SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barber, J.R., Crooks, K.R. & Fristrup, K.M. (2009) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 180189.
  • Bee, M.A. & Micheyl, C. (2008) The cocktail party problem: What is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviourists study it Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 235251.
  • Bee, M.A. & Swanson, E.M. (2007) Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise. Animal Behaviour, 74, 17651776.
  • Bernays, E.A. & Funk, D.J. (1999) Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 266, 151156.
  • Blumenrath, S.H., Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S.B. (2004) Being inside nest boxes: does it complicate the receiving conditions for great tit Parus major females? Bioacoustics-the International Journal of Animal Sound and Its Recording, 14, 209223.
  • Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (1998) Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Brumm, H., Robertson, K.A. & Nemeth, E. (2011) Singing direction as a tool to investigate the function of birdsong: an experiment on sedge warblers. Animal Behaviour, 81, 653659.
  • Brumm, H. & Slabbekoorn, H. (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 35, 151209.
  • Brumm, H. & Slater, P.J.B. (2006) Animals can vary signal amplitude with receiver distance: evidence from zebra finch song. Animal Behaviour, 72, 699705.
  • Brumm, H., Voss, K., Kollmer, I. & Todt, D. (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207, 443448.
  • Chan, A.A.Y.-H. & Blumstein, D.T. (2011a) Attention, noise, and implications for wildlife conservation and management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 131, 17.
  • Chan, A.A.Y.-H., Giraldo-Perez, P., Smith, S. & Blumstein, D.T. (2011b) Anthropogenic noise affects risk assessment and attention: the distracted prey hypothesis. Biology Letters, 6, 458461.
  • Codarin, A., Wysocki, L.E., Ladich, F. & Picciulin, M. (2009) Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58, 18801887.
  • Driver, J. & Spence, C. (1998) Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 254262.
  • Endler, J.A. (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist, 139, S125S153.
  • Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. (2009) Cumulative consequences of noise pollution: noise changes avian communities and species interactions. Current Biology, 19, 14151419.
  • Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. (2011) Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 278, 20252031.
  • Franco, P. & Slabbekoorn, H. (2009) Repertoire size and composition in great tits: a flexibility test using playbacks. Animal Behaviour, 77, 261269.
  • Gorissen, L. & Eens, M. (2004) Interactive communication between male and female Great Tits (Parus major) during the dawn chorus. Auk, 121, 184191.
  • Gross, K., Pasinelli, G. & Kunc, H.P. (2010) Behavioural plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment. American Naturalist, 176, 456464.
  • Habib, L., Bayne, E.M. & Boutin, S. (2007) Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 176184.
  • Halfwerk, W. & Slabbekoorn, H. (2009) A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Animal Behaviour, 78, 13011307.
  • Halfwerk, W., Bot, S., Buikx, J., Van Der Velde, M., Komdeur, J., Ten Cate, C. & Slabbekoorn, H. (2011a) Low songs lose potency in urban noise conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1454914554.
  • Halfwerk, W., Holleman, L.J.M., Lessells, C.M. & Slabbekoorn, H. (2011b) Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 210219.
  • Hall, M.L. (2009) A review of vocal duetting in birds. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 40, 67121.
  • Helm, B., Piersma, T. & Van Der Jeugd, H. (2006) Sociable schedules: interplay between avian seasonal and social behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 72, 245262.
  • Johnstone, R.A. (2011) Load lightening and negotiation over offspring care in cooperative breeders. Behavioural Ecology, 22, 436444.
  • King, A.P., West, M.J. & Goldstein, M.H. (2005) Non-vocal shaping of avian song development: parallels to human speech development. Ethology, 111, 101117.
  • Kluyver, H.N. (1951) The population ecology of the great tit, Parus major L. Ardea, 39, 1135.
  • Krebs, J., Ashcroft, R. & Webber, M. (1978) Song repertories and territory defence in great tit. Nature, 271, 539542.
  • Lachlan, R.F. (2007) Luscinia: a bioacoustics analysis computer program. Version 1.0 [Computer program]. Retrieved from www.lusciniasound.org 30 June 2007.
  • Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A.A. (1986) Male quality, reproduction, and survival in the great tit (Parus major). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 19, 5763.
  • Langemann, U., Gauger, B. & Klump, G.M. (1998) Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise. Animal Behaviour, 56, 763769.
