• Toll-like receptors;
  • regulatory CD4+ CD25+ T cells;
  • immune response;
  • immune tolerance;
  • autoimmune disease


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

Regulatory CD4+ CD25+ T (Treg) cells with the ability to suppress host immune responses against self- or non-self antigens play important roles in the processes of autoimmunity, transplant rejection, infectious diseases and cancers. The proper regulation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is thus critical for optimal immune responses. Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated recognition of specific structures of invading pathogens initiates innate as well as adaptive immune responses via antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Interestingly, new evidence suggests that TLR signalling may directly or indirectly regulate the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in immune responses. TLR signalling may shift the balance between CD4+ T-helper cells and Treg cells, and subsequently influence the outcome of the immune response. This immunomodulation pathway may therefore have potential applications in the treatment of graft rejection, autoimmune diseases, infection diseases and cancers.


antigen-presenting cell


dendritic cell


death domain


Forkhead box protein 3




IL-1R-associated kinase


interferon regulatory factor 3






lipoteichoic acid


myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88




nuclear factor κB


pathogen-associated molecular pattern


transforming growth factor


tumour necrosis factor

Treg cell

regulatory T cell

Tr1 cell

type 1 regulatory T cell


tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6


TRIF-related adaptor molecule


TIR-associated protein


TIR domain containing adaptor inducing IFN-β

Th3 cell

type 3 regulatory T cell


Toll-like receptor.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

The family of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) is a major class of receptors that recognize molecular patterns associated with pathogens including bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa. It was commonly accepted that TLR-mediated recognition of specific structures of invading pathogens initiates innate as well as adaptive immune responses via dendritic cells (DCs) or other antigen-presenting cells (APCs).1–3 However, there is emerging evidence that TLR signalling participates in inflammation and immune responses that are driven by self-, allo- or xeno-antigens.4–7 TLR signalling has been demonstrated to be involved in the immune recognition of allo- or xenografts and the occurrence of autoimmunity both in experimental and in clinical studies.5,8–10 This observation was strongly supported by the expression of TLRs on almost all immune cells and the endogenous expression of their ligands on mammalian cells.

However, there has recently been an explosion of renewed interest in regulatory T (Treg) cells, especially on three postulated CD4+ Treg cell populations: the naturally occurring and inducing CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, and two inducible populations, type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells and type 3 regulatory T (Th3) cells.11–13 It is clear now that the CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell population not only critically contributes to the maintenance of self-tolerance but also has the potential to prevent the immune rejection of allografts.14,15 Recent studies have shown that TLR signalling may directly or indirectly regulate the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in graft rejection, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases and cancers,16–19 which is the focus of the present review.

TLRs and their ligands

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

TLRs have recently emerged as a critical component of the innate immune system for detecting microbial infections, APC activation and the induction of adaptive immune responses.20,21 At least 13 TLRs have been identified in humans and mice to date.20,22–24 The initial role of TLRs in innate immunity against micro-organisms has been studied extensively.25–31 They recognize limited but highly conserved molecular structures, so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (Table 1).22,32–34 Thus, TLRs recognize conserved molecular features of bacteria, fungi and viruses.

Table 1.   Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and their exogenous and endogenous ligands
TLRExogenous ligandsEndogenous ligandsReferences
  1. gp96, glycoprotein 96 (the endoplamic reticulum form of hsp90); HMGB1, high- mobility group box 1; hsp, heat shock protein; IgG, immunoglobulin G; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

TLR1Bacterial triacyl lipopeptides and proteins in parasitesUnknown22
TLR2Bacterial diacyl lipopeptides, lipoteichoic acid from Gram-positive bacteria, and zymosan from the cell wall  of yeasthsp70, gp96, necrotic cells  and HMGB122,29,30,32,34
TLR3Double-stranded RNA from virusesmRNA20
TLR4Endotoxin (LPS) from Gram- negative bacteriahsp60, hsp70, hyaluronan, lung  surfactant protein A, fibronectin,  fibrinogen, heparan, HMGB1 and  β-defensin 222,30,31,34
TLR5Flagellin from mobile bacteriaUnknown41
TLR6Partnered with TLR2Unknown20
TLR7Single-stranded RNA from virusesUnknown25
TLR8Same as TLR7Unknown52
TLR9CpG DNA from bacteria or virusesChromatin–IgG complexes26
TLR11Profilin, a protein from the protozoan pathogen Toxoplasmosis gondii that can cause miscarriage; may  also respond to components of bacteria that cause  bladder and kidney infectionsUnknown22,27

