each trophic transfer makes δ15N a continuous index of trophic position. Furthermore, nitrogen isotopes reflect assimilation over weeks or months (McIntyre & Flecker 2006), account for feeding at multiple trophic levels, and can be compared among all taxa in the food web (Post 2002). As a continuous metric, isotopic trophic position is also well suited for phylogenetically explicit analytical techniques requiring continuous variables.
The second major obstacle to combined analysis of dietary and phylogenetic influences on intestine length has been the lack of well-resolved phylogenies for relevant groups. Evolutionary relationships within the clades surveyed in previous studies are poorly known, thereby limiting phylogenetic comparisons of gut length patterns to higher taxonomic groups or comparisons between sister taxa (e.g. De Groot 1971; German & Horn 2006). To assess the effect of diet on cichlid intestine length while accounting for shared evolutionary history, we developed a phylogeny for our focal species using mitochondrial DNA sequences, and analysed the relationship between intestine length and trophic position using a phylogenetic generalized least-squares (PGLS) approach (Martins & Hansen 1997; Pagel 1998, 1999).
We also examined the influence of diet on intraspecific variation in intestine length. We quantified differences in intestine length among populations of algivorous Tropheus brichardi (Nelissen & Thys van der Audenaerde 1975) across a natural spatial gradient in algal nitrogen content. Algal nutrient content is an important aspect of diet quality for algivorous tropical fish, whose growth may be limited by nutrient intake rather than energy (Hood, Vanni & Flecker 2005). Given that the widely observed inverse relationship between trophic level and intestine length also represents a gradient of dietary nutrient content (Sterner & Elser 2002), we predicted that fish from sites with low-nutrient algae would have longer intestines than those from sites with high-nutrient algae.
The goals of this study were twofold: to examine the influence of trophic position on intestine length in a broad phylogenetic context and to examine the influence of diet on intraspecific variation in intestine length. The aims of these approaches overlap in that they both seek to test the influence of diet on variation in intestine length. If diet emerges as a strong predictor of intestine length, this would indicate that phenotypes reflect a balance between nutritional needs and energetic demands. Alternatively, if either the interspecific or intraspecific comparisons failed to demonstrate a link between diet and intestine length, then we would infer that evolutionary history or unmeasured variables are responsible for variation in intestine length within this radiation. Intraspecific comparisons are particularly valuable as a complement to our broader interspecific survey because genetic distance is minimized while diet quality varies substantially. By examining effects at both intraspecific and interspecific levels, we can assess whether diet influences patterns of variation at both micro- and macroevolutionary scales.
Material and methods
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
Intestine length, nitrogen isotope and genetic data
We collected specimens of 32 Tanganyikan cichlid species from a rocky shore near Kigoma, Tanzania during August 2002 (Table S1, Supporting Information; Jakobsen’s Beach, Table S3). These species were selected to represent all trophic and phylogenetic groups of rock-dwelling cichlids at this site. Species sampled encompass the five major trophic guilds of Tanganyikan cichlids: algivores, benthic invertivores, zooplanktivores, piscivores and scale-eaters (Table S1). After recording the wet mass of each specimen (n = 3 per species in most cases; Table S1), muscle samples were collected for genetic and stable isotope analysis, the ventral body wall was cut open and specimens were preserved in 10% formalin and stored in ethanol. Intestine length was measured by removing the entire alimentary canal from stored specimens, unwinding the intestine with care to minimize stretching, and measuring the distance from the anus to the posterior end of the stomach using vernier callipers.
Nitrogen (N) stable isotope ratios were determined from dorsal white muscle from each fish analysed for gut length. Muscle was oven-dried at the field laboratory (60 °C, 48 h), stored in glass vials, ground to a fine powder and subsampled (1 mg) for analysis. Stable isotope analyses were conducted using the Cornell Isotope Laboratory using a (Thermo Finningan, San Jose, CA, USA) MAT Delta Plus mass spectrometer calibrated against reference standards (trout tissue, methionine, atmospheric N2). Results were expressed using the standard δ15N notation (see Post 2002), and analytical precision was 0·2‰δ15N (SD). Nitrogen isotope ratios serve as a proxy for consumer trophic position because animals retain relatively more 15N than 14N from their diet. Our analyses use δ15N itself as a continuous index of trophic position; we did not convert δ15N into estimates of trophic level because the exact magnitude of 15N enrichment between consumer and resource remains unresolved (Post 2002; McCutchan et al. 2003).