  • Lengagne, T. (2008) Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biological Conservation, 141, 20232031.
  • Lombard, E. (1911) Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Annales des maladies de l'oreille, du larynx du nez et du pharynx, 37, 101119.
  • Mace, R. (1987) The dawn chorus in the great tit parus-major is directly related to female fertility. Nature, 330, 745746.
  • Manabe, K., Sadr, E.I. & Dooling, R.J. (1998) Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 11901198.
  • Mathevon, N., Aubin, T. & Dabelsteen, T. (1996) Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology, 102, 397412.
  • Moller, A.P., Nielsen, J.T. & Garamszegi, L.Z. (2006) Song post exposure, song features, and predation risk. Behavioural Ecology, 17, 155163.
  • Naguib, M., Schmidt, R., Sprau, P., Roth, T., Florcke, C. & Amrhein, V. (2008) The ecology of vocal signaling: male spacing and communication distance of different song traits in nightingales. Behavioural Ecology, 19, 10341040.
  • Naguib, M., Kunc, H.P., Sprau, P., Roth, T. & Amrhein, V. (2011) Communication networks and spatial ecology in Nightingales. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, Vol 43 (eds H.J. Brockmann, T.J. Roper, M. Naguib, J.C. Mitani & L.W. Simmons), pp. 239271. Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, CA.
  • Parks, S.E., Johnson, M., Nowacek, D. & Tyack, P.L. (2011) Individual right whales call louder in increased environmental noise. Biology Letters, 7, 3335.
  • Pick, H.L., Siegel, G.M., Fox, P.W., Garber, S.R. & Kearney, J.K. (1989) inhibiting the lombard effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 894900.
  • Pohl, N.U., Leadbeater, E., Slabbekoorn, H., Klump, G.M. & Langemann, U. (2012) Great tits in urban noise benefit from high frequencies in song detection and discrimination. Animal Behaviour, 83, 711721.
  • Potash, L.M. (1972) Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychonomic Science, 26, 252254.
  • Potvin, D.A., Parris, K.M. & Mulder, R.A. (2011) Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 24642469.
  • Quinn, J.L., Whittingham, M.J., Butler, S.J. & Cresswell, W. (2006) Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology, 37, 601608.
  • Rivera-Gutierrez, H.F., Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. (2010) Multiple signals for multiple messages: great tit, Parus major, song signals age and survival. Animal Behaviour, 80, 451459.
  • Seehausen, O., Vanalphen, J.J.M. & Witte, F. (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science, 277, 18081811.
  • Slabbekoorn, H. (2004) Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. Nature's music: The Science of Birdsong (eds P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn), pp. 178205. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, USA.
  • Slabbekoorn, H. & Peet, M. (2003) Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267267.
  • Slabbekoorn, H. & Ripmeester, E.A.P. (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology, 17, 7283.
  • Slabbekoorn, H., Bouton, N., Van Opzeeland, I., Coers, A., Ten Cate, C. & Popper, A.N. (2010) A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 419427.
  • Smith, T.B., Mila, B., Grether, G.F., Slabbekoorn, H., Sepil, I., Buermann, W., Saatchi, S. & Pollinger, J.P. (2008) Evolutionary consequences of human disturbance in a rainforest bird species from Central Africa. Molecular Ecology, 17, 5871.
  • Swaddle, J.P. & Page, L.C. (2007) High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution. Animal Behaviour, 74, 363368.
  • Van Der Sluijs, I., Gray, S.M., Amorim, M.C.P., Barber, I., Candolin, U., Hendry, A.P., Krahe, R., Maan, M.E., Utne-Palm, A.C., Wagner, H.J. & Wong, B.B.M. (2011) Communication in troubled waters: responses of fish communication systems to changing environments. Evolutionary Ecology, 25, 623640.
  • Vasconcelos, R.O., Amorim, M.C.P. & Ladich, F. (2007) Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 21042112.
  • Warren, P.S., Katti, M., Ermann, M. & Brazel, A. (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise. Animal Behaviour, 71, 491502.
  • Wiley, R.H. & Richards, D.G. (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in atmosphere – implications for evolution of animal vocalizations. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 3, 6994.
  • Zelick, R. & Narins, P.M. (1985) Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frog Eleutherodactylus Coqui. Journal of Comparative Physiology A-Sensory Neural and Behavioural Physiology, 156, 223229.