• TNF/TNFR-superfamily;
  • gene targeting;
  • organogenesis;
  • inflammation;
  • host defence;
  • autoimmunity


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

The members of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)/tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily are critically involved in the maintenance of homeostasis of the immune system. The biological functions of this system encompass beneficial and protective effects in inflammation and host defence as well as a crucial role in organogenesis. At the same time, members of this superfamily are responsible for host damaging effects in sepsis, cachexia, and autoimmune diseases. This review summarizes recent progress in the immunbiology of the TNF/TNFR superfamily focusing on results obtained from animal studies using gene targeted mice. The different modes of signalling pathways affecting cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune organ development as well as host defence are reviewed. Molecular and cellular mechanisms that demonstrate a therapeutic potential by targeting individual receptors or ligands for the treatment of chronic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases are discussed.


Activation induced TNF-receptor


B-cell activating factor receptor


B-cell maturation antigen


B-lymphocyte chemoattractant


Ectodysplasin (EDA) receptor


Epstein Barr virus-induced molecule 1 ligand chemokine


Follicular dendritic cells


Herpes virus entry mediator




homologous to lymphotoxins exhibits inducible expression and competes with herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D for HVEM a receptor expressed on T cells


Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein




Receptor interacting protein


Secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine


Transmembrane activator and CAML interactor


TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand receptor 1


TNF-like receptor apoptosis mediating protein


Member of the TNFR family


X-linked EDA-A2 receptor


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

When lymphotoxin (LT) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)/cachectin were first identified1–3 and subsequently their cDNAs cloned4 it eventually became evident that these two cytokines are the prototypic members of a gene superfamily that regulates essential biological functions in mammalians.5

With molecular biology techniques arising, many related proteins of both ligands and receptors have been identified. Membrane-bound and/or soluble ligands of the TNF superfamily interact with one or more specific, membrane bound or soluble receptors which together comprise the corresponding TNF receptor (TNFR) superfamily. The majority of the members of this TNF/TNFR superfamily is expressed by immune cells. Activation of the TNFR members via their ligands affects cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and apoptosis of responding cells.

These biological activities encompass beneficial effects for the host in inflammation and protective immune responses in infectious diseases as well as crucial roles in organogenesis of secondary lymphoid organs and the maintenance of lymphoid structures throughout the body. On the other hand, some members of the TNF/TNFR superfamily, especially TNF, can exert host damaging effects in sepsis, fever syndromes, cachexia as well as in autoimmune diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease).

The TNF superfamily ligands are type II transmembrane proteins (intracellular N-terminus) which are biologically active as self assembling, non covalent bound, trimers.6 Approximately 20–30% amino acid homology in their interacting protein interfaces are responsible for the assembly of the trimeric tertiary structure. The external surfaces of the ligand trimers have little similarity in sequence accounting for the individual receptor specificity.7–9 Some of these ligands, e.g. TNF, are active both as a membrane integrated and as a soluble form released from the cell membrane after proteolytic cleavage, mainly by metalloproteinases induced by various stimuli. Certain ligands are expressed only as soluble molecules, e.g. LTα; but may also be recruited to the cell membrane to form heterotrimeric membrane anchored complexes and thereby enhancing regulatory specificity and complexity.10

The TNF-like receptors are type I transmembrane proteins characterized by cysteine-rich domains (CRD) that are the hallmark of the TNFR superfamily. These pseudorepeats are defined by intrachain disulphides generated by highly conserved cysteine residues within the receptor chains.11 Significant variation in the number of CRD exist among the receptor family members, from B-cell activating factor receptor (BAFFR) with only a partial CRD, to TNFRI and TNFRII which exhibit the most common structure bearing three CRD and up to six CRDs found in CD30.

Currently more than 40 members of the TNF/TNFR superfamily (for overview see: have been identified. Currently even more knowledge about TNF/TNFR family members and their central biological role in host defence, inflammation, apoptosis, autoimmunity and organogenesis is just emerging. Members of the TNF/TNFR superfamily are now important targets in therapies against human diseases such as autoimmune disorders, IBD, osteoporosis, and cancer.

Modes of signalling

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

During the years it became apparent that most members of the TNF superfamily interact with more than one receptor of the corresponding superfamily of cognate receptors. This cross-utilization of ligands and receptors suggested redundancy in the biological functions within this superfamily. However, genetic approaches, mainly by the use of gene targeted mouse strains it was possible to define the physiological function linked to individual ligands or receptors in more detail and it became clear that almost each receptor–ligand system of this TNF/TNFR superfamily appears to have a unique and non-redundant function.

Recent results suggest that some members of the TNFR superfamily (FAS, TNFRI and TNFRII) preassemble on the cell surface prior to ligand binding.12 The formation of the preassembled complexes on the cell surface requires an N-terminal amino acid domain including parts of the first CRD. This region termed PLAD for ‘preligand assembly domain’ is necessary and sufficient for self assembly of these receptors on the cell surface. The PLAD interactions are specific and allow only the formation of receptor-chain homotrimers, however, it has also been demonstrated that transplanting the PLAD of TNFRI onto TNFRII results in the assembly of heterotrimeric receptor complexes.12

Upon receptor stimulation some of the TNFR superfamily members are cleaved from the cell surface (e.g. TNFRII, 4-1BB) or directly expressed as soluble isoforms lacking the transmembrane domain (e.g. TNFRII, 4-1BB, and FAS) being still capable of binding its cognate ligand. This represents a cellular mechanism, presumably in pathophysiological conditions, to antagonize ligand induced receptor stimulation.13 Interestingly, a recent report describes the identification of an intracellularly expressed TNFRII isoform. This study demonstrates further evidence that this TNFRII isoform mediates ligand dependant intracellular signalling, thus providing an example for intracellular cytokine receptor activation.14

The ligands can also form membrane-integrated trimers (e.g. TNF, homologous to lymphotoxins exhibits inducible expression and competes with herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D for HVEM a receptor expressed on T cells (LIGHT)) and some observations suggest that these membrane-anchored ligands can transduce reverse signals into the ligand-expressing cell when engaging their cognate receptors.15,16 Intense investigations are ongoing to clarify the reverse signalling pathways and their biological significance.

Receptor activation by the TNF family ligands causes recruitment of several intracellular adaptor proteins which activate multiple signal transduction pathways. Based on their intracellular sequences the members of the TNFR superfamily can be classified into three major groups.17

The first group, including FAS (CD95), TNFRI, TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1) (DR4), TRAIL-R2 (DR5), TRAIL-R4 (DcR2), TNF-like receptor apoptosis mediating protein (TRAMP) (DR3), Ectodysplasin (EDA) receptor (EDAR) contains so called death domains (DD) in their cytoplasmic domains (Fig. 1). Activation of these receptors leads to recruitment of intracellular death domain containing adaptors such as FAS-associated death domain (FADD) and TNFR-associated death domain (TRADD).18,19 These molecules activate the caspase cascade and subsequently induce apoptosis. In contrast to FAS, TNFRI only signals cell death when protein synthesis is blocked. The activation of TNFRI induces the activation and transcription of inflammatory genes.20,21 This means that TNFRI signalling provides also a mechanism to protect cells from an apoptotic response. This is also reflected on a molecular level that TNFRI primarily recruits TRADD while FAS interacts with FADD. TRADD in turn can associate with TNFR-associated factor (TRAF)2, TRAF1 and receptor interacting protein (RIP) to activate the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways, which protect cells from apoptosis.22,23 Mice with a genetic deletion of RIP are unable to activate NF-κB in response to TNFRI stimulation leading to TNF induced apoptosis.24 TRAF-2 deficiency in turn led to the inability to activate the JNK pathway in response to TNF.25 Therefore, TNFRI activation leads to signalling complexes that activate both the apoptotic caspase cascade and the NF-κB and JNK anti-apoptotic pathways (Fig. 2a). This balance is regulated at numerous levels including regulation of receptor/ligand expression, soluble decoy receptor expression and anti-apoptotic ligand induction.26


Figure 1. The TNF/TNFR superfamily. The TNF-related ligands are shown in blue and arrows indicate interactions with their receptors. The ectodomains of the TNFR superfamily are shown in grey with the appropriate number of CRDs. Death domains within the cytoplasmic domain are indicated as red cylinders. All other receptors bind TRAF adaptors for signal transduction.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 2. (a) Signal transduction of TNFRI. After binding of TNF, TNFRI first recruits TNFR associated death domain (TRADD) as a platform adaptor and assembles alternative signalling complexes. One complex involves receptor interacting protein (RIP) and TNFR associated factor 2 (TRAF2) which links ligand induced signalling to the activation of the transcription factors NF-κB and AP1. Another signalling complex is formed dependant on the internalization of activated TNF/TNFRI complexes (TNF receptosomes). During endocytosis FADD and caspase 8 are recruited to form the death inducing signalling complex (DISC) resulting in TNF-induced apoptosis. (b) Lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTβR) mediated NF-κB activation.Upon ligand induced activation of the LTβR two pathways are engaged. Activation of the IKK complex (IKKα, IKKβ, IKKγ/NEMO) and RelA controls the expression of inflammatory genes such as MIP-2, VCAM-1 and MIP-1β. The second pathway involves the activation of the NF-κB inducing kinase (NIK), which in turn activates IKKα for generating active p52 derived from its p100 precursor. Association of p52 with another partner (e.g. RelB) activates the transcription of genes implicated in lymphoid organogenesis and homeostasis such as SLC, BLC, ELC and BAFF.

Download figure to PowerPoint

To prevent ligand-independent activation of some death domain containing TNFR family members the silencer of death domains (SODD) proteins associate constitutively with TNFRI and DR3 but not to other death receptor family members such as FAS, DR4 and DR5.27 It had been put forward that SODD proteins bind to the DD of these receptors and inhibit the recruitment of TRADD. Upon ligand-induced receptor aggregation the association of SODD is disrupted allowing the binding of TRADD. However, genetic deletion of SODD revealed that no alteration in the activation of NF-κB was observed after stimulation with TNF or the activation of DR3 in SODD gene deficient cells. Furthermore, resistance to lipopolysaacharide (LPS) combined with or without d-galactosamine hydrochloride (LPS-D-GalN) challenge, and infection with Listeria monocytogenes all depending on a functional TNFRI signalling28–30 was similar in wild-type and SODD deficient mice.31 These in vivo data do not support a unique role for SODD in the signalling pathway of TNFRI and DR3.

Further mechanisms to control the induction of apoptosis mediated by TNFR family members is achieved by targeting downstream caspases.32 Expression of inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) like IAP-1, IAP-2 and X-linked X-IAP specifically inactivate effector caspases33,34 and are up-regulated in an NF-κB-dependant manner.35

The second group of receptors, including TNFRII, CD27, CD 30, CD40, LTβR, OX40, 4-1BB, BAFFR, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK), transmembrane activator and calcium-signal modulating cyclophilin ligand (CAML) interactor (TACI), Fn14, herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM), activation induced TNF-receptor (AITR), X-linked EDA-A2 receptor (XEDAR) and the member of the TNFR family (TROY) contain TNF-receptor associated factor (TRAF)-interacting motifs (TIMs) in their cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 1). Activation of TIM containing TNFR family members leads to the recruitment of TRAF family members and the subsequent activation of signal transduction pathways like NF-κB, JNK, p38, extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K).17

Until today six mammalian TRAFs (TRAF1 to TRAF6) have been identified. TRAFs are evolutionary conserved proteins with homologues found in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans.36 All TRAFs are characterized by a highly conserved motive the so called TRAF domain. This C-terminal protein domain mediates binding to the receptors, the formation of homo- and heterodimers and the interaction with a number of additional signalling molecules such as the NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK),37 in contrast the N-terminal domain has been shown to bind the anti apoptotic adaptors cIAP1 and 2.38 Although TRAF molecules have no enzymatic activity they can induce several signal transduction pathways which regulate cellular processes ranging from proliferation and differentiation to cell death. Tremendous work has been done to investigate the different associations and binding specificities of TRAFs with members of the TIM-containing TNFR family members in order to identify TRAF-activated signal transduction pathways.17 One of the best described is the NF-κB pathway, which plays a central role in the biological functions mediated by a variety of TNFR family members.