Interestingly and importantly, some endogenous ligands of TLRs were identified recently. Heat shock proteins (hsps) such as hsp60, hsp70, hsp90 and glycoprotein 96 (gp96; the endoplasmic reticulum form of hsp90) of bacterial and mammalian origins have been shown to induce the inflammatory response.35 Using macrophages from C3H/HeJ mice with a TLR4 gene point mutation, researchers demonstrated that the effects of recombinant human hsp60 (rhhsp60) were dependent on TLR4, suggesting that hsp60 might be an endogenous TLR4 ligand.22,30,36 Since then, using TLR4 mutant mice, TLR2 knockout mice, and/or fibroblasts transfected with TLR2, TLR3 or TLR4 cDNA, researchers have found that fibrinogen, surfactant protein A, fibronectin extra domain A, heparan sulphate, soluble hyaluronan and murine β-defensin 2 are endogenous ligands for TLR4; hsp60, hsp70, gp96 and high mobility group 1 (HMGB1) protein are endogenous ligands for both TLR2 and TLR4;32,34,35,37 and mRNA is an endogenous ligand for TLR338 (Table 1).

The identification of endogenous ligands for TLRs raised the possibility that TLRs may be involved in self-tolerance and surveillance, which are critical for the occurrence of autoimmune diseases and cancers.3,39 TLRs recognize not only the endogenous and exogenous molecules but also the degradation products of endogenous macromolecules such as heparan sulphate and polysaccharide fragments of hyaluronan, which indicate tissue injury, infection and/or tissue remodelling.22,32–34,36,37 However, fibrinogen is normally present in the circulation at high concentrations.35,37 Thus, monocytes, DCs and sinusoidal macrophages such as hepatic Kupffer cells and splenic macrophages are constantly exposed to fibrinogen. However, surfactant protein A is normally present in lung alveoli where alveolar macrophages reside.39,40 Life-long continuous exposure of immune cells to these TLR ligands may be potentially deleterious to the host. However, the question of why the recognition of endogenous molecules, such as fibrinogen and surfactant protein A, by TLR4 does not mediate the activation of APCs in a physical situation needs to be addressed.

TLR expression on T cells

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

TLR expression has been detected in many types of immune cells, including different subsets of DCs, T cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, monocytes and epithelial cells (Table 2).22,41,42 Importantly, the expression of TLRs is related to the functional states of different subtypes of T cells. Studies have shown that naïve CD4+ T cells do not express significant levels of TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA and intracellular proteins. Only a few CD3+ T cells express TLR1, TLR2 or TLR4 on the cell surface when they have not been activated.43 However, activated/memory T cells express appreciable levels of cell surface TLR2 and TLR4.5,21,44 T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation by cross-linked anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces cell surface expression of TLR2 and TLR4 on naïve human and murine CD4+ T cells.5,45 By contrast, TCR stimulation significantly down-modulates surface TLR5 expression on human CD4+ T cells.41 Moreover, TLR3, TLR6, TLR7 and TLR9 are also expressed on CD4+ T cells.46 Thus, some TLRs may function as costimulator receptors for antigen-specific T-cell development and immune responses, and participate in the maintenance of T-cell memory.47,48 These data indicate that pathogens, via their PAMPs, may contribute directly to the perpetuation and activation of memory T cells.

Table 2.   The expression pattern of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) on different immune cells
TLRExpression on immune cellsReferences
  1. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PML, peripheral mononuclear leucocyte.

TLR1Most cell types including DCs and B cells22
TLR2PMLs, DCs, monocytes and T cells21,29,30
TLR3DCs, NK cells and T cells20,38
TLR4Macrophages, DCs and T cells20,30,31
TLR5Monocytes, DCs, NK cells and T cells20,41
TLR6High expression in B cells and DCs; low in monocytes and NK cells20,63
TLR7B cells, DCs, monocytes and T cells25,38
TLR8Monocytes, DCs; low in NK and T cells26,52
TLR9DCs, B cells, PMLs, macrophages, NK cells and microglial cells22,26
TLR10B cells; low in DCs17,38

Some TLRs are expressed on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells (see Table 4 below). It has been reported that CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in naïve mice selectively express TLR4, TLR5, TLR7 and TLR8, whereas TLR1, TLR2, TLR3 and TLR6 appear to be more widely expressed on CD4+ T cells, and not confined to CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.49,50 The distinct expression patterns of TLRs on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells support the potential involvement of these TLRs in the regulation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.

Table 4.   Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression and function on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells
TLREffector T cellsCD4+CD25+ Treg cellsEffects on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cellsReferences
Cell proliferationSuppression
  1. +, normal expression; ++ higher expression compared with effector T cells.