Following total DNA extraction from tissue samples using DNeasy tissue extraction kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), we PCR-amplified and sequenced two mitochondrial genes from each species: cytochrome b oxidase (cytb, 1149 bp), and nitrogen dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2, 1047 bp). New external and internal primers (Table S2) were designed for cytb amplification and sequencing. External primers 1, 2, 6 and 7 (Kocher et al. 1995) and new internal primers (see Table S2) were used in the amplification and sequencing of ND2. PCR amplification followed standard procedures, and PCR products were prepared for sequencing using BigDye sequencing chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and analysed on an ABI3100 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
To examine the influence of diet quality on intraspecific variation in intestine length, eight T. brichardi were collected from each of six sites in July to August 2003 (Table S2). After recording wet mass, intestines were removed and measured immediately (without preservation). The nutrient content of algae at these sites was assessed using the carbon : nitrogen ratio (C : N, molar) of purified algal samples collected in August 2002 (n = 3–4 per site). Periphyton was scrubbed from the upward surface of a rock, then centrifuged in a colloidal silica column (density ∼1·2 g mL−1) to separate filamentous algae from diatoms, detritus and microinvertebrates (e.g. Hamilton, Sippel & Bunn 2005). Filamentous algae, the main diet of T. brichardi, was collected on precombusted glass fibre filters (Gelman A/E, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), rinsed well, dried and analysed using a Carlo Erba NC2500 elemental analyser (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). We compared fish intestine lengths to algal data collected the previous year because a diet manipulation experiment indicates that Tropheus require months to alter their intestine length in response to dietary change (P. McIntyre & Y. Vadeboncoer, unpublished data).
Because intestine length varies with body size, data must be standardized for size effects before making comparisons among individuals or species (Kramer & Bryant 1995a). The traditional approach to this issue is a simple linear standardization, describing relative gut length as the ratio of intestine length to body length, but this method fails to account for the well-known allometry of gut length (Zihler 1982; Kramer & Bryant 1995a). We assessed allometric patterns among trophic guilds and removed the effects of body size prior to comparing gut lengths among species using a modification of the method developed by Kramer & Bryant (1995b). Allometric growth creates a power function relationship between gut length and body size, and this relationship can be linearized by log10 transformation of both size (wet mass) and intestine length. The intercept of the linearized equation represents the coefficient of the power function, which summarizes the size-independent component of the growth trajectory of gut length. Therefore, when the slope of the linearized equation is equivalent among groups (representing equivalent exponents describing the scaling of gut length with mass), the intercept serves as an index of size-standardized gut length that can be compared among individuals or groups (Fig. S1, Supporting Information).
We used ancova to test for the effects of trophic guild (designations based on gut contents; Hori et al. 1993), log-transformed body mass and guild-mass interactions on log-transformed intestine lengths. The lack of significant differences in slope among trophic guilds (size–guild interaction; F4,83 = 1·83, P = 0·131; Fig. S1) indicates that size-scaling of intestine lengths did not differ among trophic guilds. Two outlier species were excluded from this analysis: Boulengerochromis microlepis (Boulenger 1899) and Cyphotilapia frontosa (Boulenger 1906). Both are considered piscivores (Hori et al. 1993), but this could not be verified because our specimens had empty stomachs. However, the sampled B. microlepis were small individuals (19·2–23·1 g) whose nitrogen isotope values were indicative of invertivory rather than piscivory. Cyphotilapia frontosa (23·9–266·0 g) showed high variability in the mass–gut length relationship, likely due to development of a large nuchal hump as adults.
Given that growth trajectories of gut length with body mass did not differ significantly among trophic guilds, we used the mean of the five guild-specific slopes (0·46; calculated after excluding outlier species) to represent the typical scaling of intestine length (IL) with body mass (M) across our focal species: . We used the mean allometric relationship across guilds rather than a single overall allometric relationship across all individuals because the number of species studied is uneven across guilds and guild representation is uneven across the range of body sizes; both types of heterogeneity would bias the estimated allometric relationship across the entire data set, but not allometry within each guild. The linearized relationship was rearranged to derive an intestine length index (ILI) from measurements of intestine length (IL) and mass (M) for each individual (ILI = log IL − 0·46 log M). Variation in ILI among individual fish reflects their residual deviation from the allometric regression equation, hence we use ILI as a size-standardized index for evaluating patterns of intestine length across species. We used anova to test for differences in ILI among trophic guilds, followed by Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference comparisons.
After editing and aligning sequence data, we used Bayesian phylogenetic methods implemented in Mr.Bayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck et al. 2001; Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) to construct a phylogeny using the complete ND2 and cytb gene sequences for each species (Fig. 1). We ran Mr.Bayes for two runs of 2 million generations each, assessing convergence by monitoring the standard deviation of split frequencies throughout the runs. We discarded 10% of trees to account for burn-in, leaving the posterior distribution of trees with standard deviations of split frequencies below 0·01. To ensure that independent runs had converged upon equivalent posterior distributions, we used the ‘compare’ function in the program AWTY (Nylander et al. 2008) to compare posterior probabilities of clades between runs. We also analysed the data set using parsimony and maximum likelihood (ML; GTR + I + G model estimated in modeltest 3.7; Posada & Crandall 1998) methods implemented in paup* 4.010b (Swofford 2003) to assess the robustness of the topology obtained through Bayesian methods. We used results from the Bayesian analysis in subsequent phylogenetic comparative analyses. As we would expect traits evolving under a Brownian motion model to vary with time and not with the rate of molecular evolution, we ultrametricized all trees used in comparative analyses (without time calibration) using Sanderson’s nonparametric rate-smoothing approach implemented in the function chronogram in the package APE for the R programming environment (Sanderson 1997; Paradis, Claude & Strimmer 2004).