The activation of NF-κB by TNF and other members of the TNFR superfamily is mediated through the recruitment of different TRAFs. For instance TRAF2 is recruited by TNFRI, whereas TRAF2, TRAF5 and TRAF6 are recruited by RANK to activate NF-κB by RANKL.39,40 Just how TRAF2 mediates NF-κB activation has not yet been established. TRAF2 has been shown to interact with NIK.41 Gene deletion studies, however, have indicated that NIK is not required for NF-κB activation by TNF but is required for NF-κB activation by the LTβR, CD40 and BAFFR.42,43

Interestingly there are some receptors of this family which are capable of activating two pathways simultaneously like TNFRI which activation leads to the induction of apoptosis and the activation of NF-κB. A recent report suggests that upon TNF binding, TNFRI is capable of translocating to lipid rafts and that this recruitment is essential for TNF mediated NF-κB activation. Furthermore this study provides in vitro evidence that interfering with lipid raft formation switches TNF signalling from NF-κB activation to apoptosis.20 Very recent data demonstrated that upon ligand binding the TNF-TNFRI ligand receptor complex internalizes (TNF-receptosomes) followed by recruitment of the adapter molecules TRADD, FADD and caspase 8 to establish the death inducing signalling complex (DISC). A TNFRI internalization domain (TRID) has been identified which is required for receptor endocytosis. This study provides furthermore evidence that TNFRI internalisation, DISC formation and subsequent induction of apoptosis are inseparable events44 (Fig. 2a).

On the other hand, there are also receptors like the LTβR, CD40 and BAFFR, which can activate NF-κB using an additional, alternative NF-κB pathway. This became evident by examination of the natural occurring aly/aly mouse which has a defect in the NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK).45,46 The activation of the classical NF-κB pathway in response to TNF or bacterial lipopolysccharide (LPS) requires the phosphorylation of IκBs by the activation of the IkB-kinase (IKK) complex composed of IKKα, IKKβ and IKKγ, the latter also known as NEMO.47 The activation of IKKβ and RelA which controls the activation of inflammatory genes such as vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), mucosal addressin vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), membrane inflammatory protein (MIP)-1β and MIP-2. IKKα activates the alternative NF-κB signalling pathway which involves the activation of NIK, and the subsequent processing of the p100 precursor protein to generate active p52 followed by the translocation to the nucleus. Association of p52 with RelB induces the transcription of genes implicated in secondary lymphoid organogenesis and homeostasis such as secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (SLC), B-lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC) and Epstein Barr virus-induced molecule 1 ligand chemokine (ELC) and stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1)48,49 (Fig. 2b).

The third group of receptors including TRAIL-R3 (DcR1), DcR3 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) do not contain signalling motifs but instead compete with the other two groups of receptors for their corresponding ligands (Fig. 1).

Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Over the last decade, since the discovery that LTα-, LTβ- and LTβR-deficient mice lack several types of peripheral lymphoid tissues such as Peyer's patches (PPs) and lymph nodes (LNs) the critical role of LT signalling in lymphoid tissue organisation has been clearly demonstrated.50–52 Expression of surface LTαβ on CD45+/interleukin (IL)-7R+/CXCR5+ progenitor cells also termed inducer cells or lymphoid tissue inducing cells (LTIC) originating from the fetal liver is required for the development of LNs and PPs during embryogenesis.53–55 The second cellular component in the assembly of PP anlagen are cells of mesenchymal origin termed organizer cells expressing such molecules like IL-7, LTβR and BLC that are complementary to the molecules expressed on LTICs.56 It has been shown that IL-7R stimulation induces the expression of LTαβ on LTICs, which in turn, via LTβR stimulation on the organizer cells, induces CXCL13 and moreover the expression of VCAM-1 and MadCAM-1.54

Because of the stimulating ability of these two cellular components the region in which these cells assemble expands autonomously. As clearly indicated by previous studies, LTαβ expression on LTICs can also be induced by receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK);57 however, PP anlagen are formed normally in RANK-deficient mice.58

In addition it has also been shown that TNF is capable of inducing LTαβ expression on LTICs.57 This is supported by the observation that in TNFRI deficient mice PP formation is aberrant.30,59 Because no defect in organogenesis so far has been described for TNFRII-deficient mice, TNFRI seems to be the major receptor type for transducing TNF signals during organogenesis. Administration of a LTβR inhibitor (LTβR:Ig) during pregnancy leads to defects in both LN and PP development similar to those observed in LTβ-deficient mice.60,61 Injection of LTβR:Ig after birth or transgenic overexpression of LTβR:Ig postnatally revealed that the formation of LNs and PPs could not be disrupted at this stage.61,62 These results are consistent with the notion that PP and LN genesis occur only within a narrow time window during embryogenesis. It is interestingly to note that LN genesis but not PP genesis of LTα-deficient mice which lack LNs and PPs can be restored by systemically delivered soluble LTβR agonist.63 Recent results indicate that for the development of LNs and PPs LIGHT is not essential, however, in LIGHT/LTβ double-deficient mice a cooperative role for both ligands of the LTβR in the organogenesis of mesenterial LN can be demonstrated.64,65

It has been further demonstrated that PP anlagen are defective in common γ chain and Janus kinase-3 (Jak-3) as well as in IL-7Rα deficient mice indicating that the IL-7Rα signal is transmitted through the γ-chain/Jak-3 pathway.56,66 Accumulating evidence indicates that similar mechanisms are involved in the LN anlagen but the question remains how the higher order of architecture in these lymphoid tissues is initiated and maintained.

In secondary lymphatic tissues which are the primary locations for the generation of the humoral immune response co-ordinated trafficking of the immune cells is maintained by direct interaction of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with T and B cells leading to germinal center formation, immunoglobulin class switch and affinity maturation of the antibody response. Results using genetically modified mice indicate that members of the TNFR superfamily, mainly TNF and LT are required for lymphoid organogenesis and are also crucial for the maintenance of these structures and the generation of humoral immune responses in the adult.67 It was proposed that LT expressed on B cells is the main contributor in the maintenance of an organized lymphoid structure.51 To address the specific contributions of TNF and/or LT by T or B cells in the maintainance of splenic microarchitecture bone marrow (BM) transfer experiments and tissue specific gene knock out mice were employed. Transfer of BM from wild type mice in LTα deficient recipients restored B-cell follicles, follicular dendritic cells (FDC) networks as well as antibody responses to T-cell specific antigens.51 The contrast transfer of BM cells from BCR knockout (ko) + LTβ ko cells or BCR ko + TNF ko cells in BCR ko recipients did not restore FDC development.68 These results are consistent with data obtained from B-cell specific LTβ-deficient mice. In these mice splenic microarchitecture was strongly affected and peanut agglutinin (PNA)-positive GC formation virtually absent. In contrast, normal splenic microarchitecture was observed in T-cell specific LTβ-deficient mice consistent with the results based on BM reconstitution experiments described above. No deficiency in B-cell follicles, FDC or GC formation could be detected.69 Importantly, LIGHT-deficient mice did not demonstrate defects in the structure of the secondary lymphatic organs and no additional defects in splenic microarchitecture when crossed to LTβ-deficient mice.65 These results suggest that the activation of the LTβR by LTαβ plays a dominant role in the maintenance of lymphoid structures. So far, studies employing mice with impaired TNFRI signalling either by using TNFRI-deficient mice, or mice expressing a TNFRI:Ig transgene revealed that TNF signalling is also critically required for FDC and GC maintenance.62,70 These observations are also supported by experiments using neutralizing anti-TNF antibodies.63

Taken together these studies revealed a critical role for B cells expressing LT and TNF in the formation of GCs and FDC in the spleen and in the generation of an humoral immune response to T-cell dependant antigens. Beside these profound defects in lymphoid microachitecture and subsequently in the humoral immune response in mice deficient for TNFRI, LTα, LTβ and LTβR other members of the TNFR superfamily seem also to be involved in these processes.5,71 CD40 signalling is crucial for T- and B-cell collaboration as humans and mice with defective genes for CD40 or CD40L are impaired in Ig class switching and GC formation.72,73 OX40 disruption leads to impaired humoral responses while APRIL deficient mice are impaired in immunoglobulin A (IgA) class switching.74,75

The role of the TNF/TNFR superfamily members in lymphoid organogenesis, spleen architecture and humoral immunoglobulin responses based on studies using gene targeted mice are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1.  Role of TNF/TNFR superfamily members in lymphoid organogenesis and immunoglobulin responses based on studies using gene targeted mice
Targeted geneOrganogenesisIg responseReference
LTα, LTβRAbsentAbsentImpaired IgG, IgE, IgA50, 192–194
LTβ25% AbsentAbsentImpaired IgG, IgE195–197
75% MLNReduced IgA   
TNF, TNFR1PresentReducedPartial impaired IgG30, 198–200
LTα/TNFAbsentAbsentImpaired202, 203
LTβ/TNF25% AbsentAbsentImpaired204
75% MLN   
B-LTβPresentPresentImpaired IgG205
LIGHTPresentPresent 65, 156
LIGHT/LTβ75% AbsentAbsentND65
25% MLN   
TNFR2NormalNormalNormal97, 206, 207
Rank, RankLAbsentNormalImpaired58, 118
CD40, CD40LNormalNormalImpaired208–210
BAFF, BAFFRNormalNormalImpaired176, 211, 212
APRILNormalNDImpaired IgA75, 213
Table 2.  Role of TNF/TNFR superfamily members in spleen architecture based on studies using gene targeted mice
Targeted geneSpleen architectureReference
Marginal zoneT/B-cell areaGC/FDC
  1. ND, not determined.

LTα, LTβRAbsentMixedAbsent50, 192, 193
LTβAbsentPartially mixedAbsent195–197
TNF, TNFR1EnlargedSeparate no MAdCAMAbsent30, 198–200
LTβ/TNFR1AbsentPartially mixedAbsent201
LTα/TNFAbsentMixedAbsent202, 203
LTβ/TNFAbsentPartially mixedAbsent204
LIGHTNormalSeparateNormal65, 156
TNFR2NormalNormalNormal97, 206, 207
Rank, RankLReducedSeparateNormal58, 118
CD40, CD40LNormalSeparateAbsent/Present208–210
BAFF, BAFFRNormalSeparateAbsent/Present176, 211, 214
APRILNormalNormalND75, 213

Host defence

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Neutralizing TNF demonstrated that the host defence against pathogens is severely impaired in the absence of TNF.76–79 By the use of gene-targeted mice it has been shown that TNFRI is essential for the survival of infections with intracellular bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium, and Salmonella typhimurium.30,80 TNFRI-deficient mice are incapable of controlling the replication of L. monocytogenes in phagocytes although the antimicrobial defence systems that generate reactive oxygen radicals (p47 phox/gp91phox) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (iNOS) are not defective in these mice. Interestingly the expression of TNFRI on BM derived cells is sufficient to control the infection.29 In a recent report Serbina and coworkers identified a TNF/iNOS producing dendritic cell subset (Tip-DCs) in the spleens of mice infected with L. monocytogenes. The absence of these Tip-DCs results in profound TNF and iNOS deficiencies and an inability to clear primary bacterial infection.81 Similarly, TNFRI-deficient mice infected with the intracellular parasites Leishmania major or Trypanosoma cruzi showed higher parasitaemia and mortality than control mice.82,83 A crucial role of TNFRI but not for TNFRII in murine toxoplasma induced disease has been further demonstrated.84 Recent results employing TNFRI and TNFRII double deficient mice demonstrated that TNFR signalling is required for T-cell dependant pulmonary inflammation and lung injury during pneumocystis pneumonia and that T cells use the TNFRI and TNFRII signalling pathway in response to an extracellular fungal pathogen.85

Studies in mouse infection models have clearly revealed that TNF is a crucial component of both the antibacterially protective and the inflammatory immune response to M. tuberculosis. TNF is necessary for optimal co-ordination of both the differentiation of specific T cells to secrete the appropriate T helper 1 (Th1) cytokines and the development of granulomas in with activated epithelioid macrophages restrict mycobacterial growth.86 During infection TNF increases the phagocytic ability of macrophages and enhances the killing of mycobacteria, particularly in concert with interferon-γ (IFN-γ).87 On the other hand TNF is crucial for the recruitment of inflammatory cells by stimulating chemokine and cell adhesion molecule production leading to the accumulation of focussed mononuclear cells.88 Thus, in TNF or TNFRI-deficient mice granuloma formation is significantly delayed.89 In addition, TNFRI signalling is required for the modulation of the T-cell response because in TNFRI-deficient mice T-cell dependant granuloma decomposition is observed.90 Because LTα also engages the TNFRI and TNFRII receptor, LTα has a role similar to that of TNF as in the absence of LTα granulomas are not efficiently formed and T cells inappropriately activated do not enter into the lesions, resulting in premature death of infected mice.91 On the other hand, activation of the LTβR by heterotrimeric LTα1β2 is necessary for the full activation of the antibacterial defence mechanisms. Macrophages in LTβR-deficient mice show a gross delay in inducible nitric oxidase sythethase (iNOS) expression and rapidly succumb to M. tuberculosis infection. In contrast, LIGHT-deficient mice proofed to be equally resistant to M. tuberculosis infection as wild type mice.86