TLR1++  49
TLR2++?Up-regulation/  down-regulation (?)21,58
TLR6++  49
TLR7+++  49
TLR8+++ Down-regulation48
TLR9++YesBlocking (partially  via effector T cells)65

TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

Naturally occurring and antigen-induced CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells have been extensively studied in mice and humans. Depletion of the naturally occurring subset of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells results in various types of autoimmune disease.11,12,27,41 CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells inhibit a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations such asgastritis, oophoritis, orchitis, thyroiditis, inflammatory bowel disease and spontaneous autoimmune diabetes.11,12,27,41,51 Although CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells play a critical role in the regulation of immunity, we know little about the regulation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells. Interestingly, new evidence suggests that TLR signalling may directly or indirectly regulate the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in immune responses.16,17

To date, differential TLR expression on CD4+ T cells and CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells has been found, suggesting that TLRs may be directly involved in adaptive immune responses, but how TLRs directly regulate adaptive immune responses is still not fully understood.52,53 Recently, a close relationship between TLRs and autoimmune diseases has been reported in mouse models. In a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), when TLR9 was absent, SLE was exacerbated with increased activation of lymphocytes and plasmacytoid DCs as well as enhanced levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and interferon-α (IFN-α) in sera. In contrast, TLR7-deficient mice had ameliorated SLE with decreased lymphocyte activation and serum IgG levels.54 These data reveal opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles for TLR7 and TLR9 in SLE. Importantly, it is interesting that, in in vitro CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell suppression assays, engagement of TLR4 or TLR9 on freshly isolated mouse splenic DCs could significantly abrogate the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, by rendering effector T cells resistant to CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell-mediated suppression through DC expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6), but not the effects of costimulation.39 Thus, the regulation of TLRs on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells may directly or indirectly play a role in the occurrence of autoimmune diseases.

There is accumulating evidence of significant alterations in TLR expression on T cells in patients who have infectious diseases, although it is unclear whether altered TLR expression on T cells contributes directly to pathophysiology or immune defence in these patients.55,56 Furthermore, cross-talk between TLRs and CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in tumours has also been noted.5,21 Elucidation of TLR signalling in adaptive immune responses in terms of both direct and indirect regulation of the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells may therefore have therapeutic benefits in inflammation, cancers and autoimmune diseases (Table 3).

Table 3.   Potential roles of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) as therapeutic targets in inflammatory diseases, cancers and autoimmune diseases
TLRRelated diseasesReferences
TLR1Bacterial/fungal diseases,  Gram-positive sepsis20,22
TLR2Bacterial/fungal diseases,  Gram-positive sepsis21,29,30
TLR3Viral diseases10,20
TLR4Bacterial diseases, Gram-negative  sepsis, chronic inflammation,  autoimmune diseases, cancers,  atherosclerosis20,30
TLR5Bacterial diseases41
TLR6Mycobacterial diseases3,20
TLR7Viral diseases20,38
TLR8Viral diseases20,52
TLR9Bacterial and viral diseases,  autoimmune diseases, cancers26

The direct regulatory effects of TLRs on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells

TLR2–/– mice, unlike TLR4–/– mice, contain significantly fewer CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells than control mice.21 Administration of TLR2 ligands to wild-type mice results in significantly increased CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell numbers.5,21 In the presence of a TLR2 agonist, such as the synthetic bacterial lipoprotein Pam3Cys-SK4, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells expand markedly but their immunosuppressive function is temporarily abrogated.5 However, studies have shown that hsp60 could act as a costimulator of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.21,46,57 Treatment of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells with hsp60 or its peptide p277 before anti-CD3 mAb-induced activation significantly enhanced the ability of the CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells to down-regulate the function of CD4+CD25 or CD8+ target T cells, detected through the inhibition of target T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α secretion.58 The enhanced costimulatory effects of hsp60 on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells involved innate signalling via TLR2, which led to activation of protein kinase C, phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase, and p38.58 hsp60-treated CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells suppressed target T cells both by cell contact mechanisms and by secretion of cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-10.58 Thus, hsp60, a self-molecule, can down-regulate adaptive immune responses by up-regulating CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells innately through TLR2 signalling and not through APCs. Thus, the effect of TLR2 on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is somewhat controversial and further investigation is required.