To account for covariation in intestine length among species due to their phylogenetic histories, we used a PGLS approach (Martins & Hansen 1997;Pagel 1998, 1999). We first estimated the parameter λ for intestine length and for trophic position in an ML framework using the program BayesTraits, and used likelihood ratio tests to test for significant difference from 0·0 to 1·0 (Pagel 1999). λ is an estimate of the phylogenetic signal derived through examination of the phylogenetic dependence of the residuals of a linear model. A λ-value of 0·0 indicates that trait variation is independent of the phylogeny, whereas a λ-value of 1·0 indicates that trait variation is as predicted by Brownian motion evolution along the phylogeny (Freckleton, Harvey & Pagel 2002). The λ-value can be applied to PGLS regression as a scaling factor (Pagel 1998, 1999). PGLS uses the variance–covariance matrix of shared branch lengths among species and an expected evolutionary model to transform the error term in the linear model describing the relationship between traits, thereby influencing the model’s slope (Pagel 1998, 1999). We used a joint ML estimate of λ for intestine length and trophic position as the scaling factor in PGLS analyses, and we performed λ estimation and PGLS analyses in an ML framework using the program BayesTraits (Pagel 1998, 1999). We examined the effect of λ-scaling on the PGLS analysis by constraining λ to 1·0 (indicating complete phylogenetic dependence; equivalent to Felsenstein’s independent contrast) and to 0·0 (indicating no effect of phylogeny; equivalent to ordinary least squares regression) as null models. We used likelihood ratio tests to test for significant differences between the ML-estimated value of λ and the two null models (Freckleton, Harvey & Pagel 2002).
For PGLS analyses and the calculation of lambda values we used two approaches. First, we used a consensus topology generated from the posterior distribution of trees in the Bayesian analysis (Fig. 1). As these analyses require completely bifurcating topologies, we randomly resolved polytomies in the consensus tree using the function multi2di from the package APE in the R programming environment (Paradis, Claude & Strimmer 2004), and replaced branches of zero length with very short branches (length 10−6). Second, to examine the effect of topological uncertainly on the analyses, we repeated analyses over 1000 trees from the Bayesian posterior distribution.
To assess the effect of spatial variation in food quality on gut length within T. brichardi, we used ordinary least squares regression to examine the relationship between size-standardized ILI and algal C : N across sites. C : N data were averaged within each site to represent the typical algal nitrogen content experienced by each fish population, whereas individual ILI data were used to incorporate intrapopulational variation into the hypothesis test. We also regressed the site mean ILI against algal C : N to examine the influence of using site mean vs. individual ILI data in the hypothesis test. ILI was calculated by the method outlined earlier, but using the relationship between intestine length and mass observed across all T. brichardi populations in 2003 (ILI = log IL–0·53 log M).
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
Intestine lengths of Lake Tanganyika cichlids Neolamprologue furcifer (Boulenger 1898) varied from 0·43 to 9·34 (Petrochromis sp.‘kazumbe’) times body standard length. δ15N ranged from 2·79 to 9·25, suggesting that our study species spanned roughly three trophic levels (Post 2002). anova indicated that there were significant differences in ILI among trophic guilds (F4,95 = 63·36, P < 0·001). Algivores had the longest intestines (P < 0·001 in all pairwise comparisons), and piscivores had shorter intestines than benthic invertivores or zooplanktivores (P < 0·001) but not scale-eaters.
Bayesian, ML and parsimony analyses of mitochondrial sequence data produced congruent phylogenetic topologies that are consistent with published Lake Tanganyikan cichlid phylogenies (Salzburger et al. 2002, 2005; Clabaut, Salzburger & Meyer 2005). Independent runs of the Bayesian analysis converged upon equivalent posterior distributions of topologies. Results of PGLS analyses using a consensus topology and computed over 1000 trees from the posterior distribution of the Bayesian runs were very similar to those calculated using a consensus tree. All results reported in the text are from the consensus topology, and Table 1 summarizes results from both the consensus tree-based approach and the analyses over the posterior distribution of trees.
|Con||PD||PD 2·5%||PD 97·5%||SD 0||SD 1|
The estimated λ for size-standardized intestine length (ILI) was 0·995, a value significantly greater than 0 (P < 0·0001) but not significantly less than 1 (P = 0·945). In contrast, the λ for trophic position (as δ15N), was 0·596, which is marginally greater than 0·0 (P = 0·091) and significantly less than 1·0 (P < 0·0005). The joint λ estimate for the data set was 0·718, a value significantly greater than 0 (P < 0·006) but not significantly less than 1 (P = 0·066).