Since signalling of TNF and LTα are essential and non redundant prerequisites for immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis it is not surprising that treatment of patients with chronic inflammatory processes such as Crohn's disease (CD) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis with agents blocking TNF activity leads to an increased risk of reactivating tuberculosis.92–96

Using TNFRII-deficient mice and bone marrow chimeras expressing TNFRII either on haematopoietic or non-haematopoietic cells demonstrated the requirement of TNFRII expression on vascular cells to induce TNF-mediated neurovascular lesions in experimental cerebral malaria.97,98

Treatment of mice infected with M. bovis bacillus Calmette–Guèrin (BCG) with a soluble inhibitor of LTβR activation (LTβR:Ig) interfered with granuloma formation by inhibiting macrophage activation and iNOS activity. Decreased IFN-γ and increased IL-4 production was also observed suggesting that the LTβR pathway is important in BCG infection in order to favour a Th1-type immune response.99 A recent report demonstrates that transgenic mice expressing a soluble form of HVEM (HVEM:Ig) showed marked resistance to herpes simplex-1 (HSV-1) infection when challenged intraperitoneally with HSV-1.100 The role of TNF/TNFR superfamily members in bacterial infections based on studies using gene targeted mice are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.  Role of TNF/TNFR superfamily members in bacterial infections based on studies using gene targeted mice
Targeted geneInnate host defenceReferences
TNFR 1High susceptibility for: M. tuberculosis, BCG, M. avium, S. typhimurium, L. monocytogenes,  L. major, T. cruzi, T. gondii90, 200, 215–217
TNFR2Slightly higer susceptibility for: L. monocytogenes, Plasmodium berghei ANKA97, 206
LTβRHigh susceptibility for: M. tuberculosis, L. monocytogenes80
TNFHigh susceptibility for: M. tuberculosis, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes198, 215, 218
FasHigh susceptibility for: L. monocytogenes219
LTαHigh susceptibility for: S. aureus, M. tuberculosis218
LIGHTNot affected for: M. tuberculosis220


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Very soon after the availability of purified TNF, it became evident that TNF has systemic endotoxic activity leading to fever, hypotension, and shock.101 Detailed investigations on the biological activities revealed that TNF is one of the most prominent inflammatory mediators and absolutely central in starting off the inflammatory reactions of the innate immune system including induction of cytokine production, activation and expression of adhesion molecules, and growth stimulation.102 The potent biological activity of TNF also explains the danger of tissue damage when TNF action is not carefully controlled.103

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the intestinal tract. There is increasing evidence that the immune system plays a critical role in the development and perpetuation of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The relevance of balanced cytokine levels has been established in colitis animal models.104 Results obtained by neutralization of TNF, IFN-γ or LTα1β2 in several colitis models demonstrated that these cytokines play a central role in experimental colitis.105,106 The LT pathway has been shown to be as important as the TNF system for disease development.107 In a dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis model inhibition of the LTβR signalling pathway using LTβR:Ig ameliorated the development and the histological manifestation of intestinal inflammation and results in the reduction of inflammatory cytokine expression such as TNF, IL-1 and IL-6. Furthermore a significant down-regulation of MAdCAM-1 expression in the intestinal epithelium was observed entailing reduced lymphocyte margination and extravasation into the inflammed mucosa.108

The first evidence that CD40/CD40L interactions are important in intestinal inflammation was demonstrated by the beneficial effect of CD40L antibodies in the murine model of hapten-induced colitis.109 Additional evidence in other models of experimental colitis, e.g. induced by transfer of CD45RBhigh CD4+ T cells into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice demonstrated that the development of colitis was paralleled by an increased expression of CD40 and its ligand on mRNA as well as on protein level. CD40L positive T cells induce the activation of monocytes and the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Activation of CD40 by CD40L positive T cells induces up-regulation of adhesion molecules and the production of chemokines by microvascular endothelial and mesenchymal cells, which very efficiently amplify the immune response in specific tissues and perpetuate mucosal inflammation.110 A phase I trial with antagonistic monoclonal antibody against CD40 is under way in CD patients and phase I and II trials with a humanized anti-CD40L antibody have been initiated.111 The results of these ongoing clinical trials will define the value of a biological therapy of blocking the CD40/CD40L pathway in IBD.

In vitro data suggested that the newly discovered TNF-superfamily cytokine TL1A could also be involved in initiating or promoting the Th1 response by enhancing IFN-γ production in UC and CD.112 Lamina propria T cells, especially CD4+ T cells constitutively express TL1A and a higher fraction of lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC) express the cognate receptor DR3 in UC and CD. IFN-γ production by PBMC and lamina propria lymphocytes (LPL) was dose-dependently augmented by using recombinant TL1A or by activation of its receptor DR3 with agonistic monoclonal antibody (mAb).112 The use of corresponding animal models should help to clarify whether TL1A and/or DR3 expression could possibly have a significant influence on mucosal inflammation in vivo.

Transgenic overexpression of LIGHT has been demonstrated to induce T-cell mediated intestinal inflammation in the RAG-1–/– transfer model accompanied by a dramatic increase in serum IgA levels similar to those in human IgA nephropathy (IgAN). LIGHT tg/LTβR–/– mice revealed that the engagement of LTβR by LIGHT is essential for both intestinal inflammation and hyperserum IgA syndrome in this animal model. These observations indicate a critical contribution of dysregulated LIGHT expression to intestinal inflammation and the pathogenesis to IgAN.113

Further evidence that the LT/LIGHT axis is as important as the TNF system for disease development has emerged in the murine collagen arthritis (CIA) model.

Prophylactic treatment with LTβR:Ig fusion protein blocked the induction of collagen-induced arthritis in mice and adjuvant arthritis in Lewis rats.114 Treatment of mice with established collagen induced arthritis reduced the severity of arthritic symptoms and joint tissue damage. Because treatment with LTβR:Ig ablated follicular dendritic cell (FDC) networks in the draining lymph nodes and impaired class switch and affinity maturation in the B-cell response these effects may account for the reduced pathological signs of disease. However, LTβR:Ig treatment did not affect passive immune complex triggered joint inflammation induced by a mixture of anticollagen mAb and endotoxin115 whereas anti-very late antigen-1 (VLA-1) mAb and TNFRI:Ig reduced disease symptoms in parallel experiments.116 This result indicates that inflammation triggered by immune complex deposition in the joints and endotoxin-induced monocyte/granulocyte activation does not involve the LT/LIGHT axis in this model of disease.

Further investigations targeting the B-cell response in CIA have demonstrated that the TNF-ligand superfamily member BAFF and the proliferation induced ligand APRIL together with their cognate receptor TACI play an important role in the humoral immune response in CIA. TACI:Ig blocks the activation of T cells in vitro and inhibits antigen-specific T-cell activation and priming in vivo. In the mouse model of CIA TACI:Ig treatment substantially inhibited inflammation, bone and cartilage destruction and disease development.117 Thus, BAFF and APRIL are important not only for B-cell function but also for T-cell mediated immune responses.

A role of osteoprotegerin and other member of the TNFR superfamily has been implicated by recent studies. Osteoprotegerin expressed by osteoblasts inhibits bone resorption and binds with high affinity to its ligand RANKL, thereby inhibiting RANKL from binding to its receptor RANK. RANKL-deficient mice exhibit both severe immunological abnormalities and osteoporosis. RANKL expressed by activated T cells induces osteoclastogenesis via a mechanism enhanced by cytokines, e.g. TNF and IL-1, that promote both inflammation and bone resorption. On the other hand this mechanism is inhibited by OPG, IL-4 and IL-10 which have anti-inflammatory effects and inhibit osteoclast formation. Thus bone erosion may result from activation of the RANK/RANKL system. Blocking this mechanism by OPG therapy might proof beneficial in rheumatoid inflammation.118

Gene-deficient mice lacking TNFRI and/or TNFRII proofed to be essential in dissecting the roles of these receptors in mediating and modulating inflammatory responses like in the pathogenesis of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE).30 While TNFRI and TNFRI and TNFRII double-deficient mice were completely resistant to clinical signs of disease paralleled by a specific Th1 cytokine production, TNFRII deficient mice exhibited exacerbated signs of EAE, enhanced Th1 cytokine production and an increased CD4+ T-cell infiltration in the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, TNFRI seems to be required for the initiation of the disease, whereas TNFRII may influence the regulation of the immune response.119

Furthermore, exacerbated endotoxin induced serum TNF levels and increased pulmonary inflammation in mice lacking TNFRII suggests a downmodulating role of TNFRII-mediated inflammatory responses.120


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Despite advances in supportive care, sepsis and septic shock remain a major cause of mortality. Sepsis constitutes a systemic response to infection.121 This response is characterized by both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory phases paralleled by the sequential expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. TNF and IL-1 have been identified as the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines of the systemic inflammatory response as well as a major component in the pathogenesis of the septic shock syndrome. Their pro-inflammatory effects can be inhibited by soluble receptors/receptor-antagonists and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-βin vitro and in vivo.122–125

Recent work has focused on modulating these responses in animal models. Several studies identified TNF as the prototype of a host damaging cytokine.126–128 These results were supported by the observation that TNF injections lead to a septic like syndrome in mice.129 Infusion of anti-TNF antibodies in baboons protects from septic shock triggered by Escherichia coli infusion and LPS.130 In all these models TNFRI is essential in mediating TNF signalling since TNFRI-deficient mice are protected from LPS/D-GalN and Staphylococcus aureus superantigen/D-GalN-induced shock like syndromes.30 In other experimental models using concanvalin A (Con A) or Pseudomonas endotoxin A TNFRII signalling seems to be important for the host damaging effects.70,131 In accordance with clinical studies, animal models employing antagonists of host cytokines such as anti-TNF or TNFR:Ig decoy receptors and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) could not provide conclusive evidence for an improved survival in sepsis. Further animal models of abdominal sepsis, e.g. cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) both generating a septic focus and rapid invasion of gut bacteria into the blood stream and into solid organs have been put forward.132,133 CASP surgery employing TNFRI deficient mice revealed that the mortality rate does not differ when TNF signalling is mediated in the presence or absence of TNFRI; however, this model emphasized a beneficial role for IFN-γ in the survival of a polymicrobal sepsis.133 Studies employing the CLP model indicated that TNF is critically required for the survival in septic peritonitis.132 Furthermore, the interaction of endogenously produced TNF with TNFRII is needed for enhanced resistance to the bacterial challenge induced by CLP.134 In addition, after CLP a state of immunoparalysis characterized by a reduced capacity to produce TNF develops during which bacterial super-infections leads to increased lethality. Echtenacher and coworkers demonstrated in the CLP model that TNF substitution during the phase of immunoparalysis can be beneficial or deleterious, depending on the location of TNF activity, timing of TNF administration or the type of superinfection.135 From these results, the concept that TNF is solely host damaging has to be re-evaluated and future studies are required to analyse in more detail the molecular mechanisms in sepsis to define more targeted therapies.

Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Several members of the TNFR superfamily are important for the effective generation of a T-cell response. These molecules control the absolute number of effector T cells during an immune response and are further responsible for the frequency of memory T-cell generation. Growing evidence has shown that Ox40, CD27, and HVEM regulate the expression and survival of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells when stimulated by their cognate ligands.136 Ox40 expression is induced on activated T cells at the peak of the primary immune response.137,138 Activated T cells expressing Ox40 have been identified at various sites in a number of inflammatory diseases such as EAE,139 the lamina propria of mice undergoing colitis and biopsies from patients with CD,140,141 joints of mice with experimentally induced RA.142 Ox40 ligand (Ox40L) is expressed on APCs such as DCs, B cells and macrophages. Interestingly Ox40L is also expressed on activated endothelial cells in vitro and in the colon of patients with CD implying a role in promoting the migration of Ox40 expressing T cells to distant inflammatory sites and subsequently providing costimulatory signals.143,144 Studies employing Ox40- or Ox40L-deficient mice demonstrated that CD4+ T-cell responses during viral infections were markedly reduced in these animals.145 Similarly, transgenic expression of Ox40L on DCs led to an increased number of CD4+ T cells146 while blocking the Ox40L dramatically reduced the number of T cells.147 Interestingly, Ox40 deficient T cells demonstrated a reduced proliferation rate and could not survive over a long period of time.138 These studies suggest that the Ox40/Ox40L interaction controls the number of effector T cells in a primary immune response and allow these cells to survive, proliferate and differentiate in a late immune response.