Researchers observed that exposure of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells to the TLR4 ligand lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced up-regulation of several activation markers and enhanced their survival or proliferation.49 The proliferative response does not require APCs and is augmented by TCR triggering and IL-2 stimulation.49 Most importantly, LPS treatment increases the immunosuppressive ability of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells by 10-fold.49 Moreover, LPS-activated CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells can efficiently control the occurrence of naïve CD4+ effector T cell-mediated diseases.49 These findings provide the first evidence that CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells respond directly to pro-inflammatory bacterial products, a mechanism that is likely to contribute to the control of inflammatory responses. However, others failed to observe effects of LPS on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.41,45,59 Thus, LPS-induced signalling on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is still controversial.

TLR5 ligand flagellin has important effects in regulating mucosal immune responses.41,60,61 Both human CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and CD4+CD25 T cells express TLR5 at levels comparable to those on monocytes and DCs. Costimulation of CD4+ effector T cells with anti-CD3 mAb and flagellin resulted in enhanced proliferation and production of IL-2 at levels equivalent to those achieved by costimulation with CD28. In contrast, costimulation with flagellin did not break the hyporesponsiveness of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, but rather potently increased their immunosuppressive capacity and enhanced expression of Forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3).41,60 However, in a tumour mouse model, administration of flagellin, which is specifically recognized by TLR5, at 8–10 days after tumour implantation produced significant inhibition of the growth of the antigenic tumour, which was associated with an increased IFN-γ:IL-4 ratio and a decreased frequency of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.62 In contrast, flagellin administered at the time of tumour implantation led to accelerated tumour growth, which was associated with a decreased IFN-γ:IL-4 ratio and an increased CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell frequency.62 Whether the contrasting effects of activation of TLR5 by flagellin on tumour growth are attributable to the different impacts on effector T cells and CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and/or the different effects on naïve and activated/memory CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells has not yet been determined.

In addition, TLR8 could directly reverse the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.21,52 It has been reported that CpG-A and poly (G10) oligonucleotides could directly reverse the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in the absence of DCs, but the exact functional ingredients were not identified in that study.49 Further experiments indicated that short poly (G) oligonucleotides [poly (G2), poly (G3) and poly (G4) with phosphorothioate linkages] had a more potent ability to reverse CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell function than longer oligonucleotides [poly (G5), poly (G7) and poly (G10)].52 Interestingly, when TLR8 and myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88) were knocked down using an RNA interference method, the response ability of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells to poly (G) oligonucleotides was abolished. Consistent with these results, TLR8 was consistently expressed by naturally occurring as well as inducing CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.52,63,64 A recent study more clearly demonstrated that the immunosuppression of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is abrogated by TLR8 triggering directly on the CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, not on the CD4+ effector T cells.52 These results consistently support the hypothesis that the TLR8–MyD88 signalling pathway directly controls the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells without the involvement of APCs.

The TLR9 ligand CpG oligodeoxynucleotide synergizes with anti-CD3 mAb to induce proliferation of both rat CD4+ CD25 and CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.65 Surprisingly, TLR9 ligand partially abrogates the suppressive activity mediated by CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, which is partially attributable to the direct effect of TLR9 ligand on effector T cells which are rendered more resistant to the regulation exerted by CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.65 Thus, TLR9 ligand may rapidly increase the host's adaptive immunity by expanding effector T cells and also by attenuating the suppressive activity mediated by CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.

Taking these results together, it is obvious that CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells express certain TLRs. In general, TLR2(?), TLR8 or TLR9 ligation abrogates or reverses the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, whereas TLR2(?), TLR4 or TLR5 ligation enhances CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell suppressive capacity (Table 4).

The mechanisms by which TLRs modulate the immunosuppressive ability of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells are not clear. One explanation is that the up-regulation or down-regulation of Foxp3 expression following stimulation by different TLRs may be related to the functional alteration of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells. However, how TLR signalling affects Foxp3 expression needs to be addressed. Another possibility to explain the abrogated immunosuppressive function but enhanced proliferative capacity of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells after TLR stimulation is suggested by reports indicating that CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells rapidly lose their ability to inhibit proliferation after receiving strong activation signals. Experimental data support the idea that TLR2 on murine CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells might function as a strong costimulatory trigger.5,37 We may speculate that some TLR-mediated signals force CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells into the proliferative pathway, which might be paralleled by the reversal of their immunosuppressive capabilities. However, TLR4 may induce CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell proliferation while enhancing the immunosuppressive ability of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, which does not support this speculation.

