Get access

Climate change manipulations show Antarctic flora is more strongly affected by elevated nutrients than water



    1. Institute for Conservation Biology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia,
    Search for more papers by this author
    • 1Present address: Environmental Protection and Change, Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Environment and Heritage, 203 Channel Highway Kingston, Tas. 7050, Australia.


    1. Institute for Conservation Biology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia,
    Search for more papers by this author

    1. The Centre for Marine Studies, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia,
    Search for more papers by this author

    1. Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author

Sharon A. Robinson, tel. +61 02 4221 5753, fax +61 02 4221 4135, e-mail:


Climate change is expected to affect the high latitudes first and most severely, rendering Antarctica one of the most significant baseline environments for the study of global climate change. The indirect effects of climate warming, including changes to the availability of key environmental resources, such as water and nutrients, are likely to have a greater impact upon continental Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems than the effects of fluctuations in temperature alone. To investigate the likely impacts of a wetter climate on Antarctic terrestrial communities a multiseason, manipulative field experiment was conducted in the floristically important Windmill Islands region of East Antarctica. Four cryptogamic communities (pure bryophyte, moribund bryophyte, crustose and fructicose lichen-dominated) received increased water and/or nutrient additions over two consecutive summer seasons. The increased water approximated an 18% increase in snow melt days (0.2°C increase in temperature), while the nutrient addition of 3.5 g N m−2 yr−1 was within the range of soil N in the vicinity. A range of physiological and biochemical measurements were conducted in order to quantify the community response. While an overall increase in productivity in response to water and nutrient additions was observed, productivity appeared to respond more strongly to nutrient additions than to water additions. Pure bryophyte communities, and lichen communities dominated by the genus Usnea, showed stronger positive responses to nutrient additions, identifying some communities that may be better able to adapt and prosper under the ameliorating conditions associated with a warmer, wetter future climate. Under such a climate, productivity is overall likely to increase but some cryptogamic communities are likely to thrive more than others. Regeneration of moribund bryophytes appears likely only if a future moisture regime creates consistently moist conditions.

Get access to the full text of this article