SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, P.A. (1982) Functional responses of optimal foragers. American Naturalist, 120, 382390.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1983b) Alternative forms for links in trophic webs. Current Trends in Food Web Theory (eds D.L.DeAngelis, W.M.Post & G.Sugihara), pp. 9194. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Technical Report 5983.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. American Naturalist, 124, 8096.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1986) Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theoretical Population Biology, 29, 107160.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1987a) The nonlinearity of competitive effects in models of competition for essential resources. Theoretical Population Biology, 32, 5065.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1987b) The functional responses of adaptive consumers of two resources. Theoretical Population Biology, 32, 262288.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1987c) Indirect interactions between species that share a predator: varieties of indirect effects. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities (eds W.C.Kerfoot & A.Sih), pp. 3858. University Press of New England, Dartmouth, NH.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1989) Decreasing functional responses as a result of adaptive consumer behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology, 3, 95114.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1990) Mixed responses to resource densities and their implications for character displacement. Evolutionary Ecology, 4, 93102.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1991a) Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology, 72, 12421252.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1991b) Strengths of indirect effects generated by optimal foraging. Oikos, 62, 167176.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1992a) Adaptive foraging by predators as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 5672.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1992b) Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: Unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptations. American Naturalist, 140, 573600.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1992c) Why don’t predators have positive effects on prey populations? Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 449457.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1993) Why predation rates should not be proportional to predator density. Ecology, 74, 726733.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1995) Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. American Naturalist, 146, 112134.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1997) Evolutionary responses of foraging-related traits in unstable predator-prey systems. Evolutionary Ecology, 11, 673686.
  • Abrams, P.A. (1999) The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. American Naturalist, 153, 8397.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2000) The impact of habitat selection on the heterogeneity of resources in varying environments. Ecology, 81, 29022913.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2002) Will declining population sizes warn us of impending extinctions? American Naturalist, 160, 293305.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2003) Can adaptive evolution or behaviour lead to diversification of traits determining a trade-off between foraging gain and predation risk? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 653670.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2004) Trait initiated indirect effects in simple food webs: consequences of changes in consumption-related traits. Ecology, 85, 10291038.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2005) The consequences of predator and prey adaptations for top-down and bottom-up effects. Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions (eds P.Barbosa & I.Castellanos), pp. 279297. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2006a) The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence. American Naturalist, 167, 329342.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2006b) The effects of switching behaviour on the evolutionary diversification of generalist consumers. American Naturalist, 168, 645659.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2007) Habitat choice in predator-prey systems; spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements. American Naturalist, 169, 581594.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2008a) Measuring the population-level consequences of predator-induced prey movement. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 333350.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2008b) Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions. Ecology, 89, 16401649.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2009) When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect Ecology Letters, 12, 462474.
  • Abrams, P.A., Cressman, R. & Křivan, V. (2007) The role of behavioural dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. American Naturalist, 169, 505518.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (1993) Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behaviour in a two prey-one predator system. Evolutionary Ecology, 7, 312326.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (1996) Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology, 77, 610616.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (1997) Prey evolution as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evolution, 51, 17401748.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (2003) Population dynamical consequences of switching at low total prey densities. Population Ecology, 45, 175185.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (2004) Consequences of behavioural dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching. Population Ecology, 46, 1325.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (2005) The effect of adaptive change in the prey on the dynamics of an exploited predator population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science., 62, 758766.
  • Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. & Harada, Y. (1993) Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima in the evolution of continuous traits. Evolutionary Ecology, 7, 465487.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Shen, L. (1989) Population dynamics of systems with consumers that maintain a constant ratio of intake rates of two resources. Theoretical Population Biology, 35, 5189.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Vos, M. (2003) Adaptation, density dependence, and the abundances of trophic levels. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 11131132.
  • Alonzo, S.H. (2002) State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioural interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evolutionary Ecology, 4, 759778.
  • Amarasekare, P. (2007) Spatial dynamics of communities with intraguild predation: the role of dispersal strategies. American Naturalist, 170, 819831.
  • Armsworth, P.R. & Roughgarden, J.E. (2005) The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. American Naturalist, 165, 449465.
  • Van Baalen, M., Křivan, V., Van Rijn, P.C.J. & Sabelis, M.W. (2001) Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems. American Naturalist, 157, 512524.
  • Beckerman, A.P. (2005) The shape of things eaten; the functional response of herbivores foraging adaptively. Oikos, 110, 591601.