The indirect regulatory effects of TLRs on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells

A central function of TLRs is to directly activate acute antimicrobial defence systems. TLRs are known to induce the production of antimicrobial proteins and peptides by various cell types, including cells of myeloid origin in the gut epithelium.4,41,66 Activation of resident macrophages through TLRs also leads to production of various cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, etc.) and chemokines (monocyte chemotactic protein 1, etc.), which collectively orchestrate the acute inflammatory response to infections.53,67

DCs are pivotally positioned at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Pathogen recognition is mediated by TLRs which are expressed at high levels on the surface of DCs. Analysis of MyD88-deficient mice demonstrated the critical role of TLRs in DC maturation and induction of adaptive immune responses.3,68,69 MyD88-deficient mouse DCs could not prime antigen-specific naïve T cells in vitro.70 While antigen mixed with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), which contains several ligands for TLRs, leads to a robust immune response in wild-type mice, it fails to trigger T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production in MyD88-deficient mice.71,72 These data suggest that engagement of TLRs on DCs in vivo is required for DC maturation, secretion of cytokines and chemokines and antigen-presenting ability, which subsequently control the choice of the effector T cells of adaptive immune responses. TLR signalling in macrophages and DCs leads to secretion of IL-12 which skews the resultant CD4+ effector T-cell response towards the T helper type 1 (Th1) phenotype.23 Moreover, TLR triggering in APCs contributes to the adaptive immune response by indirectly controlling the immunosuppression of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.53

Some researchers found that the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is critically dependent on immature DCs and is readily reversed by TLR-induced activation of DCs.59 The potential responsiveness of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells to IL-2 was increased by the co-operative effects of IL-6 and IL-1, both of which are produced by TLR-activated mature DCs.5,58,73 The pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by TLR-activated mature DCs are required for reversal of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell anergy, but whether they are required to overcome the immunosuppression of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells is a matter of controversy.39,59 However, cytokines secreted by APCs in response to TLR ligands are also important for CD4+ effector T cells to overcome the immunosuppressive effects of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.18,23,74

Some studies showed that decreased immunosuppression of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells on effector T cells was mediated by soluble factors produced by DCs in response to the TLR4 ligand LPS or the TLR9 ligand CpG oligonucleotide.5,19,23 The activity of LPS-treated DC supernatants was specifically abrogated by neutralizing anti-IL-6 mAbs, thus indicating the significance of IL-6 in the control of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells on CD4+ CD25 effector T cells.19 These conclusions were further supported by the observation that the supernatant of LPS-stimulated DCs from IL-6–/– knock-out mice was unable to reverse suppression of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.75 However, recombinant IL-6 did not substitute for DC supernatant. This suggests that, in addition to IL-6, some factors, as yet undefined, are essential in this process. However, preincubation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells with the supernatant of LPS-activated DCs did not block the immunosuppressive capacity of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells,76 suggesting that the supernatant of LPS-activated DCs may render CD4+ CD25 effector T cells refractory to suppression rather than blocking the immunosuppressive capacity of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells.23,59,76,77 This regulating network may allow CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells to maintain their function and prevent self-reactive T-cell activation during an ongoing immune response to infections and other damage stimuli.

Although some TLR signalling on DCs by CpG or LPS rendered CD4+ effector T cells refractory to CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell-mediated suppression, TLR-induced mature DCs are also capable of stimulating the proliferation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells,78,79 which may be beneficial for the efficient down-regulation of the immune response as soon as the pathogens have been cleared.

Perspectives and closing remarks

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

Recent studies have demonstrated that the immunosuppressive function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells can be regulated through TLR signalling. Various pathways, including the indirect route via APCs and their cytokine products as well as the direct effects of TLRs on CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, may collectively contribute to the generation, expansion and function of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells. Further studies are needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms for the regulation of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells via TLRs.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References