CD27 is expressed on resting CD4+ and CD8+ resting T cells and is strongly up-regulated upon stimulation.148 The ligand for CD27 (CD27L) is also inducible on professional APCs, similar to OX40 ligand, although is has been detected predominantly on B cells rather than on DCs. Furthermore CD27L has been found on activated T cells implying that CD27/CD27L may be involved in direct costimmulation between subsets of T cells as well as between T cells and APCs.149

CD27-deficient mice have been shown to be defective in both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to viruses and the generation of specific memory T cells.150 These data are supported by results obtained with mice transgenic for CD27L expressed on B cells. These mice had increased numbers of memory and effector T cells.151

Expression studies have demonstrated that HVEM mRNA and protein is constitutively expressed on peripheral T and B lymphocytes, monocytes and immature DCs.152,153 In contrast LIGHT gene expression is regulated in an inducible manner on lymphocytes, natural killer cells and also on immature DCs.64,152

Initial studies implied that HVEM is involved in T-cell coactivation. The addition of anti-HVEM antibodies to activated T cells led to reduced T-cell proliferation and cytokine production,154 whereas the addition of soluble LIGHT in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) enhanced T-cell proliferation.155 Additional studies have shown that LIGHT–HVEM signalling seems to play a costimulatory role in TCR-mediated T-cell proliferation.65,156 Transgenic expression of human or mouse LIGHT results in inflammatory phenotypes, and enhanced Th1 cytokine production especially in the intestine.157 Recently, in a cardiac allograft rejection model, LIGHT has been further implicated as a regulator of allogenic T-cell activation and graft rejection155 indicating that the LIGHT–HVEM axis is involved in costimulation between different subsets of T cells.

Another type of costimulatory signal involving the LIGHT/LTα1β2 and LTβR axis has been reported recently by demonstrating that bone marrow derived mast cells (BMMC) express the LTβR. Employing BMMCs derived from wildtype or LTβR-deficient mice Stopfer and coworkers demonstrated the expression of LTβR, but not of HVEM, on BMMCs at mRNA as well as at protein level.158 BMMCs were found to release cytokines like TNF, IL-4, IL-6 and chemokines (e.g. MIP-2 and RANTES) in a LTβR-specific manner upon stimulation with either recombinant LIGHT, agonistic anti-LTβR mAbs or activated T cells expressing the corresponding ligands. These data clearly show that LTβR expressed on mast cells can transduce a costimulatory signal in T-cell dependent mast cell activation.158


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

There is compelling evidence derived from recent animal studies and corresponding clinical trials that neutralization of TNF increases disease activity in T-cell dependent and independent autoimmune diseases.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with anti-TNF mAb or soluble TNFR showed increased CNS lesions and disease activity.159–161 In the mouse model of EAE, TNF-deficiency results in the exacerbation of the disease as well as the failure of repression of T-cell reactivity.162 In the murine model of lupus using the (NZB×NZW)F1 mouse model anti-TNF or heterozygous TNF-deficiency is paralleled by earlier disease onset and increased severity.163,164 Several lines of evidence suggest that TNF levels inversely affect T-cell responsiveness and TCR signalling.165 In contrast blockade of TNF activity in patients with RA by anti-TNF or soluble TNFR antagonists results in a dramatic decrease in disease activity and in some cases a complete remission although disease recurs after cessation of the therapy.166 Anti-TNF therapy in CD results in a dramatic decrease in symptoms in up to 80% of the patients.167

Treatment of psoriasis patients with anti-TNF leads to the clearing of skin lesions and a decrease in associated arthritis incidents.94 It has been suggested that in these autoimmune diseases in which TNF blockade is therapeutic (as mentioned above) the overproduction of TNF and related cytokines is part of the innate immune response and is expressed by monocytes and macrophages rather than by T cells.168 Recent studies presented evidence that the LTβR and its ligands (LTα/β and/or LIGHT) and the interaction of LIGHT with HVEM are important for the function of T cells in their interaction with other T cells, B cells and APCs, thus playing a critical role in the development and maintenance of a normal immune response and in the development of autoimmune disease.

Blockade of LTβR activation by administration of LTβR:Ig or by transgenic overexpression prevents the clinical signs of diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice.169 Because binding of LIGHT to HVEM functions as a costimulatory receptor/ligand interaction and promotes T-cell proliferation as well as IFN-γ production soluble HVEM:Ig was used to interfere with LIGHT activation in vivo.156 These studies showed that HVEM:Ig was capable of down-regulating the T-cell response and furthermore was capable of significantly decreasing the development of diabetes in some NOD mice.170

Thus, it became clear that at least parts of the effects observed with LTβR:Ig are caused by the blockade of the LIGHT/HVEM interaction. A critical role for LTβ has further been implicated in the murine model of EAE.171 Furthermore, administration of LTβR:Ig ameliorated the signs of disease in experimental murine colitis models.106 A very recent report demonstrates that blocking LTβR activation diminishes inflammation via a reduced MAdCAM-1 expression and leucocyte margination in a murine model of chronic DSS-induced colitis.108

From these results it is clear that LTβR blockade will have multiple effects. It can thus be envisioned that the interference with LTβR activation (1) decreases the expression of adhesins and integrins, (2) interferes with the development of natural killer cells, dendritic APCs, and FDC formation, and (3) prevents a normal localization and interaction of T cells, B cells, and APCs.

A more detailed analysis of the mechanisms accompanied by the blockade of LTα/β and LIGHT on the function of T and B cells as well as their interaction with other cells types (e.g. FDCs and APCs) may lead to alternative methods for down-regulating the immune response in autoimmune diseases.

Because studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's syndrome revealed elevated BAFF serum levels correlating with elevated levels of autoreactive immunoglobulins, BAFF represents an appropriate target for intervention in autoimmune disease since elevated levels of autoantibodies contribute to disease pathology.172

BAFF and APRIL are members of the TNF superfamily that modulate B-cell activation, survival and development.173–175 Transgenic overexpression of BAFF results in the expansion of mature B2 and B1 B cells in the spleen and in symptoms of autoimmune disease similar to SLE and Sjögren's syndrome. In BAFF-deficient mice B-cell development is blocked at the transitional B1 stage resulting in the deficiency of mature B cells paralleled by reduced IgM and IgG serum levels. Interestingly, thymocyte populations and peripheral CD3+ T-cell subpopulations seem not to be affected by BAFF-deficency.176

Both BAFF and APRIL bind to TACI which is expressed on B cells and activated T cells as well as to BCMA, which is only expressed on B cells. In vivo TACI:Ig can inhibit the level of circulating B220+ B cells, the production of antibodies to a T-cell dependent antigen and the spontaneous development of SLE.175,177 TACI:Ig treatment further inhibits both the production of collagen-specific antibodies and the progression of disease in a mouse model of RA. In addition to B cells, BAFF promoted T-cell activation possibly via increased cell survival mediated by BAFF receptor expressed on effector T cells.178 Therefore, the role of BAFF in autoimmune disease appears to be a combined effect of suppressed B-cell survival and perturbed T-cell activation.179

Recent studies have implicated CD30, originally identified as a cell surface antigen on Hodgkin and Reed–Steinberg cells in regulation of inflammatory responses.180,181 A recent report suggested CD30 as a possible candidate for a diabetes-susceptible gene (Idd9) in NOD mice.182 Administration of neutralizing anti-CD30 mAb completely suppressed the development of spontaneous diabetes in these mice. Additionally, the treatment with anti-CD30 ligand (CD30L) mAb also inhibited the development of diabetes induced by adoptive transfer of spleen cells from diabetic NOD mice into NOD–SCID mice. These results suggest that CD30/CD30L interaction plays important roles in both induction and effector phase of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.183

While CD30L is expressed on activated T-cells, neutrophils, eosinophils and resting B-cells the receptor is not only expressed on activated T- and B-cells but also on certain Treg cell populations.184 Previous results have demonstrated that TCR activation is required for Treg cells to become suppressive but that costimulatoy interactions by other members of the TNFR superfamily (e.g. Ox40/Ox40L, and 4-1BB/4-1BBL) are not critically involved.185 A recent study employing CD30-deficient mice and blocking anti-CD30L mAb demonstrated that CD30/CD30L interaction is critical for the ability of Treg cells to suppress allograft rejection and induce enhanced CD8+ T-cell apoptosis in an allograft rejection model.186 These results identified CD30/CD30L as molecules required for the regulation of memory T-cell responses that are involved in a variety of autoimmune disease pathogenesis.

Very recently it has been demonstrated that the glucocorticoid-induced TNF related protein (GITR), which is constitutively expressed on the surface of Treg cells, provides signals that abrogates Treg suppression. Removal of GITR expressing T cells or administration of anti-GITR mAb produced organ specific autoimmune disease.187 Further studies have shown evidence that CD4+ GITR+ T-cells regulate the mucosal immune response and intestinal inflammation. SCID mice restored with CD4+/GITR-deficient T cells developed wasting disease and severe colitis, while cotransfer of the CD4+/GITR+ T-cell population prevented the development of classical CD4+ CD45RBhigh T-cell transferred colitis. Additionally the administration of anti-GITR mAb induced chronic colitis in this model.188

Further evidence that GITR regulate the Treg responsiveness is given by the observation that anti GITR mAb treatment of SJL mice with EAE significantly exacerbated clinical disease severity, and CNS inflammation, paralleled by elevated levels of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.189 Studies using a recombinant soluble form of GITR-ligand (GITRL) which is naturally expressed as a membrane bound form on the cell surface of APCs, such as dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells but not on T cells demonstrated that stimulation of GITR by GITRL abrogates Treg suppression by inducing NF-κB activation and subsequent IL-2 production.190 These findings demonstrate that GITR both turns off Treg cells and costimulates conventional T-cells. It is therefore tempting to speculate on the phenotype of GITR or GITRL transgenes or deficient-mice. Using these mice in several animal models will certainly give answers to the question whether deregulated expression of GITRL contributes to the development in autoimmune diseases. The role of TNF/TNFR superfamily members in models of autoimmune diseases based on studies using gene targeted mice are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.  Role of TNF/TNFR superfamily in autoimmunity based on studies using gene targeted mice
Targeted geneT/B homeostasisAutoimmunityReferences
  1. ND, not determined.

Ox40Impaired T cell stimulationND221
Antigen-presentation impairedND222
Pathogenic Th2 cell responseND223
NDCritical involvement in EAE224
NDControls lung inflammation225, 226
NDEnhanced CHS reactions227
CD30Elevated numbers of T cellsImpaired neg. selection228
NDLess severe GVHD229
NDIncreased autoreactivity229
NDRapid onset of diabetes230, 231
4-1BBNDIncreases allograft survival232
Enhanced T-cell proliferationND233
LIGHTDefect in T-cell activationND65
APRILNormalImpaired IgA class switch75, 213
BAFF/BAFFRLoss of mature B cellsND234
RANK/RANKLB-cell deficiencyOsteopetrosis58, 118
TACIB-cell accumulationND177, 235
DR3Impaired negative selectionND236
FAS/FASLImpaired negative selectionLupus erythematosus237
NDAutoimmune diabetes238
NDDiminished EAE disease240
Autoantibody productionND224
NDCerulein-induced pancreatitis241
NDAutoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS)242
NDInduction of allograft tolerance243


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References

Collectively, the members of the TNF/TNFR superfamily play important roles in organogenesis and the maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture (Table 1). Additionally, the receptor ligand interactions within this superfamily have been demonstrated to be essential in host defence mechanisms and the control of inflammatory processes. On the other hand, dysregulation of this family of cytokines results in a general paralysis of the immune response leading to the pathophysiological conditions of exacerbated and chronic inflammation and septic shock syndromes. Recent studies have established the members of this superfamily as mediators in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis and lupus-like syndromes. The future challenges will be translating the basis results that have been obtained from studies in animal models into the appropriate clinical therapy. The improvement of animal models will also be essential in order to gain more detailed insight into the complex regulation and diverse activities of the members of the TNF superfamily and their receptors.