  • Beckerman, A.P., Petchey, O.L. & Warren, P.H. (2006) Foraging biology predicts food web complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 103, 1374513749.
  • Bednikoff, P.A. (2006) Foraging in the face of danger. Foraging: Behaviour and Ecology (eds D.W.Stephens, J.S.Brown & R.C.Ydenberg), pp. 305330. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Bernstein, C., Auger, P. & Poggiale, J.-C. (1999) Predator migration decisions, the ideal free distribution, and predator-prey dynamics. American Naturalist, 153, 267281.
  • Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Křivan, V. & Schmitz, O. (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated effects. Ecology, 84, 11011114.
  • Bolnick, D.I. & Preisser, E.L. (2005) Resource competition modifies the strength of trait-mediated predator-prey interaction: A meta-analysis. Ecology, 86, 27712779.
  • Brown, J.S., Laundre, J.W. & Gurung, M. (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and predator-prey interactions. Journal of Mammalogy, 80, 385399.
  • Carnicer, J., Abrams, P.A. & Jordano, P. (2008) Switching behaviour, coexistence and diversification in a Mediterranean bird community: theoretical predictions and empirical evidence. Ecology Letters, 11, 802808.
  • Case, T.J. (2001) An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  • Charnov, E.L. (1976) Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129136.
  • Charnov, E.L., Orians, G.H. & Hyatt, K. (1976) Ecological implications of resource depletion. American Naturalist, 110, 247259.
  • Comins, H. & Hassell, M.P. (1979) The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 335351.
  • De Roos, A.M., Tl Schellekens, T., Van Kooten, T. & Persson, L. (2008) Stage-specific predator species help each other to persist while competing for a single prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (SA), 105, 1393013935.
  • Egas, M., Dieckmann, U. & Sabelis, M.W. (2004) Evolution restricts the coexistence of specialists and generalists: the role of trade-off structure. American Naturalist, 163, 518531.
  • Fryxell, J.M. & Lundberg, P. (1994) Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 407421.
  • Fryxell, J.M. & Lundberg, P. (1998) Individual Behaviour and Community Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Gleeson, S.K. & Wilson, D.S. (1986) Equilibrium diet—optimal foraging and prey coexistence. Oikos, 46, 139144.
  • Gurney, W.S.C. & Nisbet, R. (1998) Ecological Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Heithaus, M.R. (2001) Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos, 92, 542554.
  • Heithaus, M.R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A.J. & Worm, B. (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 202210.
  • Holling, C.S. (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 45, 160.
  • Holt, R.D. (1977) Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 12, 197229.
  • Holt, R.D. & Kotler, B.P. (1987) Short-term apparent competition. American Naturalist, 130, 412430.
  • Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D. (eds) (2005) Metacommunities; Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Ives, A.R. & Dobson, A.P. (1987) Antipredator behaviour and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. American Naturalist, 130, 431447.
  • Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. (2004) Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biological Reviews, 79, 337349.
  • Kondoh, M. (2003) Foraging adaptation and the relationship between Food-web complexity and stability. Science, 299, 13881391.
  • Kot, M. (2001) Elements of Mathematical Ecology. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.
  • Křivan, V. (1997) Dynamic ideal-free distribution: Effects of optimal patch choice on predator-prey dynamics. American Naturalist, 149, 164178.
  • Křivan, V. (2007) The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging – predation risk trade-offs. American Naturalist, 170, 771782.
  • Křivan, V. & Eisner, J. (2006) The effect of the Holling type II functional response on apparent competition. Theoretical Population Biology, 70, 421430.
  • Leibold, M.A., Chase, J.M., Shurin, J.B. & Downing, A.L. (1997) Species turnover and the regulation of trophic structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 467494.
  • Leon, J.A. & Tumpson, D. (1975) Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 50, 185201.
  • Levins, R. (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15, 237240.
  • Lima, S.L. & Dill, L. (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619640.
  • Luttbeg, B., Rowe, L. & Mangel, M. (2003) Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects. Ecology, 84, 11401150.
  • Ma, B.O., Abrams, P.A. & Brassil, C.E. (2003) Dynamic vs. instantaneous models of diet choice. American Naturalist, 162, 668684.
  • MacArthur, R.H. & Pianka, E.R. (1966) On the optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100, 603609.