The authors wish to thank Mr Aqeel Javeed for his review of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation for Key Programs (C30630060 to YZ), the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists (C30600567 to GL), the National Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (C03020504 to YZ), the National Basic Research Program (973 Program, 2003CB515501, to YZ), 100 Quality Vocational Colleges of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2003-85 to YZ), and the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of the State Education Ministry (2005-546 to YZ).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. TLRs and their ligands
  5. TLR expression on T cells
  6. TLRs, CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells and the immune response
  7. Perspectives and closing remarks
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. References
  • 1
    Ausubel FM. Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved? Nat Immunol 2005; 6:9739.
  • 2
    Powrie F, Maloy KJ. Immunology. Regulating the regulators. Science 2003; 299:10301.
  • 3
    Pasare C, Medzhitov R. Toll-dependent control mechanisms of CD4 T cell activation. Immunity 2004; 21:73341.
  • 4
    Liu G, Wu Y, Gong S, Zhao Y. Toll-like receptors and graft rejection. Transpl Immunol 2006; 16:2531.
  • 5
    Liu H, Komai-Koma M, Xu D, Liew FY. Toll-like receptor 2 signaling modulates the functions of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:704853.
  • 6
    Jefferies CA, Fitzgerald KA. Interferon gene regulation: not all roads lead to Tolls. Trends Mol Med 2005; 11:40311.
  • 7
    Uematsu S, Sato S, Yamamoto M et al. Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 plays an essential role for Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7- and TLR9-mediated interferon-α induction. J Exp Med 2005; 201:91523.
  • 8
    Andrade CF, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S, Liu M. Innate immunity and organ transplantation: the potential role of toll-like receptors. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:96975.
  • 9
    Blanco P, Viallard JF, Pellegrin JL, Moreau JF. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005; 17:7314.
  • 10
    Sibilia J. Novel concepts and treatments for autoimmune disease: ten focal points. Joint Bone Spine 2004; 71:5117.
  • 11
    Bach JF. Regulatory T cells under scrutiny. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3:18998.
  • 12
    Zou W. Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:295307.
  • 13
    Yi H, Zhen Y, Jiang L, Zheng J, Zhao Y. The phenotypic characterization of naturally occurring regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells. Cell Mol Immunol 2006; 3:18995.
  • 14
    Caproni M, Torchia D, Antiga E, Volpi W, Bianco ED, Fabbri P. The effects of tacrolimus ointment on regulatory T lymphocytes in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Immunol 2006; 26:3705.
  • 15
    Yang Y, Huang CT, Huang X, Pardoll DM. Persistent Toll-like receptor signals are required for reversal of regulatory T cell-mediated CD8 tolerance. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:50815.
  • 16
    Pasare C, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors: balancing host resistance with immune tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol 2003; 15:67782.
  • 17
    Houot R, Perrot I, Garcia E, Durand I, Lebecque S. Human CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells modulate myeloid but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells activation. J Immunol 2006; 176:52938.
  • 18
    Chaperot L, Blum A, Manches O, Lui G, Angel J, Molens JP, Plumas J. Virus or TLR agonists induce TRAIL-mediated cytotoxic activity of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol 2006; 176:24855.
  • 19
    Bettelli E, Carrier Y, Gao W, Korn T, Strom TB, Oukka M, Weiner HL, Kuchroo VK. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature 2006; 441:2358.
  • 20
    Bellocchio S, Moretti S, Perruccio K et al. TLRs govern neutrophil activity in aspergillosis. J Immunol 2004; 173:740615.
  • 21
    Sutmuller RP, Den Brok MH, Kramer M et al. Toll-like receptor 2 controls expansion and function of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 2006; 116:48594.
  • 22
    Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13:81625.
  • 23
    Warger T, Osterloh P, Rechtsteiner G et al. Synergistic activation of dendritic cells by combined Toll-like receptor ligation induces superior CTL responses in vivo. Blood 2006; 108:54450.
  • 24
    Gautier G, Humbert M, Deauvieau F et al. A type I interferon autocrine-paracrine loop is involved in Toll-like receptor-induced interleukin-12p70 secretion by dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2005; 201:143546.
  • 25
    Lee J, Wu CC, Lee KJ et al. Activation of anti-hepatitis C virus responses via Toll-like receptor 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:182833.
  • 26
    Sun CM, Deriaud E, Leclerc C, Lo-Man R. Upon TLR9 signaling, CD5+ B cells control the IL-12-dependent Th1-priming capacity of neonatal DCs. Immunity 2005; 22:46777.
  • 27