In PGLS comparative analysis with ML estimation of λ, the correlation between trophic position and gut length is strong and negative (r2 = 0·509, λ = 0·718; Fig. 2). Without accounting for phylogeny (λ = 0), the correlation is likewise strong and negative (r2 = 0·590), as it is in the case of phylogenetic overcorrection (λ = 1; r2 = 0·404) (Fig. 2 and Fig. S2 for individual data). Likelihood ratio tests indicate that using phylogenetic information improves the regression model (P = 0·006, λ = 0·718; P = 0·039, λ = 1), but there is not a significant difference between the λ-estimated model and the λ = 1 model (P = 0·066). The slopes of all models (λ = 0·718, 1 and 0) are highly significant (P < 0·0001).
Tropheus brichardi showed substantial variation in intestine length among the six study sites; intestine length ranged from 3·13 to 5·70 times body length (mean 4·37). Across sites, there was a significant positive relationship between algal C : N and T. brichardi ILI (F1,46 = 8·55, P < 0·006; y = 0·02x + 0·545; r2 = 0·157). Regression of site mean ILI against algal C : N produced a nearly identical relationship to that of the regression using individual ILI values (F1,4 = 63·47, P < 0·002; y = 0·02x + 0·540; r2 = 0·941). As algal C : N increased (indicating declining nitrogen content), we observed a relative increase in the size-standardized intestine length (Fig. 3).
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
We found a strong negative relationship between trophic level and intestine length across the radiation of Tanganyikan cichlids. Trophic position explained 51% of the total body-size standardized variation in intestine length among species after accounting for phylogeny. This result is consistent with previous studies that have used categorical diet assignments to study this pattern in cichlids (Fryer et al. 1972;Reinthal 1989) and in other fishes (e.g. Kapoor, Smith & Verighina 1975; Ribble & Smith 1983;Kramer & Bryant 1995b;German et al. 2006). Our use of nitrogen isotope data to distill the complexity of tropical fish diets into a single axis of trophic position provides the first quantitative evidence that gut length varies in a continuous fashion as a function of diet. These results suggest that intestine length in cichlids reflects a trade-off between maximizing nutrient and energy absorption and minimizing the energetic demands of digestive tissues.
The nutrient content, energy content and digestibility of food resources all influence the overall quality of an animal’s diet. As these components of food quality are often correlated (e.g. low-nutrient, low-energy, high-fibre plant material vs. high-nutrient, high-energy, easily-digestible animal tissue), their relative influences on intestine length are difficult to separate. Our use of stable isotopes as a proxy for diet focuses on nitrogen that is assimilated, thereby emphasizing dietary material that is digestible. However, there may be considerable variation in the ease of digestion of items that have similar nitrogen isotope ratios. For example, although scale-eaters and piscivores both feed high on the food chain, scales are presumably more difficult to digest than muscle, and scale-eaters may therefore require a longer gut for the extraction of necessary nutrients and energy from their diet. Such differential digestibility of food resources may have contributed to variance in intestine length that was not explained by isotopic trophic position. Indeed, scale-eating fishes appear to have longer intestines than do piscivores of roughly equivalent trophic position (see Fig. 2). Although challenges remain in the full interpretation of stable isotope signatures (Gannes, O’Brian & Martinez Del Rio 1997; McCutchan et al. 2003), they offer a valuable, integrative index of trophic position for studies such as ours (Post 2002).
There were only minor differences in the results of the three PGLS analyses that we performed, i.e. overcorrecting for phylogeny (λ = 1), using an ML-scaled phylogenetic correction (λ = 0·718), and without phylogenetic correction (λ = 0). Trophic position explained 51% of variation in body-size standardized intestine length using the ML-scaled λ-value, and 59% without accounting for phylogeny. Although many authors have interpreted decreases in correlation after phylogenetic correction as the expected outcome when phylogeny has influenced the relationship between the traits in question, accounting for phylogeny should instead be viewed as a statistical correction only, and one that can increase or decrease observed correlations (Rohlf 2006). Conclusions about the relative roles of phylogeny vs. the predictor variable cannot be inferred from these analyses. However, the fact that the correlation between trophic position and intestine length is strong both with and without accounting for phylogeny provides clear evidence for an ecologically rooted correlation between these traits. In addition, significantly non-zero λ-values for intestine length and for the data set indicate that the evolutionary history of these species has played a role in structuring variation in these traits.