During the preparation of this review HVEM has been identified as a unique ligand for the B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA).191


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modes of signalling
  5. Organogenesis and maintenance of lymphoid microarchitecture
  6. Host defence
  7. Inflammation
  8. Sepsis
  9. Costimulatory signals from TNFR superfamily members
  10. Autoimmunity
  11. Conclusions
  12. References
  • 1
    Aggarwal BB, Schwarz L, Hogan ME, Rando RF. Triple helix-forming oligodeoxyribonucleotides targeted to the human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) gene inhibit TNF production and block the TNF-dependent growth of human glioblastoma tumor cells. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 515664.
  • 2
    Granger GA, Shacks SJ, Williams TW, Kolb WP. Lymphocyte in vitro cytotoxicity. specific release of lymphotoxin-like materials from tuberculin-sensitive lymphoid cells. Nature 1969; 221: 11557.
  • 3
    Helson L, Green S, Carswell E, Old LJ. Effect of tumour necrosis factor on cultured human melanoma cells. Nature 1975; 258: 7312.
  • 4
    Beutler B, Cerami A. Cachectin/tumor necrosis factor: an endogenous mediator of shock and inflammation. Immunol Res 1986; 5: 28193.
  • 5
    Locksley RM, Killeen N, Lenardo MJ. The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies: integrating mammalian biology. Cell 2001; 104: 487501.
  • 6
    Peschon JJ, Slack JL, Reddy P et al. An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science 1998; 282: 12814.
  • 7
    Eck MJ, Sprang SR. The structure of tumor necrosis factor-alpha at 2.6 A resolution. Implications for receptor binding. J Biol Chem 1989; 264: 17595605.
  • 8
    Loetscher H, Stueber D, Banner D, Mackay F, Lesslauer W. Human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) mutants with exclusive specificity for the 55-kDa or 75-kDa TNF receptors. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 263507.
  • 9
    Fesik SW. Insights into programmed cell death through structural biology. Cell 2000; 103: 27382.
  • 10
    Idriss HT, Naismith JH. TNF alpha and the TNF receptor superfamily: structure–function relationship(s). Microsc Res Techn 2000; 50: 18495.
  • 11
    Smith CA, Farrah T, Goodwin RG. The TNF receptor superfamily of cellular and viral proteins. activation, costimulation, and death. Cell 1994; 76: 95962.
  • 12
    Chan FK, Chun HJ, Zheng L, Siegel RM, Bui KL, Lenardo MJ. A domain in TNF receptors that mediates ligand-independent receptor assembly and signaling. Science 2000; 288: 23514.
  • 13
    Hehlgans T, Mannel DN. The TNF-TNF receptor system. Biol Chem 2002; 383: 15815.
  • 14
    Seitz C, Muller P, Krieg RC, Mannel DN, Hehlgans T. A novel p75TNF receptor isoform mediating NFkappa B activation. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 193905.
  • 15
    Eissner G, Kirchner S, Lindner H et al. Reverse signaling through transmembrane TNF confers resistance to lipopolysaccharide in human monocytes and macrophages. J Immunol 2000; 164: 61938.
  • 16
    Eissner G, Kolch W, Scheurich P. Ligands working as receptors. reverse signaling by members of the TNF superfamily enhance the plasticity of the immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004; 15: 35366.
  • 17
    Dempsey PW, Doyle SE, He JQ, Cheng G. The signaling adaptors and pathways activated by TNF superfamily. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003; 14: 193209.
  • 18
    Chinnaiyan AM, Tepper CG, Seldin MF et al. FADD/MORT1 is a common mediator of CD95 (Fas/APO-1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 49615.
  • 19
    Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Chuntharapai A, Schow P, Kim KJ, Ashkenazi A. Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity 2000; 12: 61120.
  • 20
    Legler DF, Micheau O, Doucey MA, Tschopp J, Bron C. Recruitment of TNF receptor 1 to lipid rafts is essential for TNFalpha-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Immunity 2003; 18: 65564.
  • 21
    Micheau O, Tschopp J. Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell 2003; 114: 18190.
  • 22
    Stanger BZ, Leder P, Lee TH, Kim E, Seed B. RIP. a novel protein containing a death domain that interacts with Fas/APO-1 (CD95) in yeast and causes cell death. Cell 1995; 81: 51323.
  • 23
    Hsu H, Huang J, Shu HB, Baichwal V, Goeddel DV. TNF-dependent recruitment of the protein kinase RIP to the TNF receptor-1 signaling complex. Immunity 1996; 4: 38796.
  • 24
    Kelliher MA, Grimm S, Ishida Y, Kuo F, Stanger BZ, Leder P. The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-kappaB signal. Immunity 1998; 8: 297303.
  • 25
    Yeh WC, Shahinian A, Speiser D et al. Early lethality, functional NF-kappaB activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice. Immunity 1997; 7: 71525.
  • 26
    Krippner-Heidenreich A, Tubing F, Bryde S, Willi S, Zimmermann G, Scheurich P. Control of receptor-induced signaling complex formation by the kinetics of ligand/receptor interaction. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 4415563.
  • 27
    Jiang Y, Woronicz JD, Liu W, Goeddel DV. Prevention of constitutive TNF receptor 1 signaling by silencer of death domains. Science 1999; 283: 5436.
  • 28
    Lee ZH, Kwack K, Kim KK, Lee SH, Kim HH. Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and activator protein 1 by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB. Mol Pharmacol 2000; 58: 153645.
  • 29
    Endres R, Luz A, Schulze H, Neubauer H, Futterer A, Holland SM, Wagner H, Pfeffer K. Listeriosis in p47 (phox–/–) and TRp55–/– mice: protection despite absence of ROI and susceptibility despite presence of RNI. Immunity 1997; 7: 41932.
  • 30
    Pfeffer K, Matsuyama T, Kundig TM et al. Mice deficient for the 55 kd tumor necrosis factor receptor are resistant to endotoxic shock, yet succumb to L. monocytogenes infection. Cell 1993; 73: 45767.
  • 31
    Endres R, Hacker G, Brosch I, Pfeffer K. Apparently normal tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 signaling in the absence of the silencer of death domains. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 660917.
  • 32
    Roy N, Deveraux QL, Takahashi R, Salvesen GS, Reed JC. The c-IAP-1 and c-IAP-2 proteins are direct inhibitors of specific caspases. EMBO J 1997; 16: 691425.
  • 33
    Uren AG, Pakusch M, Hawkins CJ, Puls KL, Vaux DL. Cloning and expression of apoptosis inhibitory protein homologs that function to inhibit apoptosis and/or bind tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 49748.
  • 34
    Suzuki Y, Nakabayashi Y, Nakata K, Reed JC, Takahashi R. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) inhibits caspase-3 and -7 in distinct modes. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 2705863.
  • 35
    Wang CY, Mayo MW, Korneluk RG, Goeddel DV, Baldwin AS Jr. NF-kappaB antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science 1998; 281: 16803.
  • 36
    Grech A, Quinn R, Srinivasan D., Badoux X, Brink R. Complete structural characterisation of the mammalian and Drosophila TRAF genes: implications for TRAF evolution and the role of RING finger splice variants. Mol Immunol 2000; 37: 72134.
  • 37
    Cao Z, Xiong J, Takeuchi M, Kurama T, Goeddel DV. TRAF6 is a signal transducer for interleukin-1. Nature 1996; 383: 4436.
  • 38
    Rothe J, Mackay F, Bluethmann H, Zinkernagel R, Lesslauer W. Phenotypic analysis of TNFR1-deficient mice and characterization of TNFR1-deficient fibroblasts in vitro. Circ Shock 1994; 44: 516.
  • 39
    Darnay BG, Haridas V, Ni J, Moore PA, Aggarwal BB. Characterization of the intracellular domain of receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK). Interaction with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors and activation of NF-kappab and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 205515.
  • 40
    Darnay BG, Ni J, Moore PA, Aggarwal BB. Activation of NF-kappaB by RANK requires tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 6 and NF-kappaB-inducing kinase. Identification of a novel TRAF6 interaction motif. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 772431.
  • 41
    Malinin NL, Boldin MP, Kovalenko AV, Wallach D. MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF-kappaB induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1. Nature 1997; 385: 5404.
  • 42
    Yin L, Wu L, Wesche H, Arthur CD, White JM, Goeddel DV, Schreiber RD. Defective lymphotoxin-beta receptor-induced NF-kappaB transcriptional activity in NIK-deficient mice. Science 2001; 291: 21625.
  • 43
    Luftig MA, Cahir-McFarland E, Mosialos G, Kieff E. Effects of the NIK aly mutation on NF-kappaB activation by the Epstein-Barr virus latent infection membrane protein, lymphotoxin beta receptor, and CD40. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 146026.
  • 44
    Schneider-Brachert W, Tchikov V, Neumeyer J et al. Compartmentalization of TNF receptor 1 signaling: internalized TNF receptosomes as death signaling vesicles. Immunity 2004; 21: 41528.
  • 45
    Saitoh T, Nakano H, Yamamoto N, Yamaoka S. Lymphotoxin-beta receptor mediates NEMO-independent NF-kappaB activation. FEBS Lett 2002; 532: 4551.
  • 46
    Elewaut D, Shaikh RB, Hammond KJ et al. NIK-dependent RelB activation defines a unique signaling pathway for the development of V alpha 14i NKT cells. J Exp Med 2003; 197: 162333.
  • 47
    Ghosh S, Karin M. Missing pieces in the NF-kappaB puzzle. Cell 2002; 109(Suppl. ):S81S96.
  • 48
    Senftleben U, Karin M. The IKK/NF-kappa B pathway. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: S18S26.
  • 49
    Dejardin E, Droin NM, Delhase M et al. The lymphotoxin-beta receptor induces different patterns of gene expression via two NF-kappaB pathways. Immunity 2002; 17: 52535.
  • 50
    Futterer A, Mink K, Luz A, Kosco-Vilbois MH, Pfeffer K. The lymphotoxin beta receptor controls organogenesis and affinity maturation in peripheral lymphoid tissues. Immunity 1998; 9: 5970.
  • 51
    Fu YX, Chaplin DD. Development and maturation of secondary lymphoid tissues. Annu Rev Immunol 1999; 17: 399433.
  • 52
    Tumanov AV, Kuprash DV, Nedospasov SA. The role of lymphotoxin in development and maintenance of secondary lymphoid tissues. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003; 14: 27588.
  • 53
    Mebius RE, Rennert P, Weissman IL. Developing lymph nodes collect CD4+ CD3 LTbeta+ cells that can differentiate to APC, NK cells, and follicular cells but not T or B cells. Immunity 1997; 7: 493504.
  • 54
    Yoshida H, Kawamoto H, Santee SM et al. Expression of alpha (4) beta (7) integrin defines a distinct pathway of lymphoid progenitors committed to T cells, fetal intestinal lymphotoxin producer, NK, and dendritic cells. J Immunol 2001; 167: 251121.
  • 55
    Ansel KM, Cyster JG. Chemokines in lymphopoiesis and lymphoid organ development. Curr Opin Immunol 2001; 13: 1729.
  • 56
    Nishikawa S, Honda K, Vieira P, Yoshida H. Organogenesis of peripheral lymphoid organs. Immunol Rev 2003; 195: 7280.
  • 57
    Yoshida H, Naito A, Inoue J et al. Different cytokines induce surface lymphotoxin-alphabeta on IL-7 receptor-alpha cells that differentially engender lymph nodes and Peyer's patches. Immunity 2002; 17: 82333.
  • 58
    Dougall WC, Glaccum M, Charrier K et al. RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 241224.
  • 59
    Matsumoto M, Fu YX, Molina H, Chaplin DD. Lymphotoxin-alpha-deficient and TNF receptor-I-deficient mice define developmental and functional characteristics of germinal centers. Immunol Rev 1997; 156: 13744.
  • 60
    Rennert PD, Browning JL, Mebius R, Mackay F, Hochman PS. Surface lymphotoxin alpha/beta complex is required for the development of peripheral lymphoid organs. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 19992006.
  • 61
    Rennert PD, Browning JL, Hochman PS. Selective disruption of lymphotoxin ligands reveals a novel set of mucosal lymph nodes and unique effects on lymph node cellular organization. Int Immunol 1997; 9: 162739.
  • 62
    Ettinger R, Browning JL, Michie SA, Van Ewijk W, McDevitt HO. Disrupted splenic architecture, but normal lymph node development in mice expressing a soluble lymphotoxin-beta receptor-IgG1 fusion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 131027.