    Wang RF, Peng G, Wang HY. Regulatory T cells and Toll-like receptors in tumor immunity. Semin Immunol 2006; 18:13642.
  • 28
    Hoshino K, Sugiyama T, Matsumoto M et al. IkappaB kinase-alpha is critical for interferon-alpha production induced by Toll-like receptors 7 and 9. Nature 2006; 440:94953.
  • 29
    Patel M, Xu D, Kewin P, Choo-Kang B, McSharry C, Thomson NC, Liew FY. TLR2 agonist ameliorates established allergic airway inflammation by promoting Th1 response and not via regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2005; 174:755863.
  • 30
    Murphy TJ, Choileain NN, Zang Y, Mannick JA, Lederer JA. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells control innate immune reactivity after injury. J Immunol 2005; 174:295763.
  • 31
    Fitzgerald KA, McWhirter SM, Faia KL et al. IKKε and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat Immunol 2003; 4:4916.
  • 32
    Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA. Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5:44658.
  • 33
    Honda K, Yanai H, Negishi H et al. IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature 2005; 434:7727.
  • 34
    Oganesyan G, Saha SK, Guo B, He JQ, Shahangian A, Zarnegar B, Perry A, Cheng G. Critical role of TRAF3 in the Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent antiviral response. Nature 2006; 439:20811.
  • 35
    Johnson BJ, Le TT, Dobbin CA et al. Heat shock protein 10 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory mediator production. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:403747.
  • 36
    Fitzgerald KA, Rowe DC, Barnes BJ et al. LPS-TLR4 signaling to IRF-3/7 and NF-kappaB involves the toll adapters TRAM and TRIF. J Exp Med 2003; 198:104355.
  • 37
    Jung DY, Lee H, Jung BY, Ock J, Lee MS, Lee WH, Suk K. TLR4, but not TLR2, signals autoregulatory apoptosis of cultured microglia: a critical role of IFN-beta as a decision maker. J Immunol 2005; 174:646776.
  • 38
    Nishiya T, Kajita E, Miwa S, Defranco AL. TLR3 and TLR7 are targeted to the same intracellular compartments by distinct regulatory elements. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:3710717.
  • 39
    Pasare C, Medzhitov R. Toll pathway-dependent blockade of CD4+CD25+ T cell-mediated suppression by dendritic cells. Science 2003; 299:10336.
  • 40
    Yasutomi M, Ohshima Y, Omata N, Yamada A, Iwasaki H, Urasaki Y, Mayumi M. Erythromycin differentially inhibits lipopolysaccharide- or poly (I:C)-induced but not peptidoglycan-induced activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 2005; 175:806976.
  • 41
    Crellin NK, Garcia RV, Hadisfar O, Allan SE, Steiner TS, Levings MK. Human CD4+ T cells express TLR5 and its ligand flagellin enhances the suppressive capacity and expression of FOXP3 in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2005; 175:80519.
  • 42
    Mazzoni A, Segal DM. Controlling the Toll road to dendritic cell polarization. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 75:72130.
  • 43
    Babu S, Blauvelt CP, Kumaraswami V, Nutman TB. Cutting edge: Diminished T cell TLR expression and function modulates the immune response in human filarial infection. J Immunol 2006; 176:38859.
  • 44
    Kabelitz D. Expression and function of Toll-like receptors in T lymphocytes. Curr Opin Immunol 2007; 19:3945.
  • 45
    Komai-Koma M, Jones L, Ogg GS, Xu D, Liew FY. TLR2 is expressed on activated T cells as a costimulatory receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:302934.
  • 46
    Sutmuller RP, Morgan ME, Netea MG, Grauer O, Adema GJ. Toll-like receptors on regulatory T cells: expanding immune regulation. Trends Immunol 2006; 27:38793.
  • 47
    Caron G, Duluc D, Fremaux I, Jeannin P, David C, Gascan H, Delneste Y. Direct stimulation of human T cells via TLR5 and TLR7/8: flagellin and R-848 up-regulate proliferation and IFN-γ production by memory CD4+ T cells. J Immunol 2005; 175:15517.
  • 48
    Gelman AE, LaRosa DF, Zhang J, Walsh PT, Choi Y, Sunyer JO, Turka LA. The adaptor molecule MyD88 activates PI-3 kinase signaling in CD4+ T cells and enables CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated costimulation. Immunity 2006; 25:78393.
  • 49
    Caramalho I, Lopes-Carvalho T, Ostler D, Zelenay S, Haury M, Demengeot J. Regulatory T cells selectively express toll-like receptors and are activated by lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med 2003; 197:40311.
  • 50
    Zelenay S, Lopes-Carvalho T, Caramalho I, Moraes-Fontes MF, Rebelo M, Demengeot J. Foxp3+ CD25– CD4 T cells constitute a reservoir of committed regulatory cells that regain CD25 expression upon homeostatic expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:40916.
  • 51
    Zhang L, Yi H, Xia XP, Zhao Y. Transforming growth factor-beta: an important role in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Autoimmunity 2006; 39:26976.
  • 52
    Peng G, Guo Z, Kiniwa Y et al. Toll-like receptor 8-mediated reversal of CD4+ regulatory T cell function. Science 2005; 309:13804.
  • 53
    Kato H, Sato S, Yoneyama M et al. Cell type-specific involvement of RIG-I in antiviral response. Immunity 2005; 23:1928.