Although our ability to resolve patterns of trait evolution using this data set is limited by incomplete sampling of the Tanganyikan cichlid radiation, the observed phylogenetic signal in both trophic position and intestine length is intriguing. In particular, the substantially higher phylogenetic signal shown by intestine length alone (λ = 0·995) compared with trophic position alone (λ = 0·596) suggests that phylogeny predicts patterns of intestine length variation better than it does patterns of variation in trophic position. A number of studies have suggested that phylogenetic signal in ecological traits tends to be less than that of morphological characters, typically attributing these patterns to differences in the lability of these different kinds of traits (e.g. Blomberg, Garland & Ives 2003; Losos 2008). However, the processes underlying differences in phylogenetic signal are varied, complex and difficult to distinguish (Revell, Harmon & Collar 2008). Our detection of phylogenetic signal also speaks to a broader point. Given the rampant ecological divergence and convergent evolution observed within the African cichlid radiations, one might expect traits in this group to show comparatively little phylogenetic signal. Yet our study documents signal in both of the traits we investigated, underscoring the fact that phylogeny cannot be ignored by functional and comparative studies.
Further evidence for a substantial role of diet in determining intestine length is provided by intraspecific spatial variation in the specialized algae-browser T. brichardi. The dramatic differences in intestine length among populations are well correlated with algal nitrogen content, implicating food quality as a key determinant of intestine length. Although differential ingestion of animal material could also give rise to such patterns, T. brichardi is known to be a strict algivore from gut content analyses (designations based on gut contents; Hori et al. 1993), our extensive field observations (P. McIntyre and C. Wagner, unpublished data) and our stable isotope analyses at these and other sites (Fig. 2 and P. McIntyre, unpublished data). To illustrate the magnitude of intraspecific variation observed, we can estimate intestine length for adults (20 g wet mass) based on the ILI–algal C : N relationship (see Fig. 3). Mean intestine lengths at the six sites we studied would range from 42·6 to 49·8 cm, while extrapolation to the full range of algal C : N (18·8–29·4 m) observed across 12 sites in 2002 predicts intestine lengths from 40·3 to 65·7 cm. Although such a broad intraspecific range of variation remains to be demonstrated, substantial intraspecific variation in intestine length is not unexpected in herbivores because plants are highly variable in nutrient content compared with the animal prey of carnivorous species (Sterner et al. 2002). Thus, in Lake Tanganyika we expect that the observed variation in T. brichardi gut length is likely to apply to other algivorous species, but not to carnivores whose animal prey regulate their tissue stoichiometry in a homeostatic fashion.
Two non-exclusive mechanisms could contribute to spatial variation in the intestine length of T. brichardi in response to site-specific food quality: local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. East African cichlid fishes are known for their highly spatially structured populations (e.g. Taylor, Ruber & Verheyen 2001; Sefc et al. 2007; Wagner & McCune 2009), and fine-scale population structure could allow local adaptation to sustained differences in algal nutrient content. However, we consider phenotypic plasticity to be a more likely explanation for two reasons. First, evidence of considerable gene flow within two close relatives of Tropheus in our study region suggests that gene flow is also likely among the populations studied here (Wagner & McCune 2009). Selection would have to be very strong to maintain differences among them in the face of gene flow. Second, intestinal plasticity has been demonstrated experimentally in perch (Olsson et al. 2007), prickleback fish (German et al. 2006) and Tropheus (P. McIntyre and Y. Vadeboncoeur, unpublished data), and observations in Lake Malawi cichlids suggest shortening of the gut in mouthbrooding females that are unable to feed regularly (Reinthal 1989). More generally, plasticity in internal organs in response to environmental stimuli has been documented in many vertebrates (reviewed in Piersma & Lindstrom 1997; Starck 1999), including fasting snakes (Starck & Beese 2002), migrating birds (Karasov et al. 2004) and rodents in fluctuating environments (Naya, Bozinovic & Karasov 2008), and the physiological mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal plasticity are well understood in several taxa (Starck 2003). Thus, we believe that the observed variation in T. brichardi intestine length is a largely plastic response to differences in the nutrient content of their algal diet.
Both our broad phylogenetic survey and our intraspecific comparisons suggest that the intestine length of Tanganyikan cichlids is determined in large part by diet quality. Ecological stoichiometry theory provides a framework for evaluating diet quality based on the degree of imbalance between the demand for a nutrient by a consumer and the nutrient content of its food resources (Sterner et al. 2002). Tropheus brichardi consumes algae that is very low in nitrogen (C : N > 18; Fig. 3) compared with its own body (C : N < 6, n = 4, P. McIntyre, unpublished data). In the light of this imbalance, the inverse relationship between algivore intestine length and algal nitrogen content suggests that longer intestines aid in extracting nutrients from low-quality foods. The overall inverse relationship between trophic position in the food web and gut length among 32 species of Tanganyikan cichlids (Fig. 2) also matches broad predictions from ecological stoichiometry. The nutrient imbalance between fishes and their food resources increases from piscivores (no imbalance) to invertivores (moderate imbalance) to algivores (extreme imbalance), and we found that cichlid intestine lengths increase in the same order.