  • 63
    Rennert PD, James D, Mackay F, Browning JL, Hochman PS. Lymph node genesis is induced by signaling through the lymphotoxin beta receptor. Immunity 1998; 9: 719.
  • 64
    Mauri DN, Ebner R, Montgomery RI et al. LIGHT, a new member of the TNF superfamily, and lymphotoxin alpha are ligands for herpesvirus entry mediator. Immunity 1998; 8: 2130.
  • 65
    Scheu S, Alferink J, Potzel T, Barchet W, Kalinke U, Pfeffer K. Targeted disruption of LIGHT causes defects in costimulatory T cell activation and reveals cooperation with lymphotoxin beta in mesenteric lymph node genesis. J Exp Med 2002; 195: 161324.
  • 66
    Adachi S, Yoshida H, Kataoka H, Nishikawa S. Three distinctive steps in Peyer's patch formation of murine embryo. Int Immunol 1997; 9: 50714.
  • 67
    Aggarwal BB, Natarajan K. Tumor necrosis factors: developments during the last decade. Eur Cytokine Netw 1996; 7: 93124.
  • 68
    Endres R, Alimzhanov MB, Plitz T, Futterer A, Kosco-Vilbois MH, Nedospasov SA, Rajewsky K, Pfeffer K. Mature follicular dendritic cell networks depend on expression of lymphotoxin beta receptor by radioresistant stromal cells and of lymphotoxin beta and tumor necrosis factor by B cells. J Exp Med 1999; 189: 15968.
  • 69
    Tumanov AV, Grivennikov SI, Shakhov AN, Rybtsov SA, Koroleva EP, Takeda J, Nedospasov SA, Kuprash DV. Dissecting the role of lymphotoxin in lymphoid organs by conditional targeting. Immunol Rev 2003; 195: 10616.
  • 70
    Kusters S, Tiegs G, Alexopoulou L et al. In vivo evidence for a functional role of both tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors and transmembrane TNF in experimental hepatitis. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27: 28705.
  • 71
    Nedospasov SA. [Tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin. molecular genetics, regulation and physiological role]. Genetika 2003; 39: 20714.
  • 72
    Grewal IS, Flavell RA. A central role of CD40 ligand in the regulation of CD4+ T-cell responses. Immunol Today 1996; 17: 4104.
  • 73
    Van Kooten C, Banchereau J. Functional role of CD40 and its ligand. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1997; 113: 3939.
  • 74
    Stuber E, Strober W. The T cell–B cell interaction via OX40-OX40L is necessary for the T cell-dependent humoral immune response. J Exp Med 1996; 183: 97989.
  • 75
    Castigli E, Scott S, Dedeoglu F, Bryce P, Jabara H, Bhan AK, Mizoguchi E, Geha RS. Impaired IgA class switching in APRIL-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 39038.
  • 76
    Kato K, Nakane A, Minagawa T, Kasai N, Yamamoto K, Sato N, Tsuruoka N. Human tumor necrosis factor increases the resistance against Listeria infection in mice. Med Immunol (Berl) 1989; 178: 33746.
  • 77
    Nakane A, Minagawa T, Kato K. Endogenous tumor necrosis factor (cachectin) is essential to host resistance against Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect Immun 1988; 56: 25639.
  • 78
    Blanchard DK, Serbousek D, Djeu JY. Induction of human monocyte susceptibility to lymphokine-activated killer cell lysis by granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 503743.
  • 79
    Hauser T, Frei K, Zinkernagel RM, Leist TP. Role of tumor necrosis factor in Listeria resistance of nude mice. Med Immunol (Berl) 1990; 179: 95104.
  • 80
    Ehlers S, Holscher C, Scheu S, Tertilt C, Hehlgans T, Suwinski J, Endres R, Pfeffer K. The lymphotoxin beta receptor is critically involved in controlling infections with the intracellular pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol 2003; 170: 52108.
  • 81
    Serbina NV, Salazar-Mather TP, Biron CA, Kuziel WA, Pamer EG. TNF/iNOS-producing dendritic cells mediate innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Immunity 2003; 19: 5970.
  • 82
    Nashleanas M, Kanaly S, Scott P. Control of Leishmania major infection in mice lacking TNF receptors. J Immunol 1998; 160: 550613.
  • 83
    Castanos-Velez E, Maerlan S, Osorio LM, Aberg F, Biberfeld P, Orn A, Rottenberg ME. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in tumor necrosis factor receptor p55-deficient mice. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 29608.
  • 84
    Deckert-Schluter M. [Rudolf-Virchow Prize 1998: Award lecture. Toxoplasmosis: a model infection for studying systemic and intracerebral immune reactions]. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 1998; 82: 922.
  • 85
    Wright TW, Pryhuber GS, Chess PR, Wang Z, Notter RH, Gigliotti F. TNF receptor signaling contributes to chemokine secretion, inflammation, and respiratory deficits during Pneumocystis pneumonia. J Immunol 2004; 172: 251121.
  • 86
    Ehlers S. Role of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in host defence against tuberculosis: implications for immunotherapies targeting TNF. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62(Suppl. 2):ii37-ii42.
  • 87
    Bekker LG, Freeman S, Murray PJ, Ryffel B, Kaplan G. TNF-alpha controls intracellular mycobacterial growth by both inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent and inducible nitric oxide synthase-independent pathways. J Immunol 2001; 166: 672834.
  • 88
    Roach DR, Bean AG, Demangel C, France MP, Briscoe H, Britton WJ. TNF regulates chemokine induction essential for cell recruitment, granuloma formation, and clearance of mycobacterial infection. J Immunol 2002; 168: 46207.
  • 89
    Bean AG, Roach DR, Briscoe H, France MP, Korner H, Sedgwick JD, Britton WJ. Structural deficiencies in granuloma formation in TNF gene-targeted mice underlie the heightened susceptibility to aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, which is not compensated for by lymphotoxin. J Immunol 1999; 162: 350411.
  • 90
    Ehlers S, Kutsch S, Ehlers EM, Benini J, Pfeffer K. Lethal granuloma disintegration in mycobacteria-infected TNFRp55–/– mice is dependent on T cells and IL-12. J Immunol 2000; 165: 48392.
  • 91
    Roach DR, Martin E, Bean AG, Rennick DM, Briscoe H, Britton WJ. Endogenous inhibition of antimycobacterial immunity by IL-10 varies between mycobacterial species. Scand J Immunol 2001; 54: 16370.
  • 92
    Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB. Infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease: a user's guide for clinicians. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 296272.
    Direct Link:
  • 93
    Keating GM, Perry CM. Infliximab: an updated review of its use in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Biodrugs 2002; 16: 11148.
  • 94
    Chaudhari U, Romano P, Mulcahy LD, Dooley LT, Baker DG, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and safety of infliximab monotherapy for plaque-type psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 18427.
  • 95
    Reimold AM. New indications for treatment of chronic inflammation by TNF-alpha blockade. Am J Med Sci 2003; 325: 7592.
  • 96
    Weisman MH. What are the risks of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis? An update on safety. J Rheumatol Supplement 2002; 65: 338.
  • 97
    Lucas R, Juillard P, Decoster E et al. rucial role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2 and membrane-bound TNF in experimental cerebral malaria. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27: 171925.
  • 98
    Stoelcker B, Hehlgans T, Weigl K, Bluethmann H, Grau GE, Mannel DN. Requirement for tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 expression on vascular cells to induce experimental cerebral malaria. Infect Immun 2002; 70: 58579.
  • 99
    Lucas R, Tacchini-Cottier F, Guler R et al. A role for lymphotoxin beta receptor in host defense against Mycobacterium bovis BCG infection. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29: 400210.
  • 100
    Ono E, Yoshino S, Amagai K et al. Enhanced resistance to herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in transgenic mice expressing a soluble form of herpesvirus entry mediator. Virology 2004; 320: 26775.
  • 101
    Malik ST, Balkwill FR. Antiproliferative and antitumor activity of TNF in vitro and in vivo. Immunol Series 1992; 56: 23968.
  • 102
    Clauss M, Sunderkotter C, Sveinbjornsson B et al. A permissive role for tumor necrosis factor in vascular endothelial growth factor-induced vascular permeability. Blood 2001; 97: 13219.
  • 103
    Piguet PF, Grau GE, Vesin C, Loetscher H, Gentz R, Lesslauer W. Evolution of collagen arthritis in mice is arrested by treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibody or a recombinant soluble TNF receptor. Immunology 1992; 77: 5104.
  • 104
    Elson CO, Sartor RB, Tennyson GS, Riddell RH. Experimental models of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 134467.
  • 105
    Powrie F, Leach MW, Mauze S, Menon S, Caddle LB, Coffman RL. Inhibition of Th1 responses prevents inflammatory bowel disease in scid mice reconstituted with CD45RBhi CD4+ T cells. Immunity 1994; 1: 55362.
  • 106
    Mackay F, Browning JL, Lawton P et al. Both the lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis factor pathways are involved in experimental murine models of colitis. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 146475.
  • 107
    Dohi T, Rennert PD, Fujihashi K, Kiyono H, Shirai Y, Kawamura YI, Browning JL, McGhee JR. Elimination of colonic patches with lymphotoxin beta receptor-Ig prevents Th2 cell-type colitis. J Immunol 2001; 167: 278190.
  • 108
    Stopfer P, Obermeier F, Dunger N et al. Blocking lymphotoxin-beta receptor activation diminishes inflammation via reduced mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) expression and leucocyte margination in chronic DSS-induced colitis. Clin Exp Immunol 2004; 136: 219.
  • 109
    Stuber E, Strober W, Neurath M. Blocking the CD40L–CD40 interaction in vivo specifically prevents the priming of T helper 1 cells through the inhibition of interleukin 12 secretion. J Exp Med 1996; 183: 6938.
  • 110
    Danese S, Sans M, Fiocchi C. The CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2004; 53: 103543.
  • 111
    Maerten P, Liu Z, Ceuppens JL. Targeting of costimulatory molecules as a therapeutic approach in inflammatory bowel disease. Biodrugs 2003; 17: 395411.
  • 112
    Prehn JL, Mehdizadeh S, Landers CJ, Luo X, Cha SC, Wei P, Targan SR. Potential role for TL1A, the new TNF-family member and potent costimulator of IFN-gamma, in mucosal inflammation. Clin Immunol 2004; 112: 6677.
  • 113
    Wang Y, Zhao MH, Zhang YK, Li XM, Wang HY. Binding capacity and pathophysiological effects of IgA1 from patients with IgA nephropathy on human glomerular mesangial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2004; 136: 16875.
  • 114
    Fava RA, Notidis E, Hunt J, Szanya V, Ratcliffe N, Ngam-ek A, De Fougerolles AR, Sprague A, Browning JL. A role for the lymphotoxin/LIGHT axis in the pathogenesis of murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol 2003; 171: 11526.
  • 115
    Terato K, Harper DS, Griffiths MM, Hasty DLYeXJ, Cremer MA, Seyer JM. Collagen-induced arthritis in mice. synergistic effect of E. coli lipopolysaccharide bypasses epitope specificity in the induction of arthritis with monoclonal antibodies to type II collagen. Autoimmunity 1995; 22: 13747.
  • 116
    De Fougerolles AR, Sprague AG, Nickerson-Nutter CL et al. egulation of inflammation by collagen-binding integrins alpha1beta1 and alpha2beta1 in models of hypersensitivity and arthritis. J Clin Invest 2000; 105: 7219.
  • 117
    Wang H, Marsters SA, Baker T et al. CI–ligand interactions are required for T cell activation and collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 6327.
  • 118
    Saidenberg-Kermanac'h N, Cohen-Solal M, Bessis N, De Vernejoul MC, Boissier MC. Role for osteoprotegerin in rheumatoid inflammation. Joint Bone Spine 2004; 71: 913.
  • 119
    Suvannavejh GC, Lee HO, Padilla J, Dal Canto MC, Barrett TA, Miller SD. Divergent roles for p55 and p75 tumor necrosis factor receptors in the pathogenesis of MOG (35-55)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Cell Immunol 2000; 205: 2433.
  • 120
    Peschon JJ, Torrance DS, Stocking KL et al. TNF receptor-deficient mice reveal divergent roles for p55 and p75 in several models of inflammation. J Immunol 1998; 160: 94352.
  • 121
