SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
gcb2728-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docWord document84K Appendix S1: Meteorological data and gap-filling (filling missing time periods and missing variables).
gcb2728-sup-0002-AppendixS2.docWord document382K Appendix S2: Growth and maintenance respiration.
gcb2728-sup-0003-AppendixS3.docWord document83K Appendix S3: Henry's law.
gcb2728-sup-0004-FigureS1.epsimage/eps585K Figure S1. The theoretical variation of r g with CUE and for example values of Y g and α (see text for definitions). Uncertainty in the value of Y g does affect r g (lines show values at Y g=0.75 and grey bands show values for the range 0.7 < Y g<0.8), with higher values of Y g giving lower values of r g. The arrow shows the theoretical direction of forest succession (Landsberg & Sands, 2011 suggested that CUE decreases from ≈ 0.5 in young to ≈ 0.3 in mature forests, and this may be combined with an increase in carbon storage from α ≈ 0 in early successional stages to α ≈ CUE in mature patches to give r g decreasing from 0.25 to 0). The r g=0.25 estmate of JULES (Cox, 2001; Clark et al., 2011) may be understood as a maximal value for vegetation with negligible storage (high growth), CUE < 0.6 and Y g=0.75.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.