The inverse relationship between intestine length and diet quality matches expectations from the general trade-off between maximizing the extraction of nutrients and energy from the diet and minimizing the maintenance costs of digestive tissues. The presence of parallel patterns both among and within species highlights the functional significance of intestine length. However, the magnitude of intraspecific variation is small compared to that observed in the phylogenetic comparison. The observed range of ILI across species yields a prediction of 11-fold variation in intestine length for a 20 g fish (5·18 cm in piscivores; 56·6 cm in algivores). This is seven times the observed range of variation among T. brichardi population means (42·6–49·8 cm for a 20 g fish). For the 10 species of algivores included in this study, the observed range of ILI across species yields a predicted range of 29·6–56·6 cm in intestine length for a 20 g fish, nearly four times the observed range of T. brichardi variation. Thus, for both algivorous species only and for the entire trophic range, variation in intestine length among species is far greater than that observed among populations of T. brichardi.
Although diet predicts the observed patterns in intestine length at both inter- and intraspecific levels, considerable variation in this relationship remains unexplained. In addition to measurement error in both traits, unexplained variation could arise from the diversity of other intestinal features that influence the efficiency of digestion and assimilation. For instance, surface area, volume, villus area and other features are known to affect intestinal function (e.g. Ricklefs 1996; Lavin et al. 2008), and we did not evaluate these aspects of intestinal phenotype. Regardless of its source, the magnitude of the observed variation, and the correlation of this variation with diet, suggest that both plasticity and natural selection have influenced intestine length, although work examining the limits of plasticity in intestine length has not been conducted in any taxon (Starck 1999).
Plasticity is not only an intriguing proximate mechanism for the observed morphological response to differences in diet quality within species, but may also be an important mechanism for accommodating trophic shifts during diversification. The capacity to respond plastically to novel food sources could allow initial divergence in trophic morphology, thereby creating an opportunity for selection to further extend the phenotypic response (e.g. West-Eberhard 2003; Ledon-Rettig, Pfennig & Nascone-Yoder 2008; Wund et al. 2008). The role of plasticity in the evolution of mouth morphology, a trait frequently associated with trophic shifts, has been discussed repeatedly in cichlids (e.g. Meyer 1987; Wimberger 1991; Stauffer & Gray 2004). However, changes in diet require a broad suite of morphological changes to fully accommodate the use of novel food resources. The strong relationship between diet and intestine length observed among taxa in this and previous studies indicates that changes in intestine morphology are necessary in order for individuals to successfully undergo dietary shifts. Thus, intestinal plasticity could provide a mechanism for accommodating dietary differentiation over ecological time scales, thereby potentially facilitating diversification, and enabling the remarkable convergence in morphology associated with parallel trophic shifts among East African cichlid fishes.
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
We owe many thanks to Marc Lajeunesse, Irby Lovette, Amy McCune, Dan Rabosky, the Lovette and McCune laboratory groups, and the University of Michigan fish group for advice and consultation. George Kazumbe provided essential help with fish collection, and the Tanzanian Fisheries Research Institute and the Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates provided logistical support. Fish were collected with permits and permission from the University of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, and with the approval of the Cornell University IACUC (#02-67). We also thank Art Kasson and the Cornell Isotope Laboratory for isotope analyses, and the Fuller Lab of Evolutionary Biology for molecular genetic resources. We are grateful to Peter Wainwright and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on the manuscript, to Ad Konings for fish photographs and to Chris Venditti for advice on using BayesTraits. Funding was provided by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and grant INT-0321471 to P.B.M., Cornell University Mellon Fund and SSB Research Award grants to C.E.W., and NSF grants ATM-0223920 and DBI-0353765 to The Nyanza Project provided logistical support.
