Antipodal focusing of seismic waves due to large meteorite impacts on Earth
Article first published online: 31 AUG 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05170.x
© 2011 The Authors Geophysical Journal International © 2011 RAS
Additional Information
How to Cite
Meschede, M. A., Myhrvold, C. L. and Tromp, J. (2011), Antipodal focusing of seismic waves due to large meteorite impacts on Earth. Geophysical Journal International, 187: 529–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05170.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 31 AUG 2011
- Accepted 2011 July 22. Received 2011 July 9; in original form 2011 March 11
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Guided waves;
- Computational seismology;
- Wave propagation;
- Impact phenomena;
- Large igneous provinces;
- Planetary volcanism
SUMMARY
We examine focusing of seismic waves at the antipode of large terrestrial meteorite impacts, using the Chicxulub impact as our case study. Numerical simulations are based on a spectral-element method, representing the impact as a Gaussian force in time and space. Simulating the impact as a point source at the surface of a spherically symmetric earth model results in deceptively large peak displacements at the antipode. Earth’s ellipticity, lateral heterogeneity and a spatially distributed source limit high-frequency waves from constructively interfering at the antipode, thereby reducing peak displacement by a factor of 4. Nevertheless, for plausible impact parameters, we observe peak antipodal displacements of ∼4 m, dynamic stresses in excess of 15 bar, and strains of 2 × 10−5 . Although these values are significantly lower than prior estimates, mainly based on a point source in a spherically symmetric earth model, wave interference en route to the antipode induces ‘channels’ of peak stress that are five times greater than in surrounding areas. Underneath the antipode, we observed ‘chimneys’ of peak stress, strain and velocity, with peak values exceeding 50 bar, 10−5 and 0.1 m s−1, respectively. Our results put quantitative constraints on the feasibility of impact-induced antipodal volcanism and seismicity, as well as mantle plume and hotspot formation.

1365-246X/asset/GJI_centre.gif?v=1&s=16d020b89eb31018f67640eaeffa549771f20e71)
1365-246X/asset/GJI_right.gif?v=1&s=43d3e3120b4ec2a9aca8a69c69c19714269fc4cf)