  • Matsuda, H. & Abrams, P.A. (1994) Timid consumers: Self-extinction due to adaptive change in foraging and anti-predator effort. Theoretical Population Biology, 45, 7691.
  • Matsuda, H., Abrams, P.A. & Hori, M. (1993) The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators. Oikos, 68, 549559.
  • Matsuda, H., Hori, M. & Abrams, P.A. (1994) Effects of predator-specific defense on community complexity. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 628638.
  • Matsuda, H., Hori, M. & Abrams, P.A. (1996) Effects of predator-specific defense on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities. Evolutionary Ecology, 10, 1328.
  • Matsuda, H. & Namba, T. (1989) Coevolutionarily stable community structure in a patchy environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 136, 229243.
  • Matsuda, H. & Namba, T. (1991) Food web graph of a coevolutionarily stable community. Ecology, 72, 267276.
  • McCann, K.S., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G.R. (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794798.
  • Murdoch, W.W. (1969) Switching in general Predators: experiments on prey specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecological Monographs, 39, 335354.
  • Murdoch, W.W. & Oaten, A. (1975) Predation and population stability. Advances in Ecological Research, 9, 1131.
  • Oaten, A. & Murdoch, W.W. (1975) Switching, functional response, and stability in predator-prey systems. American Naturalist, 109, 299318.
  • Peacor, S.D. & Werner, E.E. (1997) Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology, 78, 11461156.
  • Petchey, O.L., Beckerman, A.P., Riede, J.O. & Warren, P.H. (2008) Size, foraging and food web structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 105, 41914196.
  • Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I. & Benard, M. (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption on predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 86, 501509.
  • Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G. & Moore, J.C. (2006) Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature, 442, 265269.
  • Roughgarden, J. & Feldman, M. (1975) Species packing and predation pressure. Ecology, 56, 489492.
  • Ruel, J.J. & Ayres, M.P. (1999) Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 361366.
  • Schoener, T.W. (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2, 369404.
  • Schoener, T.W. (1993) On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities. Mutualism and Community Organization: Behavioural, Theoretical, and Food-web Approaches (eds H.Kawanabe, J.E.Cohen & K.Iwasaki), pp. 365411. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Schwinning, S. & Rosenzweig, M.L. (1990) Periodic oscillations in an ideal-free predator-prey distribution. Oikos, 59, 8591.
  • Sih, A. (1984) The behavioural response race between predator and prey. American Naturalist, 123, 143150.
  • Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. & Strohmeier, K. (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: A review of field experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 269312.
  • Skalski, G.T. & Gilliam, J.F. (2001) Functional responses with predator interference: Viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology, 82, 30833092.
  • Soluk, D.A. (1993) Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology, 74, 219225.
  • Soluk, D.A. & Collins, N.C. (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos, 52, 94100.
  • Soluk, D.A. & Richardson, J.S. (1997) The role of stoneflies in enhancing growth of trout: a test of the importance of predator–predator facilitation within a stream community. Oikos, 80, 214219.
  • Van Der Staap, I., Vos, M., Verschoor, A.M., Helmsing, N.R. & Mooij, W.M. (2007) Induced defenses in herbivores and plants differentially modulate a trophic cascade. Ecology, 88, 24742481.
  • Stamps, J.A. (2001) Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. Dispersal (eds J.Clobert, E.Danchin, A.A.Dhondt & J.D.Nichols), pp. 230242. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Stephens, D.W. & Kerbs, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Sterner, R.W. & Elser, J.J. (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements From Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Uchida, S., Drossel, B. & Brose, U. (2007) The structure of food webs with adaptive behaviour. Ecological Modelling, 206, 263276.
  • Vandermeer, J. (1980) Indirect mutualism: variations on a theme by Stephen Levine. American Naturalist, 116, 441448.
  • Werner, E.E. & Anholt, B.R. (1993) Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. American Naturalist, 142, 2442272.
  • Werner, E.E. & Peacor, S.D. (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84, 10831100.
  • Wilson, D.S. & Yoshimura, J. (1994) On the coexistence of generalists and specialists. American Naturalist, 144, 692707.
  • Yamauchi, A. & Yamamura, N. (2005) Effects of defense evolution and diet choice on population dynamics in a one-predator-two-prey system. Ecology, 86, 25132524.
  • Yoshida, T., Jones, L.E., Ellner, S.P., Fussman, G.F. & Hairston, N.G. (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature, 424, 303306.