  • 54
    Christensen SR, Shupe J, Nickerson K, Kashgarian M, Flavell RA, Shlomchik MJ. Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity 2006; 25:41728.
  • 55
    Mansson A, Adner M, Cardell LO. Toll-like receptors in cellular subsets of human tonsil T cells: altered expression during recurrent tonsillitis. Respir Res 2006; 7:36.
  • 56
    Dolganiuc A, Garcia C, Kodys K, Szabo G. Distinct Toll-like receptor expression in monocytes and T cells in chronic HCV infection. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:1198204.
  • 57
    Kaiser WJ, Offermann MK. Apoptosis induced by the toll-like receptor adaptor TRIF is dependent on its receptor interacting protein homotypic interaction motif. J Immunol 2005; 174:494252.
  • 58
    Zanin-Zhorov A, Cahalon L, Tal G, Margalit R, Lider O, Cohen IR. Heat shock protein 60 enhances CD4CD25 regulatory T cell function via innate TLR2 signaling. J Clin Invest 2006; 116:202232.
  • 59
    Kubo T, Hatton RD, Oliver J, Liu X, Elson CO, Weaver CT. Regulatory T cell suppression and anergy are differentially regulated by proinflammatory cytokines produced by TLR-activated dendritic cells. J Immunol 2004; 173:724958.
  • 60
    Martin M, Rehani K, Jope RS, Michalek SM. Toll-like receptor-mediated cytokine production is differentially regulated by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:77784.
  • 61
    Rehli M. Of mice and men: species variations of Toll-like receptor expression. Trends Immunol 2002; 23:3758.
  • 62
    Sfondrini L, Rossini A, Besusso D, Merlo A, Tagliabue E, Menard S, Balsari A. Antitumor activity of the TLR-5 ligand flagellin in mouse models of cancer. J Immunol 2006; 176:662430.
  • 63
    Wang RF. Regulatory T cells and toll-like receptors in cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2006; 66:498790.
  • 64
    Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H et al. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 2004; 303:15269.
  • 65
    Chiffoleau E, Heslan JM, Heslan M, Louvet C, Condamine T, Cuturi MC. TLR9 ligand enhances proliferation of rat CD4+ T cell and modulates suppressive activity mediated by CD4+ CD25+ T cell. Int Immunol 2007; 19:193201.
  • 66
    Li X, Shen S, Urso D, Kalique S, Park SH, Sharafieh R, O'Rourke J, Cone RE. Phenotypic and immunoregulatory characteristics of monocytic iris cells. Immunology 2006; 117:56675.
  • 67
    Liu G, Xia XP, Gong SL, Zhao Y. The macrophage heterogeneity: difference between mouse peritoneal exudate and splenic F4/80+ macrophages. J Cell Physiol 2006; 209:34152.
  • 68
    Aksoy E, Vanden Berghe W, Detienne S, Amraoui Z, Fitzgerald KA, Haegeman G, Goldman M, Willems F. Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase enhances TRIF-dependent NF-kappa B activation and IFN-beta synthesis downstream of Toll-like receptor 3 and 4. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35:22009.
  • 69
    Aksoy E, Zouain CS, Vanhoutte F et al. Double-stranded RNAs from the helminth parasite Schistosoma activate TLR3 in dendritic cells. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:27783.
  • 70
    Naik SH, Proietto AI, Wilson NS et al. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8+ and CD8– dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. J Immunol 2005; 174:65927.
  • 71
    Saemann MD, Weichhart T, Zeyda M et al. Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein links innate immune cell activation with adaptive immunity via a Toll-like receptor-4-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:46875.
  • 72
    O'Neill LA. Toll-like receptor signal transduction and the tailoring of innate immunity: a role for Mal? Trends Immunol 2002; 23:296300.
  • 73
    Duez C, Gosset P, Tonnel AB. Dendritic cells and toll-like receptors in allergy and asthma. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16:126.
  • 74
    Barchet W, Price JD, Cella M et al. Complement-induced regulatory T cells suppress T-cell responses but allow for dendritic-cell maturation. Blood 2006; 107:1497504.
  • 75
    Zhao J, Kong HJ, Li H et al. IRF-8/interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein is involved in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and contributes to the cross-talk between TLR and IFN-γ signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:1007380.
  • 76
    Honma K, Udono H, Kohno T et al. Interferon regulatory factor 4 negatively regulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages in response to LPS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:160016.
  • 77
    Romani L, Bistoni F, Perruccio K et al. Thymosin alpha 1 activates dendritic cell tryptophan catabolism and establishes a regulatory environment for balance of inflammation and tolerance. Blood 2006; 108:226574.
  • 78
    Higgins SC, Lavelle EC, McCann C et al. Toll-like receptor 4-mediated innate IL-10 activates antigen-specific regulatory T cells and confers resistance to Bordetella pertussis by inhibiting inflammatory pathology. J Immunol 2003; 171:311927.
  • 79
    Rutella S, Danese S, Leone G. Tolerogenic dendritic cells: cytokine modulation comes of age. Blood 2006; 108:143540.