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
- 1902) Development and Evolution. MacMillan Co., London. (
- 2005) Adaptive interplay between feeding and ecology and features of the digestive tract in birds. Physiological and Ecological Adaptations to Feeding in Vertebrates (eds J. M.Starck & T.Wang), pp. 201–228, Science Publishers Inc., Enfield. & (
- 2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717–745. , & (
- 1899) Second contribution to the ichthyology of Lake Tanganyika. – On the fishes obtained by the Congo Free State Expedition under Lieut. Lemaire in 1898. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 15, 87–96. (
- 1898) Report on the fishes obtained by Mr. J. E. S. Moore in Lake Tanganyika. Proceedings of the General Meetings for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London 1898, pp. 494–497. (
- 1906) Fourth contribution to the ichthyology of Lake Tanganyika. — Report on the collection of fishes made by Dr. W. A. Cunnington during the Third Tanganyika Expedition, 1904– 1905. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 17, 537–619. (
- 1995) Dietary-protein and energy as determinants of food quality: trophic strategies compared. Ecology, 76, 899–907. , & (
- 1996) The regulation of intestinal metabolism and its impact on whole animal energetics. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2541–2553. , & (
- 2005) Comparative phylogenetic analyses of the adaptive radiation of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish: nuclear sequences are less homoplasious but also less informative than mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 61, 666–681. , & (
- 2007) Geometric morphometric analyses provide evidence for the adaptive character of the Tanganyikan cichlid fish radiations. Evolution, 61, 560–578. , , & (
- 1993) Estimating the age of ancient lake basins: an example from Lake Tanganyika. Geology, 21, 511–514. , & (
- 2007) The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: revisiting two mechanisms of evolutionary change mediated by phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 61, 2469–2479. (
- 2001) Speciation in rapidly diverging systems: lessons from Lake Malawi. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1075–1086. & (
- 1971) On the interrelationship between morphology of the alimentary tract, food and feeding behaviour in flatfishes (Pisces: Pleuronectiformes). Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 5, 121–196. (
- 1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125, 1–15. (
- 2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. The American Naturalist, 160, 712–726. , & (
- 1972) The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa: Their Biology and Evolution. Tropical Fish Hobbyist Publications Inc., Edinburgh. & (
- 1997) Stable isotopes in animal ecology: assumptions, caveats, and a call for more laboratory experiments. Ecology, 78, 1271–1276. , & (
- 1999) Foraging of rocky habitat cichlid fishes in Lake Malawi: coexistence through niche partitioning? Oecologia, 121, 283–292. , & (
- 2006) Gut length and mass in herbivorous and carnivorous prickleback fishes (Teleostei: Stichaeidae): ontogenetic, dietary, and phylogenetic effects. Marine Biology, 148, 1123–1134. & (
- 2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Functional Ecology, 21, 394–407. , , & (
- 2006) Developmental plasticity mirrors differences among taxa in spadefoot toads linking plasticity and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 19021–19026. & (
- 2005) Separation of algae from detritus for stable isotope or ecological stoichiometry studies using density fractionation in colloidal silica. Limnology and Oceanography Methods, 3, 149–157. , & (
- 1991) Phylogenies and the Comparative Method. Oxford University Press, Oxford. & (
- 2005) Nutrient recycling by two phosphorus-rich grazing catfish: the potential for phosphorus-limitation of fish growth. Oecologia, 146, 247–257. , & (
- 1993) Littoral fish communities in Lake Tanganyika: irreplaceable diversity supported by intricate interactions among species. Conservation Biology, 7, 657–666. , , & (
- 1989) Biology of marine herbivorous fishes. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 27, 167–272. (
- 2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294, 2310–2314. , , & (
- 2005) Concepts of digestive efficiency. Physiological and ecological adaptations to feeding in vertabrates (eds J. M.Starck & T.Wang), pp. 43–58. Science Publishers, Enfield. (
- 1975) The alimentary canal and digestion in teleosts. Advances in Marine Biology, 13, 109–239. , & (
- 2004) Anatomical and histological changes in the alimentary tract of migrating blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla): a comparison among fed, fasted, food-restricted, and refed birds. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 77, 149–160. , , & (
- 1995) Evolution of NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 in east African cichlid fish. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 4, 420–432. , , , & (
- 1992) Intestine lengths of Southern Africa savanna rodents and insectivores: intra- and interspecific comparisons. Journal of Zoology, 228, 455–460. (
- 1982) The cichlid fish of Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico: direct evidence of conspecificity among distinct trophic morphs. Evolution, 36, 658–664. , , & (
- 1995a) Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical stream: 1. Ontogenetic allometry. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 42, 115–127. & (
- 1995b) Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical stream: 2. Relationships to diet – the long and short of a convoluted tissue. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 42, 129–141. & (
- 2008) Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 81, 526–550. , , , & (
- 2008) Ancestral variation and the potential for genetic accommodation in larval amphibians: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Evolution and Development, 10, 316–325. , & (
- 1973) Evolutionary strategies and morphological innovations: cichlid pharyngeal jaws. Systematic Zoology, 22, 425–441. (
- 2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters, 11, 995–1007. (
- 2000) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution, 54, 301–305. , , , , , , , & (
- 1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. The American Naturalist, 149, 646–667. & (
- 2003) Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope rations of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur. Oikos, 102, 378–390. , , & (
- 2006) Rapid turnover of tissue nitrogen of primary consumers in tropical freshwaters. Oecologia, 148, 12–21. & (
- 1982) Food switching by two specialized algae-scraping cichlid fishes in Lake Malawi, Africa. Oecologia, 56, 245–248. & (