    Zanotti S, Kumar A, Kumar A. Cytokine modulation in sepsis and septic shock. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2002; 11: 106175.
  • 122
    Sharma VK, Dellinger RP. Recent developments in the treatment of sepsis. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2003; 12: 13952.
  • 123
    Lindsay JO, Sandison A, Cohen P, Brennan FM, Hodgson HJ. IL-10 gene therapy is therapeutic for dextran sodium sulfate-induced murine colitis. Dig Dis Sci 2004; 49: 132734.
  • 124
    Egger B, Procaccino F, Lakshmanan J et al. Mice lacking transforming growth factor alpha have an increased susceptibility to dextran sulfate-induced colitis. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 82532.
  • 125
    Kitani A, Fuss I, Nakamura K, Kumaki F, Usui T, Strober W. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1-producing regulatory T cells induce Smad-mediated interleukin 10 secretion that facilitates coordinated immunoregulatory activity and amelioration of TGF-beta1-mediated fibrosis. J Exp Med 2003; 198: 117988.
  • 126
    Vassalli P. The pathophysiology of tumor necrosis factors. Annu Rev Immunol 1992; 10: 41152.
  • 127
    Tartaglia LA, Rothe M, Hu YF, Goeddel DV. Tumor necrosis factor's cytotoxic activity is signaled by the p55 TNF receptor. Cell 1993; 73: 2136.
  • 128
    Rietschel ET, Brade H, Holst O et al. Bacterial endotoxin: Chemical constitution, biological recognition, host response, and immunological detoxification. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1996; 216: 3981.
  • 129
    Tracey KJ, Beutler B, Lowry SF et al. Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin. Science 1986; 234: 4704.
  • 130
    Tracey KJ, Fong Y, Hesse DG, Manogue KR, Lee AT, Kuo GC, Lowry SF, Cerami A. Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia. Nature 1987; 330: 6624.
  • 131
    Schumann J, Angermuller S, Bang R, Lohoff M, Tiegs G. Acute hepatotoxicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A in mice depends on T cells and TNF. J Immunol 1998; 161: 574554.
  • 132
    Echtenacher B, Hultner L, Mannel DN. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of TNF protection in septic peritonitis. J Inflamm 1995; 47: 859.
  • 133
    Zantl N, Uebe A, Neumann B, Wagner H, Siewert JR, Holzmann B, Heidecke CD, Pfeffer K. Essential role of gamma interferon in survival of colon ascendens stent peritonitis, a novel murine model of abdominal sepsis. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 23009.
  • 134
    Echtenacher B, Mannel DN. Requirement of TNF and TNF receptor type 2 for LPS-induced protection from lethal septic peritonitis. J Endotoxin Res 2002; 8: 3659.
  • 135
    Echtenacher B, Urbaschek R, Weigl K, Freudenberg MA, Mannel DN. Treatment of experimental sepsis-induced immunoparalysis with TNF. Immunobiology 2003; 208: 3819.
  • 136
    Croft M. Costimulation of T cells by OX40, 4-1BB, and CD27. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003; 14: 26573.
  • 137
    Strober S, Cheng L, Zeng D, Palathumpat R, Dejbakhsh-Jones S, Huie P, Sibley R. Double negative (CD4 CD8 alpha beta+) T cells which promote tolerance induction and regulate autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 1996; 149: 21730.
  • 138
    Rogers PR, Song J, Gramaglia I, Killeen N, Croft M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity 2001; 15: 44555.
  • 139
    Weinberg AD, Celnik B, Vainiene M, Buenafe AC, Vandenbark AA, Offner H. The effect of TCR V beta 8 peptide protection and therapy on T cell populations isolated from the spinal cords of Lewis rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 1994; 49: 16170.
  • 140
    Higgins LM, McDonald SA, Whittle N, Crockett N, Shields JG, MacDonald TT. Regulation of T cell activation in vitro and in vivo by targeting the OX40–OX40 ligand interaction: amelioration of ongoing inflammatory bowel disease with an OX40–IgG fusion protein, but not with an OX40 ligand–IgG fusion protein. J Immunol 1999; 162: 48693.
  • 141
    Stuber E, Buschenfeld A, Luttges J, Von Freier A, Arendt T, Folsch UR. The expression of OX40 in immunologically mediated diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (celiac disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis). Eur J Clin Invest 2000; 30: 5949.
  • 142
    Yoshioka T, Nakajima A, Akiba H, Ishiwata T, Asano G, Yoshino S, Yagita H, Okumura K. Contribution of OX40/OX40 ligand interaction to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Immunol 2000; 30: 281523.
  • 143
    Imura A, Hori T, Imada K, Ishikawa T, Tanaka Y, Maeda M, Imamura S, Uchiyama T. The human OX40/gp34 system directly mediates adhesion of activated T cells to vascular endothelial cells. J Exp Med 1996; 183: 218595.
  • 144
    Souza HS, Elia CC, Spencer J, MacDonald TT. Expression of lymphocyte-endothelial receptor-ligand pairs, alpha4beta7/MAdCAM-1 and OX40/OX40 ligand in the colon and jejunum of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1999; 45: 85663.
  • 145
    Kopf M, Ruedl C, Schmitz N, Gallimore A, Lefrang K, Ecabert B, Odermatt B, Bachmann MF. OX40-deficient mice are defective in Th cell proliferation but are competent in generating B cell and CTL responses after virus infection. Immunity 1999; 11: 699708.
  • 146
    Brocker T. The role of dendritic cells in T cell selection and survival. J Leukoc Biol 1999; 66: 3315.
  • 147
    Walker LS, Gulbranson-Judge A, Flynn S et al. Compromised OX40 function in CD28-deficient mice is linked with failure to develop CXC chemokine receptor 5-positive CD4 cells and germinal centers. J Exp Med 1999; 190: 111522.
  • 148
    Hintzen RQ, De Jong R, Lens SM, Brouwer M, Baars P, Van Lier RA. Regulation of CD27 expression on subsets of mature T-lymphocytes. J Immunol 1993; 151: 242635.
  • 149
    Oshima H, Nakano H, Nohara C et al. Characterization of murine CD70 by molecular cloning and mAb. Int Immunol 1998; 10: 51726.
  • 150
    Hendriks J, Gravestein LA, Tesselaar K, Van Lier RA, Schumacher TN, Borst J. CD27 is required for generation and long-term maintenance of T cell immunity. Nat Immunol 2000; 1: 43340.
  • 151
    Arens R, Tesselaar K, Baars PA et al. Constitutive CD27/CD70 interaction induces expansion of effector-type T cells and results in IFNgamma-mediated B cell depletion. Immunity 2001; 15: 80112.
  • 152
    Zhai Y, Guo R, Hsu TL et al. LIGHT, a novel ligand for lymphotoxin beta receptor and TR2/HVEM induces apoptosis and suppresses in vivo tumor formation via gene transfer. J Clin Invest 1998; 102: 114251.
  • 153
    Morel Y, Truneh A, Sweet RW, Olive D, Costello RT. The TNF superfamily members LIGHT and CD154 (CD40 ligand) costimulate induction of dendritic cell maturation and elicit specific CTL activity. J Immunol 2001; 167: 247986.
  • 154
    Harrop JA, Reddy M, Dede K et al. Antibodies to TR2 (herpesvirus entry mediator), a new member of the TNF receptor superfamily, block T cell proliferation, expression of activation markers, and production of cytokines. J Immunol 1998; 161: 178694.
  • 155
    Ye Q, Fraser CC, Gao W et al. Modulation of LIGHT-HVEM costimulation prolongs cardiac allograft survival. J Exp Med 2002; 195: 795800.
  • 156
    Wang J, Chun T, Lo JC et al. The critical role of LIGHT, a TNF family member, in T cell development. J Immunol 2001; 167: 5099105.
  • 157
    Shaikh RB, Santee S, Granger SW, Butrovich K, Cheung T, Kronenberg M, Cheroutre H, Ware CF. Constitutive expression of LIGHT on T cells leads to lymphocyte activation, inflammation, and tissue destruction. J Immunol 2001; 167: 63307.
  • 158
    Stopfer P, Mannel DN, Hehlgans T. Lymphotoxin-beta receptor activation by activated T cells induces cytokine release from mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells. J Immunol 2004; 172: 745965.
  • 159
    Van Oosten BW, Barkhof F, Truyen L et al. Increased MRI activity and immune activation in two multiple sclerosis patients treated with the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody cA2. Neurology 1996; 47: 15314.
  • 160
    Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR. Onset of multiple sclerosis associated with anti-TNF therapy. Neurology 2001; 57: 18858.
  • 161
    Selmaj KW, Raine CS. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: immunotherapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors. Neurology 1995; 45: S44S49.
  • 162
    Kassiotis G, Kollias G. TNF and receptors in organ-specific autoimmune disease: multi-layered functioning mirrored in animal models. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 15078.
  • 163
    Ishida H, Muchamuel T, Sakaguchi S, Andrade S, Menon S, Howard M. Continuous administration of anti-interleukin 10 antibodies delays onset of autoimmunity in NZB/W F1 mice. J Exp Med 1994; 179: 30510.
  • 164
    Kassiotis G, Kranidioti K, Kollias G. Defective CD4T cell priming and resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in TNF-deficient mice due to innate immune hypo-responsiveness. J Neuroimmunol 2001; 119: 23947.
  • 165
    Quattrocchi E, Walmsley M, Browne K, Williams RO, Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Buurman W, Butler DM, Feldmann M. Paradoxical effects of adenovirus-mediated blockade of TNF activity in murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol 1999; 163: 10009.
  • 166
    Feldmann M. Gene therapy for rheumatoid arthritis? J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 1353.
  • 167
    Sandborn WJ. Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 1999; 2: 1138.
  • 168
    McDevitt H, Munson S, Ettinger R, Wu A. Multiple roles for tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lymphotoxin alpha/beta in immunity and autoimmunity. Arthritis Res 2002; 4 (Suppl. 3):S141S152.
  • 169
    Wu Q, Sun Y, Wang J et al. Signal via lymphotoxin-beta R on bone marrow stromal cells is required for an early checkpoint of NK cell development. J Immunol 2001; 166: 16849.
  • 170
    Ettinger R, Munson SH, Chao CC, Vadeboncoeur M, Toma J, McDevitt HO. A critical role for lymphotoxin-beta receptor in the development of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J Exp Med 2001; 193: 133340.
  • 171
    Suen WE, Bergman CM, Hjelmstrom P, Ruddle NH. A critical role for lymphotoxin in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 1997; 186: 123340.
  • 172
    Cheema GS, Roschke V, Hilbert DM, Stohl W. Elevated serum B lymphocyte stimulator levels in patients with systemic immune-based rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 13139.
  • 173
    Laabi Y, Strasser A. Immunology. Lymphocyte survival – ignorance is BLys. Science 2000; 289: 8834.
  • 174
    Laabi Y, Egle A, Strasser A. TNF cytokine family: more BAFF-ling complexities. Curr Biol 2001; 11: R1013R1016.
  • 175
    Gross JA, Johnston J, Mudri S et al. TACI and BCMA are receptors for a TNF homologue implicated in B-cell autoimmune disease. Nature 2000; 404: 9959.
  • 176
    Gross JA, Dillon SR, Mudri S et al. TACI-Ig neutralizes molecules critical for B cell development and autoimmune disease. impaired B cell maturation in mice lacking BLyS. Immunity 2001; 15: 289302.
  • 177
    Yan M, Wang H, Chan B et al. Activation and accumulation of B cells in TACI-deficient mice. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 63843.
  • 178
    He B, Chadburn A, Jou E, Schattner EJ, Knowles DM, Cerutti A. Lymphoma B cells evade apoptosis through the TNF family members BAFF/BLyS and APRIL. J Immunol 2004; 172: 326879.
  • 179
    Do RK, Chen-Kiang S. Mechanism of BLyS action in B cell immunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002; 13: 1925.
  • 180
    Gerli R, Monti D, Bistoni O et al. Chemokines, sTNF-Rs and sCD30 serum levels in healthy aged people and centenarians. Mech Ageing Dev 2000; 121: 3746.
  • 181
    Gerli R, Pitzalis C, Bistoni O, Falini B, Costantini V, Russano A, Lunardi C. CD30+ T cells in rheumatoid synovitis: mechanisms of recruitment and functional role. J Immunol 2000; 164: 4399407.
  • 182
    Siegmund T, Armitage N, Wicker LS, Peterson LB, Todd JA, Lyons PA. Analysis of the mouse CD30 gene. a candidate for the NOD mouse type 1 diabetes locus Idd9.2. Diabetes 2000; 49: 16126.
  • 183
    Chakrabarty S, Nagata M, Yasuda H et al. Critical roles of CD30/CD30L interactions in murine autoimmune diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 2003; 133: 31825.
  • 184
    Horie R, Watanabe T. CD30. expression and function in health and disease. Semin Immunol 1998; 10: 45770.
  • 185
    Takahashi H, Ebihara S, Kanda A, Kamanaka M, Sato T, Habu S, Kikutani H, Sasaki H. Increased susceptibility to airway responses in CD40-deficient mice. Clin Exp Immunol 2003; 133: 229.
  • 186
    Dai Z, Li Q, Wang Y, Gao G, Diggs LS, Tellides G, Lakkis FG. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress allograft rejection mediated by memory CD8+ T cells via a CD30-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 3107.
  • 187
    Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Takahashi T, Ishida Y, Sakaguchi S. Stimulation of CD25 (+) CD4 (+) regulatory T cells through GITR breaks immunological self-tolerance. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 13542.
  • 188
    Uraushihara K, Kanai T, Ko K, Totsuka T, Makita S, Iiyama R, Nakamura T, Watanabe M. Regulation of murine inflammatory bowel disease by CD25+ and. J Immunol 2003; 171: 70816.
  • 189
    Kohm AP, Williams JS, Miller SD. Cutting edge: ligation of the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor enhances autoreactive CD4+ T cell activation and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 2004; 172: 468690.
  • 190
    Ermann J, Fathman CG. Costimulatory signals controlling regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 152923.
  • 191
    Sedy JR, Gavrieli M, Potter KG et al. B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates T cell activation through interaction with herpesvirus entry mediator. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 908.
  • 192
    Banks TA, Rouse BT, Kerley MK et al. Lymphotoxin-alpha-deficient mice. Effects on secondary lymphoid organ development and humoral immune responsiveness. J Immunol 1995; 155: 168593.
  • 193
    De Togni P, Goellner J, Ruddle NH et al. Abnormal development of peripheral lymphoid organs in mice deficient in lymphotoxin. Science 1994; 264: 7037.
  • 194
    Kang HS, Chin RK, Wang YYuP, Wang J, Newell KA, Fu YX. Signaling via LTbetaR on the lamina propria stromal cells of the gut is required for IgA production. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 57682.
  • 195
    Koni PA, Sacca R, Lawton P, Browning JL, Ruddle NH, Flavell RA. Distinct roles in lymphoid organogenesis for lymphotoxins alpha and beta revealed in lymphotoxin beta-deficient mice. Immunity 1997; 6: 491500.
  • 196
    Alimzhanov MB, Kuprash DV, Kosco-Vilbois MH et al. Abnormal development of secondary lymphoid tissues in lymphotoxin beta-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 93027.
  • 197
    Berger DP, Naniche D, Crowley MT, Koni PA, Flavell RA, Oldstone MB. Lymphotoxin-beta-deficient mice show defective antiviral immunity. Virology 1999; 260: 13647.
  • 198
    Pasparakis M, Alexopoulou L, Episkopou V, Kollias G. Immune and inflammatory responses in TNF alpha-deficient mice. a critical requirement for TNF alpha in the formation of primary B cell follicles, follicular dendritic cell networks and germinal centers, and in the maturation of the humoral immune response. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 1397411.
  • 199
    Pasparakis M, Alexopoulou L, Grell M, Pfizenmaier K, Bluethmann H, Kollias G. Peyer's patch organogenesis is intact yet formation of B lymphocyte follicles is defective in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice deficient for tumor necrosis factor and its 55-kDa receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 631923.
  • 200
    Rothe J, Lesslauer W, Lotscher H et al. Mice lacking the tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 are resistant to TNF-mediated toxicity but highly susceptible to infection by Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 1993; 364: 798802.
  • 201
    Koni PA, Flavell RA. A role for tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1 in gut-associated lymphoid tissue development: genetic evidence of synergism with lymphotoxin beta. J Exp Med 1998; 187: 197783.
  • 202
    Korner H, Cook M, Riminton DS et al. Distinct roles for lymphotoxin-alpha and tumor necrosis factor in organogenesis and spatial organization of lymphoid tissue. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27: 26009.
  • 203
    Eugster HP, Muller M, Karrer U et al. Multiple immune abnormalities in tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin-alpha double-deficient mice. Int Immunol 1996; 8: 2336.
  • 204
    Kuprash DV, Alimzhanov MB, Tumanov AV, Anderson AO, Pfeffer K, Nedospasov SA. TNF and lymphotoxin beta cooperate in the maintenance of secondary lymphoid tissue microarchitecture but not in the development of lymph nodes. J Immunol 1999; 163: 657580.
  • 205
    Tumanov A, Kuprash D, Lagarkova M et al. Distinct role of surface lymphotoxin expressed by B cells in the organization of secondary lymphoid tissues. Immunity 2002; 17: 23950.
  • 206
    Erickson SL, De Sauvage FJ, Kikly K et al. Decreased sensitivity to tumour-necrosis factor but normal T-cell development in TNF receptor-2-deficient mice. Nature 1994; 372: 5603.
  • 207
    Wang B, Fujisawa H, Zhuang L, Kondo S, Shivji GM, Kim CS, Mak TW, Sauder DN. Depressed Langerhans cell migration and reduced contact hypersensitivity response in mice lacking TNF receptor p75. J Immunol 1997; 159: 614855.
  • 208
    Xu J, Foy TM, Laman JD et al. Mice deficient for the CD40 ligand. Immunity 1994; 1: 42331.
  • 209
    Kawabe T, Naka T, Yoshida K et al. The immune responses in CD40-deficient mice: impaired immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. Immunity 1994; 1: 16778.
  • 210
    Renshaw BR, Fanslow WC III, Armitage RJ, Campbell KA, Liggitt D, Wright B, Davison BL, Maliszewski CR. Humoral immune responses in CD40 ligand-deficient mice. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1889900.
  • 211
    Schiemann B, Gommerman JL, Vora K, Cachero TG, Shulga-Morskaya S, Dobles M, Frew E, Scott ML. An essential role for BAFF in the normal development of B cells through a BCMA-independent pathway. Science 2001; 293: 21114.
  • 212
    Thompson JS, Bixler SA, Qian F et al. BAFF-R, a newly identified TNF receptor that specifically interacts with BAFF. Science 2001; 293: 210811.
  • 213
    Varfolomeev E, Kischkel F, Martin F et al. APRIL-deficient mice have normal immune system development. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 9971006.
  • 214
    Thompson JS, Bixler SA, Qian F et al. BAFF-R, a newly identified TNF receptor that specifically interacts with BAFF. Science 2001; 293: 210811.
  • 215
    Flynn JL, Goldstein MM, Chan J et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is required in the protective immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Immunity 1995; 2: 56172.
  • 216
    Everest P, Roberts M, Dougan G. Susceptibility to Salmonella typhimurium infection and effectiveness of vaccination in mice deficient in the tumor necrosis factor alpha p55 receptor. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 335564.
  • 217
    Pfeffer K, Matsuyama T, Kundig TM et al. Mice deficient for the 55 kd tumor necrosis factor receptor are resistant to endotoxic shock, yet succumb to L. monocytogenes infection. Cell 1993; 73: 45767.
  • 218
    Hultgren O, Eugster HP, Sedgwick JD, Korner H, Tarkowski A. TNF/lymphotoxin-alpha double-mutant mice resist septic arthritis but display increased mortality in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol 1998; 161: 593742.
  • 219
    Jensen ER, Glass AA, Clark WR, Wing EJ, Miller JF, Gregory SH. Fas (CD95)-dependent cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 414350.
  • 220
    Ehlers S, Holscher C, Scheu S, Tertilt C, Hehlgans T, Suwinski J, Endres R, Pfeffer K. The lymphotoxin beta receptor is critically involved in controlling infections with the intracellular pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol 2003; 170: 52108.
  • 221
    Bansal-Pakala P, Halteman BS, Cheng MH, Croft M. Costimulation of CD8 T cell responses by OX40. J Immunol 2004; 172: 48215.
  • 222
    Murata K, Ishii N, Takano H, Miura S, Ndhlovu LC, Nose M, Noda T, Sugamura K. Impairment of antigen-presenting cell function in mice lacking expression of OX40 ligand. J Exp Med 2000; 191: 36574.
  • 223
    Hoshino A, Tanaka Y, Akiba H et al. Critical role for OX40 ligand in the development of pathogenic Th2 cells in a murine model of asthma. Eur J Immunol 2003; 33: 8619.
  • 224
    Elkon KB, Marshak-Rothstein A. B cells in systemic autoimmune disease. recent insights from Fas-deficient mice and men. Curr Opin Immunol 1996; 8: 8529.
  • 225
    Salek-Ardakani S, Song J, Halteman BS, Jember AG, Akiba H, Yagita H, Croft M. OX40 (CD134) controls memory T helper 2 cells that drive lung inflammation. J Exp Med 2003; 198: 31524.
  • 226
    Song J, Salek-Ardakani S, Rogers PR, Cheng M, Van Parijs L, Croft M. The costimulation-regulated duration of PKB activation controls T cell longevity. Nat Immunol 2004; 5: 1508.
  • 227
    Sato T, Ishii N, Murata K, Kikuchi K, Nakagawa S, Ndhlovu LC, Sugamura K. Consequences of OX40–OX40 ligand interactions in langerhans cell function: enhanced contact hypersensitivity responses in OX40L-transgenic mice. Eur J Immunol 2002; 32: 332635.
  • 228
    Amakawa R, Hakem A, Kundig TM et al. Impaired negative selection of T cells in Hodgkin's disease antigen CD30-deficient mice. Cell 1996; 84: 55162.
  • 229
    Blazar BR, Levy RB, Mak TW et al. CD30/CD30 ligand (CD153) interaction regulates CD4+ T cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol 2004; 173: 293341.
  • 230
    Kurts C, Carbone FR, Krummel MF, Koch KM, Miller JF, Heath WR. Signalling through CD30 protects against autoimmune diabetes mediated by CD8 T cells. Nature 1999; 398: 3414.
  • 231
    Kurts C, Heath WR, Kosaka H, Miller JF, Carbone FR. The peripheral deletion of autoreactive CD8+ T cells induced by cross-presentation of self-antigens involves signaling through CD95 (Fas, Apo-1). J Exp Med 1998; 188: 41520.
  • 232
    Cho HR, Kwon B, Yagita H et al. Blockade of 4–1BB (CD137)/4-1BB ligand interactions increases allograft survival. Transpl Int 2004; 17: 35161.
  • 233
    Kwon BS, Hurtado JC, Lee ZH et al. Immune responses in 4-1BB (CD137)-deficient mice. J Immunol 2002; 168: 548390.
  • 234
    Shulga-Morskaya S, Dobles M, Walsh ME, Ng LG, Mackay F, Rao SP, Kalled SL, Scott ML. B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family acts through separate receptors to support B cell survival and T cell-independent antibody formation. J Immunol 2004; 173: 233141.
  • 235
    Liu J, Na S, Glasebrook A, Fox N, Solenberg PJ, Zhang Q, Song HY, Yang DD. Enhanced CD4+ T cell proliferation and Th2 cytokine production in DR6-deficient mice. Immunity 2001; 15: 2334.
  • 236
    Wang EC, Thern A, Denzel A, Kitson J, Farrow SN, Owen MJ. DR3 regulates negative selection during thymocyte development. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21: 345161.
  • 237
    Kishimoto H, Surh CD, Sprent J. A role for Fas in negative selection of thymocytes in vivo. J Exp Med 1998; 187: 142738.
  • 238
    Apostolou I, Hao Z, Rajewsky K, Von Boehmer H. Effective destruction of Fas-deficient insulin-producing beta cells in type 1 diabetes. J Exp Med 2003; 198: 11036.
  • 239
    Bednarski JJ, Warner RE, Rao T et al. Attenuation of autoimmune disease in Fas-deficient mice by treatment with a cytotoxic benzodiazepine. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 75766.
  • 240
    Dittel BN, Merchant RM, Janeway CA Jr. Evidence for Fas-dependent and Fas-independent mechanisms in the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 1999; 162: 6392400.
  • 241
    Jeyarajah DR, Kielar M, Gokaslan ST, Lindberg G, Lu CY. Fas deficiency exacerbates cerulein-induced pancreatitis. J Invest Surg 2003; 16: 32533.
  • 242
    Kanegane H, Vilela MM, Wang Y, Futatani T, Matsukura H, Miyawaki T. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome presenting with glomerulonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 4546.
  • 243
    Li XC, Li Y, Dodge I, Wells AD, Zheng XX, Turka LA, Strom TB. Induction of allograft tolerance in the absence of Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Immunol 1999; 163: 25007.