- 1987) Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution, 41, 1357–1369. (
- 2008) Latitudinal trends in digestive flexibility: testing the climatic variability hypothesis with data on the intestinal length of rodents. The American Naturalist, 172, E122–E134. , & (
- 2007) Phenotypic plasticity in laboratory mice and rats: meta-analysis of current ideas on gut size flexibility. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9, 1363–1374. , & (
- 1975) Description of Tropheus Brichardi sp. nov. from Lake Tanganyika (Pisces, Cichlidae). Revue de Zoologique Africaine, 89, 974–980. & (
- 2008) AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics, 24, 581–583. , , & (
- 2005) Correlating diet and digestive tract specialization: examples from the lizard family Liolaemidae. Zoology, 108, 201–210. , , & (
- 2007) Gut length plasticity in perch: into the bowels of resource polymorphisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90, 517–523. , , & (
- 1998) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta, 26, 331–348. (
- 1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401, 877–884. (
- 2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20, 289–290. , & (
- 1997) Rapid reversible changes in organ size as a component of adaptive behavior. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 134–138. & (
- 2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 481–486. (
- 1986) Resultats scientifiques de l’exploration hydrobiologiques du lac Tanganyika (1946–1947). Poissons Cichlidae. Institut Royale des sciences naturelles de Belgique, Rapport Scientifique. (
- 1998) modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817–818. & (
- 2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, method and assumptions. Ecology, 83, 703–718. (
- 1989) The gross intestine morphology of a group of rock-dwelling cichlid fishes (Pisces, Teleostei) from Lake Malawi. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 39, 208–225. (
- 2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Systematic Biology, 57, 591–601. , & (
- 1983) Relative intestine length and feeding ecology of freshwater fishes. Growth, 47, 292–300. & (
- 1996) Morphometry of the digestive tracts of some Passerine birds. The Condor, 98, 279–292. (
- 2006) A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution, 60, 1509–1515. (
- 2003) mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574. & (
- 1999) Replicated evolution of trophic specializations in an endemic cichlid fish lineage from Lake Tanganyika. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 10230–10235. , & (
- 2002) Phylogeny of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid species flock and its relationship to the central and east African Haplochromine cichlid fish faunas. Systematic Biology, 51, 113–135. , , , & (
- 2005) Out of Tanganyika: genesis, explosive speciation, key-innovations and phylogeography of the haplochromine cichlid fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 5, 17. , , & (
- 1997) A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 1218–1231. (
- 1985) Alimentary tract measurements as indicators of diets of small mammal. Mammalia, 49, 93–104. & (
- 2007) Species-specific population structure in rock-specialized sympatric cichlid species in Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 64, 33–49. , , & (
- 1981) Strategies of digestion and defecation. Physiological Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach to Resource Use (eds C. R.Townsend & P.Calow), pp. 109–139, Blackwell, Oxford. (
- 1999) Structural flexibility of the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates: implications for evolutionary morphology. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 238, 87–101. (
- 2003) Shaping up: how vertebrates adjust their digestive system to changing environmental conditions. Animal Biology, 53, 245–257. (
- 2002) Structural flexibility of the small intestine and liver of garter snakes in response to feeding and fasting. Journal of Experimental Biology, 305, 1377–1388. & (
- 2004) Phenotypic plasticity: its role in trophic radiation and explosive speciation in cichlids (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Animal Biology, 54, 137–158. & (
- 2002) Ecological Stoichiometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton. & (
- 1995) Comparative Physiology of the Vertebrate Digestive System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. & (
- 2003) Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. (
- 2001) Microsatellites reveal high levels of population substructuring in the species-poor Eretmodine cichlid lineage from Lake Tanganyika. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 268, 803–808. , & (
- 1942) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150, 563–565. (
- 2009) Contrasting patterns of spatial genetic structure in sympatric rock-dwelling cichlid fishes. Evolution, in press. & (
- 2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (
- 1991) Plasticity of jaw and skull morphology in the neotropical cichlids Geophagus brasilliensis and G. stradochneri. Evolution, 45, 1545–1563. (
- 2008) A test of the “flexible stem” model of evolution: ancestral plasticity, genetic accommodation, and morphological divergence in the threespine stickleback radiation. The American Naturalist, 172, 449–462. , , , & (
- 1985) Intestinal coiling pattern in the epilithic algal-feeding cichlids (Pieces, Teleostei) of Lake Tanganyika, and its phylogenetic significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 235–261. (
- 1982) Gross morphology and configuration of digestive tracts of Cichlidae (Teleostei, Perciformes): phylogenetic and functional significance. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 32, 544–571. (
- Top of page
- Material and methods
- Supporting Information
Fig. S1. The relationship between intestine length and body mass among sampled Tanganyikan cichlid species.
Fig. S2. Mean size-corrected intestine length (ILI) and trophic position in the food web (based on mean δ15N) for each individual in the data set of Lake Tanganyikan cichlids.
Table S1. Specimen information, intestine length and mass data, and GenBank accession numbers.
Table S2. Primers for amplification and sequencing of the complete cytochrome b and for internal sequencing of ND2.
Table S3. Latitude and longitude for six sampling sites near Kigoma, Tanzania, where Tropheus brichardi and algal nutrient content data were collected.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
|FEC_1589_sm_FigS1.pdf||269K||Supporting info item|
|FEC_1589_sm_FigS2.pdf||226K||Supporting info item|
|FEC_1589_sm_TableS1.pdf||134K||Supporting info item|
|FEC_1589_sm_TableS2.pdf||51K||Supporting info item|
|FEC_1589_sm_TableS3.pdf||61K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.